Same for me, he was blocking people for asking about Q on the former Twitter. I'm glad he's come along but he may have used some research that anons did years ago. There are new eyes on now so I will welcome him to the great awakening.😏
I've heard the accusatuons against Alex and Elon of being "controlled opposition" but even so, what they're doing is adding more eyes in what's really happening, and that in my eyes outweigh any potential psyops because the greatest strength of the baddies is staying hidden.
I think he, and others, mocked Q openly, but not behind closed doors for two reasons… 1) needing to maintain relevance without being looked at as alex jones, 2) as he mentions jn his thread, any mention of Q meant instant ban on twitter 1.0…
It wasnt the right time then
No matter what your previous thoughts on Cates are, he is laying it all out for the normies. Cates entire history of not only questioning Q but openly disparaging Q to being a fully awake anon posting Q, closely parallels the process of awakening among the normies. I have a suspicion it was all planned out this way and Cates has been a tool of the Patriots since the beginning that has now been fully activated.
Yes. He's an idiot. And there's absolutely nothing new in this thread he posted. It's a recap of everything we already knew. If you're "oooing and ahhhing" over it, you should go read the drops
Not sure if it is just me but I find X somewhat difficult to use. It shows you part of something, you click on "show more", then afterwards you go back and you're in some other part of the thread which you already saw, etc.
Twitter was originally designed for 160 character text messages to match the existing GSM mobile Short Message Service. I don't think it has evolved well to cope with long threads.
Didn’t Cates used to mock Q and the Anons? What made him a convert? And, now a Q evangelist?
Yes. He mocked Q and all who defended Q. I have no idea what turned him. I don’t trust Cates because of his ego.
Same for me, he was blocking people for asking about Q on the former Twitter. I'm glad he's come along but he may have used some research that anons did years ago. There are new eyes on now so I will welcome him to the great awakening.😏
I begrudgingly agree with you fren. I'm trying to remind my spirit that before Michael became Michelle, Saul became Paul.
Similar stance with me.
I've heard the accusatuons against Alex and Elon of being "controlled opposition" but even so, what they're doing is adding more eyes in what's really happening, and that in my eyes outweigh any potential psyops because the greatest strength of the baddies is staying hidden.
He's come a long way. He's even a bit less insufferable and more direct/not just talking down to his often-smarter-than-him audience these days.
yes, but we can all change. i think hes a good dude, friends with flynn it seems
I think he, and others, mocked Q openly, but not behind closed doors for two reasons… 1) needing to maintain relevance without being looked at as alex jones, 2) as he mentions jn his thread, any mention of Q meant instant ban on twitter 1.0… It wasnt the right time then
After looking at this new report of his, I have to give him respect for his work.
No matter what your previous thoughts on Cates are, he is laying it all out for the normies. Cates entire history of not only questioning Q but openly disparaging Q to being a fully awake anon posting Q, closely parallels the process of awakening among the normies. I have a suspicion it was all planned out this way and Cates has been a tool of the Patriots since the beginning that has now been fully activated.
This is the road map.
You answered my next questions:
Does he still have the same audience?
Is he waking them up?
Thanks
Yes. He's an idiot. And there's absolutely nothing new in this thread he posted. It's a recap of everything we already knew. If you're "oooing and ahhhing" over it, you should go read the drops
FFS dude. This isn't for us. It's for the normies.
Do a poll of 1000 normies and ask how many are following Brian Cakes on Twitter, then get back to me
so many drops sometimes it is nice to reread a summary of drops on a specific subject.
You're right, no doubt, anons did the heavy lifting on this back in the day.
You are not the audience.
Not sure if it is just me but I find X somewhat difficult to use. It shows you part of something, you click on "show more", then afterwards you go back and you're in some other part of the thread which you already saw, etc.
Twitter was originally designed for 160 character text messages to match the existing GSM mobile Short Message Service. I don't think it has evolved well to cope with long threads.