1
Monomial 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is possible. But once you have a system like this in place, it opens the possibility to come in later and have a less corrupt government, or even less corrupt courts, to use the number to verify citizenship and toss the illegal ballots.

Even if you don't tie the number to a particular ballot, if you can simply show that there was a significant number of non citizens voting it could be used as a basis for further reforms.

So I'm not really sure this would be a smart tactic for them. The current, completely blind voting environment, is obviously far superior from a fraud perspective.

1
Monomial 1 point ago +1 / -0

The point is that it WAS a unified country for thousands of years before the globalist cabal engineered its separation. And we can't move into an era of peace until that has been undone. Ultimately, it has to be reunified somehow, and I believe that is exactly what Trump and Xi talked about when he was there. Whatever happens, I'm convinced reunification with Taiwan is part of the plan.

5
Monomial 5 points ago +5 / -0

I have no idea how it will play out, but Taiwan is yet another of those globalist inspired "countries that isn't really an official country", just like Ukraine never registered its borders and officially remains an administrative district of the USSR, which was transferred to Russia.

There is no possibility we can enter a post war world without resolving the China/Taiwan reunification issue, and I don't see Xi or anyone in mainland China being willing to say that Taiwan isn't China.

They are going to have to reunify somehow. The white hats know this, so they obviously have a plan on how this is going to occur. I say sit back and watch without judgement, because it is likely part of the psyop we're living through.

As for the chip manufacturing industry, that just confirms my suspicion. They are moving high tech production out of Taiwan and into places like Arizona. Taiwan is going back to China one way or the other. Count on it.

6
Monomial 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't know why. This arrogance of this guy just bothers me. If you have a Twitter account, please vote your conscience in his poll.

4
Monomial 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's not a small task. You are talking about rewriting the entire work for hire legal code. There honestly is no difference between allowing another human to take over your position, or an AI. The fact that an AI is better and faster at mimicry really doesn't change anything.

The company paid you for your time while you were working there. You have no rights to work product beyond that compensation. Trying to legislate anything else would be nearly impossible at this point. It would be akin to doing away with employer/employee relationships altogether.

Arguably not a bad thing, but I don't see it happening.

2
Monomial 2 points ago +2 / -0

The issue is not now, nor has it ever been, about proven reserves. These are political attempts to obfuscate the problem. It has ALWAYS been about flow rates.

Oil doesn't exist as a puddle you suck out with a straw at any rate you want. It must be squeezed out through tiny fractures in a rock. And if you push with too much pressure, the water cuts through and the remaining oil gets stranded.

It annoys me that this has become such a political issue that nobody talks about the real challenges in this.

2
Monomial 2 points ago +2 / -0

The US has a long history of doing shady shit when it comes to apportioning representation. Let's never forget the abominable 3/5th's compromise. Slaves weren't considered people in any other circumstance, except when it came time to give Congressional seats. Slavery was completely wrong, but it was the hypocrisy here that really drives me nuts.

Yes. Only US citizens should be counted. Sadly, America has never actually done the consistent and rational thing in this case. Expect it to fail in the Senate.

1
Monomial 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are still talking/thinking about money like it is "something". Money is nothing but an abstract accounting system that tells you how much of the planet's aggregate resources you are allowed to have. Ultimately, people assign value to the specific barterable items based on their desirability at a specific moment in time (i.e. the price, which can and does fluctuate), and the accounting chits are appropriately marked. That can be by passing a paper note, updating a ledger, or flipping bits in a computer.

There is never, ever, EVER intrinsic value to money. It is always and everywhere ONLY an accounting system. A ledger. Just like Bitcoin.

Don't confuse money with barterability. They are not the same things.

4
Monomial 4 points ago +4 / -0

What "intrinsic value" backs an Excel spreadsheet? In ancient rural villages, what "intrinsic value" backed the ledger that the village headman kept saying who owed what? That is what crypto is. Nothing more than an incorruptible, digital ledger. It solves the Byzantine General's problem of trust.

The problem is thinking of any money as something of intrinsic value. It isn't. All money, fiat cash included, is merely an accounting mechanism that has value solely because people decide to give it value.

If you want intrinsic value, only direct barter can offer that. Even gold is just a rock. Nobody values a rock...they value what that rock represents, and it works as an accounting mechanism because of its intrinsic properties.

1
Monomial 1 point ago +2 / -1

Agree that Jeffries will likely win. But not because of the Uniparty. The white hats are coordinating this. It's all staged and scripted. There is a bunch of very bad stuff about to come to fruition, including multiple bank failures and economic collapse. This period of history has to be blamed on the Democrats.

Roll with it because it gets bumpy from here.

1
Monomial 1 point ago +1 / -0

But later, at 1:28 when he is talking about the 2 billion USD investment, he clearly says Pfizer. So what did he actually mean to say?

I'm not sure what to make of this.

2
Monomial 2 points ago +2 / -0

Flat out wrong. It's not a "bargain" we made. It was imposed upon us. Taxation without representation was the whole reason behind the founding of the USA. If the last few years have taught us anything, it is that WE haven't had a voice in anything that has happened. The cabal has engineered all of this, using fraudulent means as necessary, and they do it for their own benefit.

If you want to pay egregiously high taxes to a corrupt, satanic cabal, that is your choice. By all means keep doing it. But the rest of us don't. This is our country, and we're taking it back.

17
Monomial 17 points ago +18 / -1

Remember this is all scripted. The steal was allowed to happen in 2020 because that is what was necessary to advance the plot. I think we can safely assume that whatever is written in the script will happen this time as well.

I am surprised so many people still think any of this distraction is actually real. Oh, the pain and suffering is real, sure. But the major events are planned and engineered to prepare the population for phase 2. If Trump says that the narrative for 2024 is that it will not be stolen, then why would you doubt him? He's actually got the script. We're all just speculating.

BTW, don't get complacent thinking the next 4 years are going to be butterflies and rainbows. Trump's job is as a wrecking ball. Not a healer. What's coming in 2025-2028 is the total destruction of all those diseased institutions that can no longer serve us. That is going to be difficult and harsh. It's going to challenge America on a scale never before seen. The suffering and pain is going to get worse. You can bet the horror film they're screening for our benefit is far from over. And I guarantee there are more serious distractions planned to keep us occupied. Everything up until now has just been trailers.

Don't lose sight of the goal. The ride gets bumpy from here. But that doesn't mean we're off course.

3
Monomial 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is only 1 truth. But everyone has a preferred narrative that they use to selectively interpret data and ignore the points that don't fit. This isn't just a problem with the radical left. Flat Earther's, as one example, have this same tendency. I'm sure if we all look hard enough many can find examples in their own lives where they have done this.

But this identifies the real problem today...it's become too brazen and too many people are just willing to overlook obvious contradictions so they don't have to accept their narrative is flawed.

We all need to work on this if we are going to become a better species. That said, not everyone does this to the same degree. Certain people on the left are really the low hanging fruit here.

7
Monomial 7 points ago +7 / -0

If you feel that you need a law to protect Christianity, then maybe you don't understand what Christianity is.

The thing that separates Satanism from Christianity, or from any other religion for that matter, is not a rule or a law, but the fundamental axiom that you love others as you love yourself. Satanists don't love. They don't believe in love. Satanism can never and will never be equal to Christianity. You don't need a law to codify that. There isn't even a man made law that could codify that. You need your citizens of all faiths to know it in their hearts and live it daily. And if you do know it in your heart, then it doesn't matter what religion your neighbor is. He will respect your beliefs, and you will respect his.

Because as the Declaration of Independence tells us, we all have inalienable rights, and love requires those to be respected in others, as we demand they be respected for us. The Founding Fathers understood how dangerous a state mandated religion can be. No such mandate is necessary in America.

I have friends of many faiths. Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu and Agnostic. But we all share that fundamental understanding. And we all live in peace. Satanists won't last long in our reclaimed America.

4
Monomial 4 points ago +4 / -0

Should also add to this, a zombie amendment still out there was adopted in 1810, and has yet to be ratified but is still pending. This is the one that would cause anyone accepting a title of nobility to lose American citizenship.

Want to get rid of the BAR permanently? Just get your state legislature to ratify this amendment and say bye bye to lawyers. Esquire is a title of nobility, no matter what the fact checkers try and say. It can be done right now.

1
Monomial 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is true, but he's not proposing a constitutional convention. Just an amendment which needs to be adopted by Congress and then ratified by 38 states. The states either accept or reject the the exact amendment as written. If they try any funny business, it will be clearly written, and you only need 13 states to say no.

One interesting thing about amendments proposed in this way is if there is no time limit on ratification written into the amendment, it stays pending forever. It can be adopted by Congress now, and ratified hundreds of years in the future. The 27th amendment is an example of this in action. Adopted by the first Congress in 1789, it wasn't dusted off and ratified by the states until 1980, when they got tired of politicians voting themselves pay raises.

15
Monomial 15 points ago +15 / -0

It's an interesting development, but NOBODY except American citizens should be allowed to own land in the USA. Look around the world, and the vast majorities of the countries have this kind of restriction.

There is no reason to allow ownership of American real estate by any entity that isn't an American. Most countries allow foreigners to buy condos and that is it. The land has to be owned by a domestic entity. Foreigners or foreign juristic entities (companies > 50% owned by foreigners) can also lease land for a limited period of time if they want to build a factory and do business. Usually anywhere between 30-100 years.

I see no reason why this system shouldn't be adopted in the USA.

6
Monomial 6 points ago +6 / -0

The way this was implemented was extremely elegant. Nobody would have been able to find this. I think whoever discovered this was divinely inspired.

This has CIA/Mossad written all over it. Get your crypto off exchanges until the extent of this is known and patches have been put in place.

1
Monomial 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tend to agree. And the ship name being 'Dali', a famous city in China (Dali, China often called "Dalifornia") just seems to reinforce that suspicion.

4
Monomial 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think the real reason is so that the Democrats can pull a Gerald Ford and get the change of batter we're all waiting for. Install a new VP after Kamala resigns (requires consent of both houses). Then 25th Biden out of office, and you get anyone they want installed in the Whitehouse. Trump told us that the 25th amendment would be instrumental in Biden's term. We're running out of time for that to happen.

1
Monomial 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everyone is born into this world with dual loyalties. I love both my mother and father. And that continued even after they got divorced.

It's not dual loyalties that are the problem. It is the person who feigns loyalty to one at the expense of the other for personal gain.

1
Monomial 1 point ago +1 / -0

Context is important here.

Bitcoin Cash was the brainchild of ANT, the Chinese mining equipment manufacturer. The reason it rubbed so many the wrong way was because of this. I went to the mining conference in Georgia (the country, not the state) back in 2018, and it was embarrassing how hard they were pushing this.

When you have a group that is basically pushing the little guy out of the mining space in favor of large, centralized mining farms, you can imagine that their ideas of what "Satoshi wanted" are going to be rejected by the vast majority.

BSV, the brainchild of the scam artist Craig Wright, also met a similar fate. I have a difficult time when people push propaganda onto those just discovering Bitcoin without having lived through the experience. The fact is BTC survived in its current form with SegWit because it was good enough and because it was being promoted by the guys who were, at least in theory, trying to argue for the original goals of decentralization.

As for not being a competitor to Visa for point of sale transactions, it was never meant to be. It was meant to be a replacement for the banking SWIFT and ACH system. By design Bitcoin requires at least 30 minutes to confirm a transaction. That was a good deal faster than the days it was taking an ACH to clear back in 2009, and even the 24 hours a wire transfer could take. And it was much cheaper as well.

This idea that Bitcoin was supposed to compete in the retail marketplace was something added later by people trying to stretch it into service for something it was never designed to do. That's when we got lightning network and all kinds of alternative crypto currencies with faster confirmation times. Bitcoin remains as a system for large money transfers, not for small retail transactions.

So a lot of what is said above is just propaganda reinterpreted by someone trying to push a particular agenda. It doesn't actually align with what really happened on the ground back in 2017 when all this was going down.

view more: Next ›