1
winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

First of all, no German ever referred to themselves as "Nazis." This was an insult coined by a jewish propagandist.

The term "Nazi" began to be widely used in the early 1930s, shortly after the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) came to power in Germany. The term was initially used by political opponents of the party as a way to mock its members and their ideology. However, it eventually became widely adopted as a shorthand for the party and its ideology, both by its opponents and supporters. By the mid-1930s, the term was in common use in both English and German, which pre-dates the publication of this book by enough of a margin for me to discard this point.

Secondly, during this period, fascism was not the evil associated with that form of government today. Following the destruction and ashes of Weimar, fascism was the most efficient method to restore Germany, and this form of government was supported by its populace.

In 1942, the popularity of fascism continued to decline in many countries, particularly as the tide of the war began to turn against the Axis powers. The military failures of fascist regimes such as Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, combined with the atrocities committed by these regimes, contributed to a growing sense of disillusionment among the general population. Additionally, the propaganda efforts of the Allied powers, which portrayed fascist regimes as oppressive and tyrannical, further contributed to the decline in popularity of fascism. By 1942, many people had come to view fascism as an inherently flawed and dangerous form of government. Furthermore, one must also consider that Nazi Germany was not the target audience for this book, so the author's opposition to what they still viewed as a good form of government is not at all surprising.

I found while reading through this document, that much of what was claimed against Hitler was innuendo, just because he used similar language of groups previous to his rise to power. You can't make such a leap in logic to then conclude that he must have had help or influence from these groups just because some words he used in Mein Kampf were similar.

Correct, those findings are circumstantial. Add to your brain-folder, there may come a time you run across further evidence. There is much to be declassified.

I can tell you that Hitler did have the support from the pope and the Vatican during this time, but probably more because the Vatican wanted to align itself with what it perceived as the "winning side" at the time, and someone that matched their core values. The Vatican didn't want to lose either infrastructure or the revenue from parishioners. We can see this in the included quote from Bishop Hudal on page 33.

Quite a striking statement! (I have already moved way beyond the "probably more because" speculative checkpoint, but that's fine) again I only present these things for people to consider. I've basically come to my conclusions though, and as I refine them, or forsake them, I'll adjust my speech accordingly in the future.

Thank you for the discussion! I'd love to continue if you are willing. I am going to read the things you posted and get back to you on them.

I will admit to not studying all the source material cited in the document. It does seem to condemn the Jesuits as a "Trojan Horse" infecting Catholicism, and this much is true. The jewish influence in the Jesuits is well-known: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1163/j.ctt1w8h1xm But again, I caution that this document is clever propaganda. From page 43: "The crusades of the Middle Ages also began with persecution of the Jews..." The old, "feel sorry for me" trick. Jews were persecuted, yes, but only because of their refusal to assimilate into other cultures/nations, but also because of ritual child sacrifice, usury, and other anti-social behavior. (And yes, I can provide documentation of all this as well.)

The Jesuits are not some blight upon Rome, no matter what deception they put out to create that distance. Mystery Babylon loves its Jesuits, and anybody else willing to give their life for the Babylonian causes.

As to Jews engaged in Babylonian Mystery Religious practices such as human sacrifice I don't dispute it---I simply include them within the Babylonian framework, which is headquartered in Rome and has been since before Christ came, though at the time it was a pagan system appearing as such. Today it has "the appearance of a lamb" (Christ). These people will use literally anything to further the agenda, including their own fellow-satanists to justify them taking more power (referring to your remark about the crusades and Babylonian Talmudic Jews)

1
winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alright, I'll check it out and try the other later (my internet is acting shit atm, not just that site)

In the meantime I will also present you this to counter: https://ia804502.us.archive.org/15/items/BehindTheDictators/BehindTheDictators.pdf

1
winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't get the site to load. Can you give me a tl:dr or is that not feasable?

1
winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Ordo ad chao" among other reasons

1
winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

motive: unified one world order under Rome, just like "the good ol' days"!

When the "deadly wound" was inflicted on the papacy in the late 1800's, that being the cessation of diplomatic relations with the USA (due to the Jesuit involvement in the Lincoln assassination), and the papal states dissolved at the "Capture of Rome", they lost their political power.

They want that shit back more than anything.

How can the anti-christ be a "king of kings" if the kings of the earth no longer bow to his authority?!

0
winn 0 points ago +1 / -1

Da Joos just work for em! kek!

[Rome]

[Babylon the Great]

[Rome]

[Babylon the Great]

[Rome]

[Babylon the Great]

[Rome]

[Babylon the Great]

[Rome]

[Babylon the Great]

[Rome]

[Babylon the Great]

[Rome]

[Babylon the Great]

[Rome]

[Babylon the Great]

[Rome]

[Babylon the Great]

[Rome]

[Babylon the Great]

[Rome]

[Babylon the Great]

[Rome]

[Babylon the Great]

[Rome]

[Babylon the Great]

[Rome]

[Babylon the Great]

[Rome]

[Babylon the Great]

[Rome]

[Babylon the Great]

I won't relent! Now express your disapproval, knights! You're so cute when you crusade!

3
winn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now you know why two things are so often seen together:

  • Jews are the head of the cabal, Hitler did nothing wrong

and

  • We need a God-Emperor theocracy, pepe-crusader memes, Roman / Latin usernames on Gab and PDW, Catholics in Action Nick Fuentes glowtards "RACE WAR NOW!" blacks are low IQ, shit-skin n***ers, white ethno-state now!!

....

"Corporate needs you to tell the difference between these two pictures"

-"They are the same picture..."

2
winn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trace globohomo beliefs and practices:

From the Tower of Babel

To the nations once God scattered the peoples there

To Israel when they adopted the practices from Babylon, as well as from other nations (she "played the harlot")

To Medo-Persia, then Greece..

Culminating:

At Rome, or Babylon The Great, "MYSTERY BABYLON, MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS IN THE EARTH", or the "source from which it all came", with her "God-Emperor" ceaser and then papacy, who, like Nimrod, ruled the world, a "king of kings"

And yeah Israel, or some of them, especially as you climb the tops of influence (as usual!) Not all Israel are of Israel" as Paul said.

As the forces of evil unite against God's people.....

https://files.catbox.moe/3xfcpk.jpeg

https://files.catbox.moe/yaicm2.pdf

^pages 49 - 64

3
winn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Paparazzi

Paparazzi are independent photographers who take pictures of celebrities, prominent public figures, and other high-profile people, typically going about their daily life routines. They make a living by selling their photographs to media outlets that focus on tabloid journalism and sensationalism, such as gossip magazines.

AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.

...

paparazzi (n.) 1961, from Italian Paparazzo (plural paparazzi) surname of the freelance photographer in Federico Fellini's 1959 film "La Dolce Vita."The surname itself is of no special significance in the film; it is said to be a common one in Calabria, and Fellini is said to have borrowed it from a travel book, "By the Ionian Sea," in which occurs the name of hotel owner Coriolano Paparazzo. ---> yeah I bet, what a convenient cover story. Any Italians in here can tell me what the suffix -razzi or -razzo mean? translate.google thinks it's Croatian or some shit. I know what "papa" means....

...

I'm convinced that the "paparazzi" are merely "watchmen" working for the [cabal], whether the actual photographers know it or not, to make sure their minions (celebrities and anyone famous really) cannot go off in secret to do something "unsanctioned" by them, such as ask for help or meet in a SCIF, without these blowhards blabbing to the world what they're doing, where they go, who they meet etc.

2
winn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Babylonian garbage, filtered through the sands of time, alllllll the way to present-day globohomo orgs, via....

1
winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

LOL WE CAN'T HAVE NOTHIN NICE, WE JUST KEEP USING IT FOR THE TRUTH! SO DESPERATE 🤡🤡🤡🤡

2
winn 2 points ago +3 / -1

oooooh! Go go go go! Babylon!

Trace globohomo beliefs and practices:

From the Tower of Babel

To the nations once God scattered the peoples there

To Israel when they adopted the practices from Babylon, as well as from other nations (she "played the harlot")

To Medo-Persia, then Greece..

Culminating:

At Rome, or Babylon The Great, "MYSTERY BABYLON, MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS IN THE EARTH", or the "source from which it all came", with her "God-Emperor" ceaser and then papacy, who, like Nimrod, ruled the world, a "king of kings"

And yeah Israel, or some of them, especially as you climb the tops of influence (as usual!) Not all Israel are of Israel" as Paul said.

As the forces of evil unite against God's people.....

https://files.catbox.moe/3xfcpk.jpeg

https://files.catbox.moe/yaicm2.pdf

^pages 49 - 64

1
winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is at the heart of the abuse. These corporations got so big by colluding with the gov't so along with the "Internet Bill of Rights" (aka just applying the already existing rights to us bc the internet is public owned since it was made using tax dollars thru black money projects) the same could be said about these mega corporations

1
winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

but it's like they're not only taking what you make, they're also creating a profile on the creator and taking that. It's like a form of plagarism! They're using you to train your replacement. Idk it just seems wrong

1
winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't have time right now is why, I'll keep this tab up though and check it out. It would be nice if you can give me his answer beforehand, because I may have already gone down this viewpoint rabbit hole. In the last few years I've heard a wide array on the topic

2
winn 2 points ago +2 / -0

can I skip the 3.5 hr long video and cut to the chase: the Papacy, including every pope, is the anti-christ and always has been.

Merger of Church and State, "God-Emperor" ceaser-priest, who rules over the kings of the earth until the Capture of Rome in 1870 (deadly wound) which effectively removed the Papacy's political power (for a season). You will say "Paul said the MAN of sin in 2 Thess. 3!" and I would say:

the word "man" in 2 Thess. 2:3 can also be used to refer to a GROUP or CLASS of men! Hello papacy! "Men of sin"

444 (anthrōpos) relates to both genders (male and female) as both are created in the image of God – each equally vested with individual personhood and destiny (cf. Gal 3:28). Accordingly, the Bible uses 444 (ánthrōpos) of a specific man, woman, or class (type, group) of people – i.e. mankind in general (inclusive of every man, woman and child; see also 1 Cor 11:7). (435 /anḗr specifically refers to a male and 1135 /gynḗ to a female.)

https://biblehub.com/greek/444.htm

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/2_thessalonians/2-3.htm

The "son of perdition", rather, the class of men who [5207 hyiós – properly, a son (by birth or adoption); (figuratively) anyone sharing the same nature as their Father.] share the same nature as "destruction, ruin, loss, perishing; eternal ruin." (apóleia)

The "Dark Ages" sure saw a lot of that! More than any other time in history.

4Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.

No "group or class of men" fit it better!

An informative summation can be found here:

https://files.catbox.moe/yaicm2.pdf

pages 49 - 64

1
winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice. I just found this book, have to read the rest of it. There's more by the author also on the topic, it was apparantly a widely-known thing during the Reformation until Jesuit-infiltrated seminaries and bible translation teams + fake Vatican-made manuscripts caused the Protestant world to become "drunk with the wine of her fornication", false doctrines which can be traced back to the Tower of Babel, which first spread around the nations after God confused their tongues, then made their way into Israel, who played the harlet with those nations and adopted their Babylonian practices and beliefs, and then finally culminated in Rome via Medo-Persia and Greece, and in A.D. throughout the Dark Ages unto this present day, has trickled down into all the globohomo power centers such as WEF, CIA, WHO blah blah etc. and from them via "pastors", Hollywood / Entertainment world, MSM, sports, big medicine, big food, big tech, astroturfed internet glowtards etc to us in various forms.

This is of course quite reductive but is the general flowchart of Babylonian Mystery religions from Nimrod, the first "God-Emperor" unto today, with the now weakened Papacy (deadly wound healed with the creation of Vatican City and then the re-establishing of diplomatic relations with the Vatican under Reagan in 1984)

view more: Next ›