This situation parallels the choice between Barry Sotero and Pierre Delecto in the 2011 election; neither choice suffices.
Steve Garvey is a very poor choice for US Senator. The man's policies manifest a hybrid of John Kerry and Mitt Romney almost literally. Garvey appears as a bizarro world mirror image of Pencil Neck Schiff. Eric Early is a better choice for Senator whose platform serves California state citizens as Americans.
"But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise. He chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong" (1 Corinthians 1:27 Easy-to-Read Version).
Now one can cross reference with the howbadismybatch.com website.
California has a deficit closer to $1 trillion. The unionized public employees have unfunded liabilities manifested in bloated salaries and pensions. Scoundrels like Gavin Nuisance and his predecessor Jerry Brown guarantee public service contracts in exchange for block votes. For example, the boondoggle of the slow speed rail pays for the unionized public transportation employees' pensions and salaries; this scam explains why California has the highest gas prices in the country. Environmentalism serves as the pretense to extort the California State citizens into using public transportation. Governor Nuisance rewards the inferior public service based on laziness, incompetence, and complacency coupled with absolute corrupt election to secure political power.
The Salvation Army has another alias known as "The Red Shield." The name Rothschild means "red shield" literally. There are no coincidences.
No James O'Keefe = Pfizer Veritas
Remember the post with picture of a man crossing the street in some Chinese city? That man may have been Hunter Biden.
The mother of the daughter protests in favor of abortion 30 years ago. The daughter defends abortion 30 years later. One giving birth to the other refutes the ideology of abortion.
"NOBODY has the right to use your body, against your will, even to save their life [sic], or the life of another person… Denying women the right to abortion means they have less bodily autonomy than a corpse"
The argument above constitutes the fallacy of false equivalency. The first sentence presents the unstated assumption of pregnancy threatening the life of a woman inherently. Such a proposition provides an excuse for an abortion since any danger remains unknown until further development of the fetus. The first sentence expresses a statement analogous to, "You cannot force me to give birth to save the life of the baby because it will kill me." The first sentence equates birth to death.
The second sentence perpetuates the fallacy further. Does the fetus have the unalienable human right to life? If no, the mother practices hypocrisy by denying and disparaging the same right of the fetus for expedience. If yes, she can proceed with the birth and give the baby up for adoption. The second sentence states essentially, "A living fetus has equal 'bodily autonomy' to a corpse because of the right to abortion." However, the fetus possesses the same unalienable human right to life as the mother. The second sentence equates the right to life of a fetus with a corpse whose same right ends at death.
You can save the life of a fetus in the womb without compromising the safety of the mother. In contrast, you cannot save the life of a human who dies except to salvage organs with consent prior to death. The donations of blood and marrow originates out of the living, whereas organs have a timeframe for usage if donated after death. The conception of a living human being in the womb has no equivalence to a corpse and the action of donating blood or transplanting marrow, organs, et cetera.
"What happens if our corrupt and illegitimate Congress makes [a mandate] law?"
Congress can never pass an unconstitutional law. A legislative body whether local, state, or federal will pass unconstitutional items of legislation—bills, acts, statutes, ordinances, codes, regulations, mandates, policies, et cetera—and enforce them under false pretense or color of law. Congress would have to commit treason against The United States Constitution openly by overturning all legal precedents or federal case laws of the judiciary branch. Congress must breach the separation of powers and seize jurisdiction of the judiciary branch to establish cause for violating the supreme law of the land.
Any legislative body or unelected de facto bureaucracy—CIA, DOJ, FBI, FDA, CDC, DMV, et cetera—declares open war or treason against The Constitution with unconstitutional items of legislation. For in what section or clause of any law state or federal is giving Congress or any bureaucracy precedence legal, jurisdiction, and cause to violate rights unalienable, civil, constitutional and The Constitution?
"A legislative act contrary to the Constitution is not law. . . [An] act of the Legislature repugnant to the Constitution is void" (Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137, 177).
"An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed" (Norton v. Shelby County, 118 US 425, 442).
"Undoubtedly, the State, when providing by legislation for the protection of the public health, the public morals, or the public safety, is subject to the paramount authority of the Constitution of the United States, and may not violate rights secured or guaranteed by that instrument, or interfere with the execution of the powered confided to the General Government" (Mugler v. Kansas, 123 US 623, 663).
The mandate of vaccinations can never be a law. No branch of government—state or federal—can pass and enforce any item of legislation under color of law—bills, orders, mandates, regulations, codes, et cetera—in violation of rights unalienable, constitutional, and civil. "A law repugnant to the Constitution is void" (Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137, 180 (1803)).
"Undoubtedly the State, when providing by legislation for the protection of the public health, the public morals, or the public safety, is subject to the paramount authority of the Constitution of the United States, and may not violate rights secured or guaranteed by that instrument" (Mugler v. Kansas, 123 US 623, 663 (1887)).
"A county or city may make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws" (Article XI §7 of the California State Constitution).
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof [federal case laws aforementioned]; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land" (Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the United States Constitution).
The Chinese spies in the legislative branch of the US Government appear to push the $3.5 trillon infrastructure bill as a pretext for a bailout of China. Think about the green energy contracts given to bidders using materials "Made in China." Think about the Chinese funding the pensions of public works monopolies like Caltrans in California at the state level. Government contracts whether state or federal spend tax revenue for infrastructure projects reliant on Chinese imports. China needs passage of the infrastructure bill to prevent an economic collapse similar to the one experienced under the first term of Barack Obama.
"We're number one in job creation" (Newsom @ 1:10 in the video).
- This statement may be true for the public sector only.
"80 plus billion dollar surplus" (Newsom @1:41 in the video).
- This statement cannot be true when the State of California has a debt of $2 to $3 trillion accrued mostly in unfunded liabilities of salaries and pensions for public employees.
Such a fact accounts for the highest taxation in the nation. For example, the California state citizen pays the highest gas prices in the nation to subsidize the mid five digit salary—$50,000 and above— of public transportation drivers operating empty buses, metro rails, et cetera for most of the business day. The public sector runs "in the red" or at a loss in revenue. The public sector in the State of California exemplify the Welfare Elite of the United States.
Allopathic or "pharma-funded" doctors and Pablo Escobar are drug dealers.
Liberals advocate gun control to prevent gun violence. They scapegoat firearms—inanimate objects—for the violence of criminals. The action of the newspaper proves the failure of gun control. The newspaper protects the suspect committing gun violence under the false pretense of "perpetuating stereotypes." The liberal newspaper commits tacit admission of the failure of the social sciences, social justice, et cetera to solve criminality in society.
Tenth Amendment of The United States Constitution:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The States of the southern border have the lawful power and right to construct the wall with or without support of the federal government.
"I don't accept the 'this is a war' disclaimer. You can't intentionally target non-combatants in war" (AFChiefRet).
- The history of war refutes such a statement. The phrase "collateral damage" serves as the pretense and euphemism for targeting non-combatants intentionally and inexorably. Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Dresden manifest three examples only.
"You expect me to believe that anyone who wore a mask or took the jab isn't a Patriot?" (AFChiefRet).
- The rhetorical question reveals the unstated assumption that patriots can compromise their conviction. The mask can serve as a subterfuge or a means to an end expediently. In contrast, patriots target themselves as non-combatants by taking the vaccine intentionally. The actions political of Donald Trump bears no fault or responsibility for the choice of patriots to become casualties of the vaccine.
Such coordination or collusion violates Article I §10 Clause 3 in The Constitution of The United States. "No State shall… enter into any agreement or Compact with another State." The Secretaries of State in Arizona, Nevada, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia war against "the supreme Law of the Land."