Slavery versus Freedom… As a Man I’d Die for my Family, not for my Job… What don’t Feminists Understand ?? 🤔
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Yes, from husband. If husband would respect wife's home contribution, that respect would be more satisfying that a wage. But it doesn't seem to happen very much. Most husbands seem to resent stay-at-home wives and see them as a burden. I've seen it in my social circles.
Young children probably prefer to be at home, but only as adults would they ever think to thank their mother for being there for them.
Is this a general complaint, or a personal one?
In my experience, it’s mostly been other women who belittle mothers who don’t work for men other than their husbands.
This is a slave system mechanic.
Divided you are weak.
"See how indoctrination and propaganda work ?"
Bingo.
Its because women stopped contributing beyond the children.
Back in the 17 and 1800s, the wives would be at home tending to home affairs - sewing, laundry washing, food preparation, cleaning, and so forth. A man would come home from soul crushing back breaking labor and his wife would be soul crushed and back broken, also.
Since the 1910s or so, the work of maintaining a home has steadily shrunk. You no longer make your own clothes, no longer have to spend all day making a meal, no longer have to scrub laundry on a board.
Including children, it takes about 3-4 hours a day to tend the house. Without children it can probably be done in one.
And when the man gets home, it's all drama. Fix dinner some days each week.Then it's fix the appliances. Tend the yard on the weekend. You, know, the "man's work". None of that was taken over to keep the house running smoothly.
Boys turning to men get tired of providing it all and getting nothing out of it. Especially if there is financial hardship from having a single income.
Girls ruined the boys that became men for themselves when they became women.
This answer is neither entirely wrong nor right.
There are considerations here but it’s not the answer.
There are always considerations.
But this is the trend. If you want to solve a problem, you can't ignore why it exists in the first place.
Yes, there used to be real skills involved in home-making: as you say clothes, appliances like washing machines and electric stoves (rather than wood stoves). Cooking from scratch is a rarity, as is freezing or canning.
De-skilling the work of home-making is also a part of this phenomenon; again, this leads to women wanting to make a contribution in the work-world rather than at home.
Martha Stewart, for one, with her "Martha Stewart Living" TV show and magazine, did a good service by highlighting all the creative things you can do around the house to make it more of a home. More recognition for the skills involved would really help encourage them.
Arts and crafts can't really replace home care and textiles.
I have seen murder and mayhem , but chose to be better than that.
Sounds like you may have the Actress gene......'I need ADULATION NOW !'
They say that generous parents make for selfish children. So yes, one does have to train children in how to be thankful. But that's not the main point.
Back to the opening meme: "Feminism: the belief that serving one's family is slavery but serving one's employer is freedom".
What is slavery? Work without compensation.
If a stay-at-home mother gets no recognition or appreciation for what she does from her husband, she is getting no compensation for the work she does. So ya, technically, it is "slavery".
Or at least it makes it understandable why she would want to get a job.
No one wants to be taken advantage of.
Nope , Involuntary " Work without compensation." Some don't have the heart of a servant. To god or anyone else.
Always Chose Wisely.