1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not “need” for them, “need” for us.

It’s also a lesser justification than even compatibility. “Learn to do things yourself” and “they can be compatible over there”. Those were just presented as minimum baselines that we don’t currently have, not necessarily good justifications.

Conditional family unification might be another reason. Plenty of people want that. Others don’t. It’s dangerously close to “let’s give all the DREAMERS citizenship” and brings into question “who are Americans” and “who should be allowed to bring over their families.” Much as we probably don’t like them, there are some complicated considerations at this point.

We need actual representation, actual debate, and actual knowledge of who is even here (did anyone else try looking at the 2020 census and notice how hard it was to find and that the data was difficult to understand?) to determine what’s in all of our best interests, which we don’t currently have. How many H1Bs are here and own prime real estate and businesses? How many people who actually hate what America is supposed to be have been given citizenship (possibly by others who agree with them who were also given citizenship)?

Take a look around at how many mosques and hindu temples, among other religions, have been built here. What are all those peoples’ statuses? What should be done about that? The current wave of intentionally population displacing immigration isn’t the first one, it seems to be at least the third, if not more than that.

Basically, it’s a mess.

8
AmateurExpert 8 points ago +8 / -0

It’s not even that. It’s that they’re trying to put people here under their control system.

The UN migration program has nothing to do with American immigration laws.

American immigration laws, especially if we get the government back under control, would take compatibility or at least need into account. The UN migration program is about creating chaos, and targets every country, not just America.

14
AmateurExpert 14 points ago +14 / -0

They didn’t sell us out, they were always intended to be a weapon of the enemy. Go read the “human rights” definition they use. It’s insane.

I found some windows into some of the organizations doing the legwork in a thread of u/Winn a few weeks ago. It’s worth digging into.

https://greatawakening.win/p/17sOZcZqQr/x/c/4Z8inFV3HFM

If you want who sold us out, it’s the corporate church.

50 pieces of silver much, Judas?

My suggestion is that we have to let them know they’re committing crimes, allow them to repent, get the names of the people they are working with, and work this like a RICO case ourselves.

People here need to understand this is not going away and start sounding the alarm bells and coming up with action plans. They do not intend to stop, ever.. That means we have to stop them, legally.

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +2 / -0

This answer is neither entirely wrong nor right.

There are considerations here but it’s not the answer.

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +2 / -0

In my experience, it’s mostly been other women who belittle mothers who don’t work for men other than their husbands.

This is a slave system mechanic.

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are lazy stay at home moms. There are diligent stay at home moms. There are diligent stay at home moms who run side gigs to bring in some spare change.

There are lazy husbands. There are diligent husbands. There are lazy employees. There are diligent employees.

Laziness shouldn’t be rewarded. Diligence should. Doesn’t matter where at.

Now, the idea that stay .. at. ..

..

“Stay at home” is the exact same damn thing as “cis-gender”. They made up a freaking term and hypnotized us with it to get us to argue about things that don’t exist.

“There are moms who stay at home. There are moms who work in offices. There are wives who work for their husbands. There are wives who work for other men.”

This is witchcraft. Break the spells.

The terms are “wife”, “mother”, “matriarch”, “queen”.

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even CNN today was like “this is a bit much.”

“Yeah uh. It reminds me of the Obama bush I uh.. I like things a bit different.”

“Yeah, yeah, uh, different! Different is good!”

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here’s a question - if we shouldn’t try sticking around till the bitter end, as was suggested to me the other day, what’s the quickest way to sell a DRS’ed stock when the time comes?

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

This. I looked all over and didn’t see how to do it.

Mind you it might have been because I kept stopping my search to eat more crayons.

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

What’s S-3ASR? Also, why would anyone buy the rest of Teddy with GME in play?

Long term value?

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not me. I’ve been trying to find this too and just reposted.

5
AmateurExpert 5 points ago +5 / -0

If you go back in history, bad management was trying to crash the company, which is how we go here to begin with.

If you look at what’s going on, it doesn’t matter if the company has long term growth potential or not. It’s completely irrelevant.

  • They’ve shorted vastly more shares than exist, which .. shorting itself imo should probably be illegal .. but this should definitely be highly illegal. They’re effectively diluting ownership of the company with ZERO accountability - it is outright theft from every single stockholder with no defense.
  • We are told that market prices are set in part by supply and demand, yet as demand goes up and supply goes down and vastly more people buy than sell, the price cuts itself in more than half anyway. The price should not be going down, and even if it were to do so (because it is supposedly set by the last sale price) it definitely should not be going down this much.

None of what you said is relevant except to the people who make up nonsense stories on tv to explain why market manipulation moved the stock price how it moved. They don’t actually know, they’re just making it up to drive buy and sell demand in the direction they’re told.

GameStop is about the last place to buy physical games. Physical ownership is great, that’s why The Evil Empire, Microsoft wants to get rid of it. The move away from physical on all things retail isn’t organic, it’s engineered. Everything about this is engineered. Their engineering can go to hell.

This whole thing is about a counterattack against the ways we are actively, strategically, intentionally being attacked. Plain and simple.

We win, they lose, when does the game stop?

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

I.e. YOLO your HODL up by 50%.

MOOOOOOOOOOON

If the market works how they say it works, you don’t have 80% buy 20% sell and the price drops by half.

RIGGED

VOTE COUNTS DON’T GO DOWN OR VERTICALLY UP

RIGGED RIGGED RIGGED RIGGERS GONNA RIG

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I’m not either. Kinda refuse to claim a “denomination”, just ideas.

The days they did do just seem to have been a practice. I don’t know how they go t to that, but it strikes me as a good one.

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://biblereasons.com/reasons-for-fasting/

Not mentioned is that the commandment for the Day of Atonement is to fast. “Afflict yourselves”.

Leviticus 23:26-32.

To be clear, I am a Christian who believes most of the Old Testament should still be followed (some parts can’t be), and that while following it does not earn salvation (that’s done through grace), not following it sure seems to eventually lead to condemnation (per looking around at anything right now).

Early Christians fasted because the Old Testament commands us to fast, and they followed what it said, including Jesus himself, who was called by John, “the Logos made flesh”. The Logic of creation itself.

https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/69513/when-did-the-early-church-begin-and-end-their-twice-weekly-fasts#69519

As with the drops of this board, don’t take my word for it but confirm things for yourself by researching the scriptures and other primary sources.

Edit: also it was wednesdays and fridays but that was just what they did, not proscribed.

5
AmateurExpert 5 points ago +5 / -0

Some might call the annual fast.. “Day of Atonement”.

Just throwing it out there.

Biblically proscribed by God himself, who is just, righteous, and all scripture is breathed by inspiration of God, and profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, and instruction in righteousness.

Life in abundance.

Christians all used to fast twice a week - Tuesdays and Thursdays, I believe it was.

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah “don’t trust AA” seems like the way to go

Doesn’t mean I’m right but lots of signs on that one.

3
AmateurExpert 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol gotta love the downvotes lately. KEEP CRYING, EVIL ONES.

Kinda nice to see that one in a way though. I wasn’t 100% positive I wasn’t going too far on some comments or something, and I may have yet done so, but they’re downvoting prayer groups.

Somebody is obviously just mad about truth and righteousness at that point.

Downdoot armor on!

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, so how do you DRS, stepwise, if the GME is in an IRA?

It sounds like it requires setting up a holding corporation, but the specifics aren’t clear. That’s not exactly the sort of thing that your everyday crayon eating ape does.

view more: Next ›