I wouldn't say I'm "falling for it", but simply recognizing that language matters, and that ridding language of implicit subservience is part of achieving agency.
Consent:
- Acceptance or approval of what is planned or done by another; acquiescence. synonym: permission.
- Agreement as to opinion or a course of action.
If someone classifies another as "elite", and said elite considers themselves so, that would be an agreement as to opinion. It's the more archaic definition, but these power structures have been around a long time...
Even phrases such as "them" and "us/our" are disempowering, because it ties a person who desires agency with people they believe do not.
A person can't change their state if their language contains them.
But once it's no longer hidden, it would be a form of consent though, aye?
For example, if a group of slaves decided to overthrow their master, they might identify him as "master" for a while, out of habit. But if they had success in achieving their freedom they would at some point no longer refer to him as "master".
I think free-will-of-choice is helping us to understand that the words we use and how we frame our circumstances, both determine our status in the world.
So when the term "deep state" is used, we in a sense speak and consent a higher power into existence. By identifying it as something beyond our control we've already lost the battle (will to fight). I think terms like "legacy media" are the way to break out of this kind of thinking.
TBH free-will-of-choice should have some sort of icon on their name. Lots of great word analysis in their post history...
Thx for this fren. There are so many antagonistic entities above/around/among us that it becomes hard to separate and it's a good exercise to step back and really attempt to sort out what's what.
Why does Pike stand out so much from these other leaders we never hear about?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Council,Scottish_Rite(Southern_Jurisdiction,_USA)
https://www.nnscottishrite.org/commander-and-deputy
In the Illuminati card game you have The Bavarian Illuminati, The Discordian Society, The UFOs, The Servants of Cthulhu, The Bermuda Triangle, and The Gnomes of Zürich, who I suppose are to represent these competing factions?
Yeah very doable but I think we may want to prepare for the possibility that Trump is not on the ballot as an R and we have to do write-ins.
TBH it makes so much sense that I'd be shocked if that wasn't the outcome.
Firstly, it's important for conservatives to understand that the Republican party is filled with traitors. Not just in the sense of policy, but genuine McCain grade treason is widespread. White hats need people to understand that voting is not enough, and that we need to take the reigns of our government rather than deferring.
Secondly, voting machine fraud is still out there. Hand counts are the only way to ensure a fair vote. Forcing all Trump voters to do a write-in makes that easy to accomplish.
The RNC kicking Trump off the ballot accomplishes both these tasks.
Good Change = GC
GC = FBI General Counsel
Maybe wants us to read up on the history of the General Counsel position? It's pretty juicy:
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/20/fbi-discrimination-case-00087650
And looks like some of what's going on is being covered up as a sexual harassment/discrimination sort of thing, rather than the more likely explanation of white hat vs. cabal turf war.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_E._Caproni
Looks like a man.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_L._Wainstein
Preceded them and was one of the people who stated Trump was unfit to serve.
Larry R. Parkinson has no info.
Howard Shapiro -- ok this one is interesting. He tipped off the Clintons about an investigation into them and was subsequently fired.
https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/05/21/email/shapiro.fbi/
His quote in leaving was also fascinating, why did he emphasize the women in the FBI first?
"It was a privilege to have worked with Louie Freeh and the fine women and men of the FBI."
Richard J. Salgado -- was interim, is it this guy? https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/10-31-17%20Salgado%20Testimony.pdf
Thomas Collingwood -- not seeing anything interesting, seems to have left after 9/11
Beyond that things start to get blurry to the point that the AI might be making people up...
Carlisle Hubbard?
Herman Phleger?
I've been following the DNC machinations in response to the timing of their convention relative to Ohio election law and basically from an event planning standpoint it's not possible to move the convention. People have hotels & flights book, catering, etc.
What they ended up doing was scheduling an online meeting in advance to nominate their POTUS candidate. So something like that could be done.
It's a pander op.
There was probably a legitimate bill brought forward that the cabal needed to railroad so they initiated this pander op. Look for recently sidelined LA bills and you'll likely see what they really feared.
I checked the archive earlier and found nothing. Seems to be a nothing burger.
Don't know why everyone is excited. Feels like no one is staying frosty...
https://archive.ph/pGzqY
https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/judicialdirectory/JudicialDirectory?2
https://web.archive.org/web/20230331232810/https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/judicialdirectory/Bio?judge_id=Jvv5ZfC8zLC57yZndmF4ow%3D%3D