Parental care and affection for children is NOT the same as the care and affection between two romantic or sexual partners.
But the lines have been deliberately blurred through the use of language to remove the distinction between the two.
Part of the long-term plan to normalize the sexualization of children.
You said it yourself: A husband doesn't mind being INFANTILIZED by his wife.
Don't feel the need to defend it just because you use the term.
So do I. We all do.
That's the whole point: It's so culturally-embedded in our psyche that it doesn't even seem weird, when it is.
Anyway, just throwing it out there.
We can agree to disagree.
As good as it is that this stuff is starting to come out now, the whole "gee whiz, how about that?" act as if it wasn't PLAINLY OBVIOUS FROM DAY ONE that the scamdemic was a coordinated attack on the world, is...frustrating, to say the least.
I've seen this going around, but as someone who has spent a fair bit of time mirroring images, I have to say there is nothing special about this particular 'hidden image'.
The effect happens with virtually every image.
Mirror some photos of yourself and you will see sinister looking pareidolic faces appear.
That's not to say such images cannot, or are not, embedded in photos in this way, but this one is pretty run-of-the-mill and unimpressive as far as it goes.
Topics of discussion:
-
Is Jim Carrey (in his rubber mask) getting carried away in his portrayal of the President?
-
Does the Constitution allow for JFK Jr. and Princess Diana to become King and Queen of the United States?
-
Will Michael Jackson return as Secretary of the Arts under the next Trump Administration?
For sure.
Everyone does it.
But when you step back and look at it, it is pretty weird that we do it.