You may have heard us discussing various legislation that exists to protect our rights and to preserve our existing legislation, and that this is why the Trudeau has not been able to implement Federal law to pus their agenda. And folks, this is painfully obvious as we are being controlled through very weak legislation and low levels of the government.
We have found a new piece of Federal legislation that is going to knock your socks off - and this may be the KEY to what is holding them back (along with the Canadian Bill of Rights) from creating a national vaxx policy.
It's an obscure piece of legislation called the Statutory Instruments Act, and ya, it's an odd name, but it's a pretty cool Act! And one that we LOVE dearly. And why do we love it so much? Because, freedom lovers, this Act is going to make it almost an impossible task for the Feds to override our rights through Federal legislation.
The purpose of this Act, among other things, is to examine how each piece of Federal legislation is implemented... and the clincher folks... to ENSURE IT DOES NOT TRESPASS ON OUR RIGHTS UNDER THE WONDERFUL CANADIAN BILL OF RIGHTS.
Despite how things appear, the government does not have a great command over Canada. This is evident as they are implementing policies through provincial and municipal orders, and as we know these cannot trump Federal legislation. There is case law that states Provincial orders cannot override our fundamental rights. It's all a game, one made of smoke and mirrors.
Here is the excerpt from the Act with the provision that preserves our rights under the Bill:
Examination
(2) On receipt by the Clerk of the Privy Council of copies of a proposed regulation pursuant to subsection (1), the Clerk of the Privy Council, in consultation with the Deputy Minister of Justice, shall examine the proposed regulation to ensure that:
-
(a) it is authorized by the statute pursuant to which it is to be made;
-
(b) it does not constitute an unusual or unexpected use of the authority pursuant to which it is to be made;
-
(c) it does not trespass unduly on existing rights and freedoms and is not, in any case, inconsistent with the purposes and provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Canadian Bill of Rights; and
-
(d) the form and draftsmanship of the proposed regulation are in accordance with established standards.
We must continue to push on in this battle. Know that the cards have been dealt in our favour. We MUST learn our rights and how to asset them. This is something we have never had to do before, but together, we can do this!
It starts with saying no, and it closes with HERE'S WHY. And this Act is one of the reason why.
#WEGOTTHIS
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/s-22/
(reposting for a friend - C5)
This is so heart warming. I hope something like this exists in Australia as well (and other parts of the world). I can feel that we are fast approaching the precipice and while its going to be scary what comes next, we have to trust that we will land on our feet and we will be free.
WWG1WGA
Start building communities, find your tribes. Gawd knows we’re watching the Aussies right now. I’m fucking rooting for you cunts! Y’all are way smarter, there’s no doubt some of the toughest people I know will find a way to fight back. With or without guns. WWG1WGA! Lead the way frens
FreeCanada.win, baby!
see comment under OP
Hopefully both 🇨🇦 and 🇦🇺 can change laws enough to arm its people
There is a reason why we have The Shooters Fishers and Farmers Party. Many, many Aussies own guns but you must not have a criminal record.
https://youtu.be/HvdnSOH2fWo
Ned Kelly has entered the chat.
Yep. Sad, really sad. Never, ever give up your guns. We have rotten politicians that have sold us out to China including those that have been responsible for sicing their police onto innocent protesters and beating them, including the elderly, to a pulp, breaking bones, smashing heads into pavements, using truncheons, using rubber bullets the size of an egg, with people losing eyes, teeth, and being jailed and fined just for not wearing a mask or outside getting some fresh air. They disgust me. I have lost all respect for the police. Unfortunately many of them responsible are the very ones that are the indoctrinated millennials that have gone thru our education system, never knew what war was ( husband just missed the Vietnam draft) as it ended not long after. I’m not disregarding the wars in the ME, but even those were watered down by the leftist media to not offend those watching it from their lounge chairs. But we lived it everyday where committed journalists didn’t hide the cruelty and truths of another globalist money making scheme, by sending our youth to be used as fodder to fatten their lust for blood and greed to replenish their bank balances via the war machine. God has blessed our two nations but it has only taken a couple of rotten apples to bring both countries to its knees. I hope it’s turned around soon because I don’t think I can bear the thought of my beautiful Granddaughters never knowing freedom like her Grandparents and Parents have had. Our youngest has spent 2 years of her life in lockdown; something she will never get back. Babies born just 2 years ago have never known freedom in Australia. Just think about that Aussies.
We can, there is a mechanism in which the government can hold a referendum on an issue, the whole nation can vote on it.
I can only remember 2 in recent memory (might be more), the last one was on gay marriage, the one before was a referendum on turning Australia into a Republic.
If Australia goes the Republic route we will have a chance to draw up the laws that govern the republic. As it is our current form of government is 'constitutional monarchy' and it's apparent that it sucks.
Sorry M, but wrong
a) the Marriage thing was a plebiscite, NOT a referendum
b) Government laws have been illegal and false since the Fed government altered the Constitution in the mid-70's WITHOUT going to referendum, which is required by the 1901 Constitution
i.e. They changed Queen of England etc into "Queen of Australia" which is a legal fiction.
c) Under the legal and correct constitution (1901) Australians are protected and our rights are protected as per common law. Common law is the law of the land for the past 2000+ years. It's clear, its solid, its based on natural law and the law of God, and it is what was codified in the US constitution.
We do NOT want to go a republic under their maritime law system, because it would strip us of our lawful freedoms and rights, just like the Roman republic did.
Common law is natural law, maritime aka statue law is civil law, aka roman city law.
Who championed the republic of Australia movement? Goldman Sachs Scion Turnbull. Why? Because this takes us one step further away from the foundation of our protections under the original constitution.
FYI, I used to think exactly the same way you do. USA = republic. AUS = const. monarchy. Therefore, republic good, const monarchy bad.
But its not true. Our rights and freedoms are protected under the original constitution which is actually rooted in the const. monarchy of the UK.
So, what do we do?
One, the original sovereignty of this land actually still belongs to the original owners of the land under common law - aka the Indigenous. They are the true common law sovereigns, as as men or women born in this land, we are also natural heirs to that sovereignty. Problem is, the government of Australia, usurped that sovereignty over the course of the 1900's and mad themselves the sovereigns over "australia".
Two, we must restore the correct and original order of creation, where creator has authority over created. God created men and women (and therefore has authority over us), men and women created government, government created corporations and "legal persons" which are lifeless, non-natural entities.
These principles of common law, which emerged and manifested via the British common law system (that all "lawful" laws come from and are rooted in natural law aka God's law), are the BASIS of the US constitution.
So, Three, in the future, once we restore the correct order where the People are the sovereigns, NOT the government, THEN we can institute a new constitution that finally puts in clear black and white that sovereignty lies with the People and that government MUST NOT EVER violate or usurp that sovereignty.
The laws of government were ONLY ever meant to control and manage government, NOT the people. Because the created has NO real authority over the creator.
Under natural (common) law, if I hurt you, you can seek damages, or you can forgive, its up to you. Under state law (legislation) now a crime becomes a crime against the Government (the State) and they will screw you whatever the case.
OK, getting a tad off topic here, but believe me, this is the real key to understanding how the fricken heck the Cabal got so much power, and why in Australia, our governments have all turned out to be psychopaths.
Worth checking out.
e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_PLp8BKB5E
Oh awesome! Can't tell you how grateful I am for your effort, as you could probably tell I was a bit iffy about the details of referendums and the like.
So glad you posted!
Despite the neighborly bbanter and heavy shilling, American patriots are watching and rooting and praying for you!
Chewing fingernails
WWG1WGA, fren. Fret not. Despite the often mean bantz, and obvious shilling, we would will stand with our northern neighbors. I love Canada, and we are winning, we will win and will would love to welcome your western provinces once we do :)
It sounds similar to how the Constitution here in the U.S. is the supreme law of the land and any law that doesn't follow the Constitution is null and void.
It seems to be a similar reason why they haven't been able to actually do mandates yet. As soon as they do, they would be sued into oblivion. Instead, they rely on intimidation, trickery and coercion to make people obey.
God bless the USA and Canada Fren. WWG1WGA.
Key to the Key
I don't want to be a party pooper, but I immediately focused in on the word 'unduly' in 2c. Any judge ruling on this will focus on the same word. It is problematic in the same way the notwithstanding clause is in the Charter. A judge could easily rule the pandemic rules and implementation of policy does not UNDULY trespass those rights, since big daddy government knows what's best for the kids....
I hope I'm wrong.
Plus there is this to contend with as well. The Quarantine Act: https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/Q-1.1/page-1.html
Evidence of the “Pandemic” must be proven by the government to have it hold up in court. It has already been demonstrated that no “evidence” is available.
I agree, unfortunately.
This is exactly the same situation in Aus, as far as I understand.
This is why Morrison is like "nah, nah, no mandates! No mandatory injections!" while at the same time doing everything he can to block the information from the ad-hoc (unconstitutional) "national cabinet" coming out, the national cabinet where the Feds and the States colluded together to implement the C19 mandates via the states.
Problem is, we have plenty of corruption in the courts. Our whole system stinks. But, the rights and etc guaranteed by federal law cannot be over-ridden by state law. When its Federation Vs States, the Fed law always takes priority.
At least, that is what I have read and understood.
The problem is, States are using coercion, smoke and mirrors, just like in Canada, to instigate F E A R and use this to get the people to buckle under and give in.
The Federal Gov. (Morrison) is getting the states to do his dirty work. The states are putting it back on individual companies ………….if you want funding,nudge, nudge, then do as I say.
Really good post. I may read this on my next broadcast. Thank u fren
Governments will always try to overreach. They must be constantly "beat down". Unfortunately they haven't been lately.
I love your comment and explanation of smoke and mirrors as it is exactly what they’re doing in USA with Biden hinting but no official ruling and states and employers rushing to implement.
Oh, cummahn boys, let's pitter patter. Hey broski, toss me a puppers whale yet at it, aye?
There’s a Pastor of yours named Arturo (forgot his last name) who has been jailed, persecuted, someone had his house burned down, and they tried to padlock his church because he refused to shut down services. Someone NEEDS to get this information to him. He needs help. He spoke on Flashpoint on Victory Channel.
Great info to have but I wonder if this, The Quarantine Act https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/Q-1.1/page-1.html overrides this. This act appears to give them quite a bit of authority. It seems to be directed at travellers but when have we ever known authority to not overstep their authority. Either way we need an end to this shit..
I'm not understanding how this can help. Can someone explain further?
Can unvaccinated Canadians enter the USA through the land border?
No, but that's because of American policy, not Canadian. If Biden were as loose with the Canadian border as he is with the Mexican, I'd be down there with my family in a heartbeat.
Canada can't stop normal citizens from leaving, but they can prevent people from entering. By "normal" I mean non-criminals without warrants and such.