It is fascism and it needs to be called out more often. Sadly the handful of French people I know through work are normies, they talk about the upcoming French Presidential election like it’s politics as usual.
But I refuse to believe France is lost, there is still a resistance, there still is hope. And something tells me France holds a key to bringing down the cabal, don’t know why, just a gut feel. Still it is sad to see the police going along with what they are be ordered to do, someday they will regret they allowed themselves to engage in immoral behavior.
It's not fascism. Don't use that term, because it will confuse the issue. It is globalist communism. The New World Order. Use those terms!! Rule by Satan is good, too.
Respectfully disagree, they don’t mind being called globalist or communist. There are a lot of brainwashed normies who think both are good things. But almost everyone recoils at the term Nazi or fascist.
The reality is globalism is a form of fascism. Q also makes it clear these people are connected to the Nazis; therefore, fascism in post 936 and several other posts.
It's global communism its fascism it's the masons it's the illuminati, it's the Jesuits it's crony capitalism it's Satanism it's Gnosticism it's it's it's.
It's Supremacist Judaism and oppression of the goyim and it always has been.
That explains 9/11, Iraq war, US congress, asymmetric hate speech laws, etc. Not so much the Iran deal, and Israel's vaccination rates (unless they come out less damaged somehow).
"The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open.
The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal.
The dictionary definition of fascism is: “a governmental system with strong centralized power, permitting no opposition or criticism, controlling all affairs of the nation (industrial, commercial, etc.), emphasizing an aggressive nationalism . . .” [The American College Dictionary,
New York: Random House, 1957.]
Under fascism, citizens retain the responsibilities of owning property, without freedom to act and without any of the advantages of ownership. Under socialism, government officials acquire all the advantages of ownership, without any of the responsibilities, since they do not hold title to the property, but merely the right to use it—at least until the next purge. In either case, the government officials hold the economic, political and legal power of life or death over the citizens.
Needless to say, under either system, the inequalities of income and standard of living are greater than anything possible under a free economy—and a man’s position is determined, not by his productive ability and achievement, but by political pull and force.
Under both systems, sacrifice is invoked as a magic, omnipotent solution in any crisis—and “the public good” is the altar on which victims are immolated. But there are stylistic differences of emphasis. The socialist-communist axis keeps promising to achieve abundance, material comfort and security for its victims, in some indeterminate future. The fascist-Nazi axis scorns material comfort and security, and keeps extolling some undefined sort of spiritual duty, service and conquest. The socialist-communist axis offers its victims an alleged social ideal. The fascist-Nazi axis offers nothing but loose talk about some unspecified form of racial or national “greatness.” The socialist-communist axis proclaims some grandiose economic plan, which keeps receding year by year. The fascist-Nazi axis merely extols leadership—leadership without purpose, program or direction—and power for power’s sake."
It is fascism and it needs to be called out more often. Sadly the handful of French people I know through work are normies, they talk about the upcoming French Presidential election like it’s politics as usual.
But I refuse to believe France is lost, there is still a resistance, there still is hope. And something tells me France holds a key to bringing down the cabal, don’t know why, just a gut feel. Still it is sad to see the police going along with what they are be ordered to do, someday they will regret they allowed themselves to engage in immoral behavior.
It's not fascism. Don't use that term, because it will confuse the issue. It is globalist communism. The New World Order. Use those terms!! Rule by Satan is good, too.
Respectfully disagree, they don’t mind being called globalist or communist. There are a lot of brainwashed normies who think both are good things. But almost everyone recoils at the term Nazi or fascist.
The reality is globalism is a form of fascism. Q also makes it clear these people are connected to the Nazis; therefore, fascism in post 936 and several other posts.
https://qposts.online/?q=936&s=postnum
Nazis are not fascists. Nazis are Nazis. National socialists.
It is fascism. It is not communism at all. Corporatism + government = Fascism. That is the very definition.
It's global communism its fascism it's the masons it's the illuminati, it's the Jesuits it's crony capitalism it's Satanism it's Gnosticism it's it's it's.
It's Supremacist Judaism and oppression of the goyim and it always has been.
That explains 9/11, Iraq war, US congress, asymmetric hate speech laws, etc. Not so much the Iran deal, and Israel's vaccination rates (unless they come out less damaged somehow).
Easy there, goyim!
Fascism requires nationalism, the antithesis of globohomo.
Its not communism, its a technocracy
It’s not a bird it’s not a plane it’s super man
"The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open.
The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal.
The dictionary definition of fascism is: “a governmental system with strong centralized power, permitting no opposition or criticism, controlling all affairs of the nation (industrial, commercial, etc.), emphasizing an aggressive nationalism . . .” [The American College Dictionary, New York: Random House, 1957.]
Under fascism, citizens retain the responsibilities of owning property, without freedom to act and without any of the advantages of ownership. Under socialism, government officials acquire all the advantages of ownership, without any of the responsibilities, since they do not hold title to the property, but merely the right to use it—at least until the next purge. In either case, the government officials hold the economic, political and legal power of life or death over the citizens.
Needless to say, under either system, the inequalities of income and standard of living are greater than anything possible under a free economy—and a man’s position is determined, not by his productive ability and achievement, but by political pull and force.
Under both systems, sacrifice is invoked as a magic, omnipotent solution in any crisis—and “the public good” is the altar on which victims are immolated. But there are stylistic differences of emphasis. The socialist-communist axis keeps promising to achieve abundance, material comfort and security for its victims, in some indeterminate future. The fascist-Nazi axis scorns material comfort and security, and keeps extolling some undefined sort of spiritual duty, service and conquest. The socialist-communist axis offers its victims an alleged social ideal. The fascist-Nazi axis offers nothing but loose talk about some unspecified form of racial or national “greatness.” The socialist-communist axis proclaims some grandiose economic plan, which keeps receding year by year. The fascist-Nazi axis merely extols leadership—leadership without purpose, program or direction—and power for power’s sake."
http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/fascism-nazism.html
So given all that, I'd say fascism is correct now but headed towards communism ("you will own nothing and be happy").
Meh, it's at best both. But it's at least fascism.
Tyranny is always sufficient.
If it were fascism, you wouldn't be fined for using the countries flag.
This is international tyranny.
Whether come in as Fascist, Socialists, Communists, etc. let's call them all for what they are, TYRANTS!
/sic semper tyrannis
Analyze it all you want, but bottom line—and throughout history—it’s ALWAYS the Elites against the Pedes!
Truth!
The police follow orders. Doesn't matter if they're told to beat the shit out of a child or elderly person, they'll do it.