This isn't Islam vs Judaism, Conservative vs Liberal or even Republican vs Democrat. It's GOOD vs Evil.
(media.greatawakening.win)
- N C S W I C -
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Whoever wrote the Protocols is not human, they are predators. It's basically a giant tome of hate porn.
People who worship space aliens and were dumb enough to keep sacrificing their firstborns to them.
Protocols is fake and ghey.
US Military Intelligence disagrees.
The Protocols of Zion Confirmed To Be Genuine From Declassified 1919 US Military Intelligence Documents.
"The Power and Aims of International Jewry" War Department Investigation Report of 1919.
https://christiansfortruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/1919-US-War-Dept-Investigation-Substantiates-Protocols-of-Zion-.pdf
Almost everything in the Protocols, much as I hate to say it, is factual. I am not just talking about the blueprint which obviously the Zionists have been using against us in every minute detail - but the observations about human nature and how they tend to be sheep and turn towards sweet words of equality and turn against those who actually try to help them.
This is the part that keeps me up at night:
It makes sense that as long as human nature is sheep-like for the most part, the fact remains that absolute freedom can always be abused by someone to foment the whole enslavement once again.
Is it really the truth that social existence requires division of labour and division of men into classes? Does this change after Great Awakening? Will the consciousness level of all the people get elevated to the point where no one is sheep any more and we can all use our freedoms responsibly even beyond current generations?
OR, is it true that even after Great Awakening, we will still require true monarchy - someone who understands the divine plan and enforces it strictly to keep the society from veering back into the enslavement based on liberalism?
Will democracy or constitutional republic ever work foolproof, even when its just people who are responsible to safeguarding it? Or do we need a higher power (divine power) to constantly keep it safe?
I believe this is something Anons need to discuss a lot.
Bullshit.
Protocols was written in a couple of versions between 1905 and 1917 by Sergei Nilus, a Czarist in Moscow, who exploited existing anti-Jewish feelings to blame Bolshevism on the Jews.
Conclusively exposed in 1921 by Philip Graves of the Times of London as a blatant plagiarism of Maurice Joly's "Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu ou la politique de Machiavel au XIXe siècle" written 1864. This latter was a political satire written in protest against the regime of Napoleon III (a.k.a. Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte), who ruled France from 1848 to 1870 and which actually does not invove any Jewish characters.
See: The truth about "The Protocols": a literary forgery https://archive.org/details/truthaboutthepro00londiala
See: The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dialogue_in_Hell_Between_Machiavelli_and_Montesquieu
See also: Proven false 100 years ago, antisemitic ‘Protocols’ document is still being exploited https://www.arabnews.com/node/1906891/middle-east
False.
https://www.henrymakow.com/maurice_joly_plagiarized_proto.html
Reading Kerry Bolton's monograph "The Protocols of Zion In Context" (Renaissance Press, 2003) it became obvious that Joly was plagiarizing from The Protocols and not vice-versa.
Joly, a Jew whose real name was Joseph Levy, was a lifelong Mason and member of the "Lodge of Mizraim" where the Protocols document originated. He was the protege of Adolph Cremieux (Isaac Moise Cremieux 1796-1880) the head of the lodge, founder of the Alliance Israalite Universelle and a Minister in the Jewish-backed government of Leon Gambetta.
The plot is described in the Protocols as "centuries-old." It most likely predates "Dialogue." Joly was well versed in the Protocols and borrowed from it to flesh out the unpopular authoritarian position of Machiavelli, which he ascribed to Napoleon III.
Joly, who committed suicide in 1879, was in the habit of "borrowing." He is accused of plagiarizing a popular novel by Eugene Sue, namely "Les Mystares du Paris." (1845) Also, his work is predated by another of Cremieux's proteges, Jacob Venedy, entitled, "Machiavelli, Montesquieu, Rousseau." (1850)
In 1884 Mme. Justine Glinka, the daughter of a Russian General living in Paris, hired Joseph Schorst, a member of Joly's Mizraim Lodge to obtain sensitive information. For the sum of 2500 francs, Schorst provided Glinka with "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion." He was subsequently tracked down and murdered in Egypt.
I agree with u/Mountaingale that it is a giant tome of hate port, BUT, we cant read it and compare for ourselves what is happening to us. Its exactly the same blue print.
So regardless of who wrote it or where it came from, someone is using it as a blueprint and it is imperative that every Anon reads it fully so they under the minute details and know what to expect.