12
InarosPrime 12 points ago +12 / -0

Add 2 eggs to a frying pan and eat them when cooked as desired. Throw the rest of it in the compost so you can grow more chicken feed.

Fixed step 4 for you. Step 5 is not needed anymore.

3
InarosPrime 3 points ago +3 / -0

If he were to announce his intention to become Speaker, the lame duck Democrats would only need a simple majority to change the rules so only members of the House can become Speaker. With the RINOs we have, it is unlikely they would reverse such a rule after forming the new House.

1
InarosPrime 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was thinking of the federal bill that passed the Senate back in March. Apparently, it hasn't been signed into law yet, even though it would have easily passed a vote in the House. For a second, I forgot we have a useless federal government that won't pass bills unless it includes billions for Ukraine.

1
InarosPrime 1 point ago +2 / -1

How will this work next year? We are staying on DST permanently, so 11:11 will be an hour too late.

4
InarosPrime 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Stanford prison experiment was in 1971. That was half of a century ago.

2
InarosPrime 2 points ago +2 / -0

She also posed in front of the capitol with a triangle hand gesture. I wouldn't vote for Trump if she was on his ticket.

4
InarosPrime 4 points ago +4 / -0

October is usually a month for major political news that often impacts the upcoming election. My prediction is they arrest Trump on October 8th to try turning the public against him. In the eyes of the public, many will see him as guilty until proven innocent.

2
InarosPrime 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dietary cholesterol does not affect blood cholesterol in most people. Just ignore the nutrient label if it says "cholesterol" unless you have a rare condition.

1
InarosPrime 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everything I have been reading about SHTF says it will likely start between December and June. Between Europe's drought, Ukraine's limited farming this year, and fertilizer shortages in the US, starvation is something the civilized world might experience again. In addition, banks are preparing for a catastrophe predicted to happen as early as December.

3
InarosPrime 3 points ago +4 / -1

What do you think about the physical evidence supporting events described in The Bible? Archeological discoveries have found things like King Solomon's Wall, evidence of a great flood 7,000 years ago, writings in non-Christian sources verifying the existence of Jesus, the Dead Sea Scrolls supporting events of the Old Testament, and various other findings.

1
InarosPrime 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you consider the limitations of language, it is possible for Revelations to be both literal and figurative at the same time. There were no words to describe modern (or even unknown futuristic things) seen by the author. I would assume they would make their best possible descriptions using the words they had, while also lacking knowledge of what they observed.

4
InarosPrime 4 points ago +4 / -0

Option C if you're a leftist: Make the white kids sit on the floor. The minorities can use the chairs.

4
InarosPrime 4 points ago +4 / -0

Even if it appeared natural, people on this very discussion board would claim it wasn't natural.

29
InarosPrime 29 points ago +29 / -0

Everything about the "vaccine" was setting off red flags.

People were passing out on camera within seconds and the talking heads told us to ignore our eyes.
There were rumors of deaths within days following the shot and the talking heads said it was safe.
Those who questioned the need for a vaccine for such a low risk virus were told by the talking heads it was the only way to save the world.
The talking heads ridiculed anyone who pointed out the possibility of proven alternative treatments, like IVM.
The lack of accountability and insulation from liability should have been the biggest red flag. Eventually, the talking heads told us it was approved by the FDA, even though only Comirnaty was.

The signs were there for anyone to see this "vaccine" was not to be trusted.

2
InarosPrime 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't see where the meme explicitly offers the choice of 'whether or not to take the shot'.

That is what I am saying is wrong with the (not a meme) text presented. The real choice people face is to take the shot or not. In making that decision, they need to know the odds of both acquiring and dying myocarditis, versus the odds of dying from what they are told the "vaccine" protects them from.

The faulty comparison is made worse by the fact that the odds of getting COVID in one's lifetime are nearly 100% at this point. Myocarditis is a rare side-effect, from what we have seen so far. Comparing myocarditis induced by the "vaccine" to COVID death is the same as assuming myocarditis is inevitable.

I want to be clear that I don't believe the "vaccine" provides any protection. The choice people make is often based on misinformation and propaganda fed to them by the media and government.

3
InarosPrime 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is a logical fallacy. The choice presented is not "get myocarditis or get COVID". The choice is whether or not to take the COVID shot. The way it is presented is a faulty comparison fallacy.

5
InarosPrime 5 points ago +5 / -0

The latest dataset from the ONS is titled ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status, England, 1 January 2021 to 31 May 2022‘, and it can be accessed on the ONS site here, and downloaded here.

It has a link to the place where you can find the data set, and a direct link to download the data set from the same site in case you can't find it easily. The source is the UK government, as the article's headline states. There is nothing "unconfirmed" about this.

3
InarosPrime 3 points ago +3 / -0

I prefer the term, hyperbullshitia. It refers to the condition in which one believes the bullshit spewing from one's mouth for so long they are intoxicated by it.

1
InarosPrime 1 point ago +1 / -0

Again, you lashed out at someone who only tried to answer your question. That isn't very Christian-like.

You obviously have some issue and you're taking it out on some random person on the internet. Please talk to someone about it so you feel better. Find someone who will give you a hug, too.

I hope you feel better. Have a nice Fourth of July weekend!

0
InarosPrime 0 points ago +1 / -1

What is your problem? Everyone else who read the comment above understood it was speculation based on common sense and an understanding of the enemy. You insult someone who tried to answer your question instead of accepting that answer. If anyone needs to get off this site, it is you.

view more: Next ›