Full tweet:
The @GOP doesn’t lose in today’s removal of McCarthy (in fact good riddance).
The AMERICAN people WIN!
The Republican Party must come to grips with the strong sentiment of the American people, especially the conservative base…that sentiment is one of patriotism and a very strong desire to save our country from the death grip of these communist Marxists led by the likes of @BarackObama (isn’t that right skippy?)…or should I say skippette?
Yes, we win. And we WIN big time!!!
A giant spotlight is now put on the corruption and “criminalization of government service” by the bought and paid for politicians that are now put on notice by the American people to do your damn jobs.
ENOUGH is ENOUGH.
These historic times call for historic action and the American people have been demanding smart, measured action and I want to again thank @RepMattGaetz for his decision to be courageous.
Courage is a decision and you made a heroic decision. The American people appreciate you.
So Trump backed McCarthy. Many if not most of us think it was to expose him - and he has been, enough he got fired (!). So mission ONE accomplished. What is mission TWO? Another RINO and Moar Exposure just doesn't seem like it....
“I never thought I’d live to see the day when the right wing would become the cool ones giving the middle finger to the establishment, and the left wing becoming the sniveling self-righteous twatty ones going around shaming everyone."
-- John Lydon (aka Johnny Rotten)
I think VDH is right about a lot of things but he seems to be primarily a historian who is only aware of the Official Version of history - and so with politics, basically he looks at the surface/official version and isn't aware of the rest. Book-smart not forums-blogs-etc-smart. I expect he's not really aware of/following any anon accounts on X or TS for instance.
Yeah this came up in another thread recently, either Q is full of shit (or maybe this is "necessary" disinfo - see "unless" below) or this absolutely says the timeline.
This does not read like a "very well could be disinfo for the other side" post - unless things happen sooner of course LOL.
They did this on purpose. Social media destroyed what was left of anyone's attention span.
Also, and this just occurred to me to think about, it used to be that something like this being in the news and staying in the news was where the news actually benefited/made money. And of course controversy would fuel it. Of course we know the news shifted to not trying to make money but to simply be propaganda (surely state-funded), but also it shifted from a model that actually held people's attention (ironically enough here) to one that absolutely doesn't. Keep moving, don't let anything sink in, maximum distraction.
Answer the question, Claire.