PfizerSoze 3 points ago +3 / -0


Most Protestants claim that Mary bore children other than Jesus. To support their claim, these Protestants refer to the biblical passages which mention the “brethren of the Lord”. As explained in the earlier post, neither the Gospel accounts nor the early Christians (The church fathers) attest to the notion that Mary bore other children besides Jesus. The faithful knew, through the witness of Scripture and Tradition, that Jesus was Mary’s only child and that she remained a lifelong virgin.

An important historical document which supports the teaching of Mary’s perpetual virginity is the Protoevangelium of James, which was written probably less than sixty years after the conclusion of Mary’s earthly life (around A.D. 120), when memories of her life were still vivid in the minds of many.

see also:


According to the world-renowned patristics scholar, Johannes Quasten:

“The principal aim of the whole writing [Protoevangelium of James] is to prove the perpetual and inviolate virginity of Mary before, in, and after the birth of Christ”. (Patrology, 1:120–1).

To begin with, the Protoevangelium records that when Mary’s birth was prophesied, her mother, St. Anne, vowed that she would devote the child to the service of the Lord, as Samuel had been by his mother (1 Sam. 1:11). Mary would thus serve the Lord at the Temple, as women had for centuries (1 Sam. 2:22), and as Anna the prophetess did at the time of Jesus’ birth (Luke 2:36–37). A life of continual, devoted service to the Lord at the Temple meant that Mary would not be able to live the ordinary life of a child-rearing mother. Rather, she was vowed to a life of perpetual virginity.

However, due to considerations of ceremonial cleanliness, it was eventually necessary for Mary, a consecrated “virgin of the Lord,” to have a guardian or protector who would respect her vow of virginity. Thus, according to the Protoevangelium, Joseph, an elderly widower who already had children, was chosen to be her spouse. (This would also explain why Joseph was apparently dead by the time of Jesus’ adult ministry, since he does not appear during it in the gospels, and since Mary is entrusted to John, rather than to her husband Joseph, at the crucifixion).

According to the Protoevangelium, Joseph was required to regard Mary’s vow of virginity with the utmost respect. The gravity of his responsibility as the guardian of a virgin was indicated by the fact that, when she was discovered to be with child, he had to answer to the Temple authorities, who thought him guilty of defiling a virgin of the Lord. Mary was also accused of having forsaken the Lord by breaking her vow. Keeping this in mind, it is an incredible insult to the Blessed Virgin to say that she broke her vow by bearing children other than her Lord and God, who was conceived through the power of the Holy Spirit.

The perpetual virginity of Mary has always been reconciled with the biblical references to Christ’s brethren through a proper understanding of the meaning of the term “brethren”. The understanding that the brethren of the Lord were Jesus’ stepbrothers (children of Joseph) rather than half-brothers (children of Mary) was the most common one until the time of Jerome (fourth century). It was Jerome who introduced the possibility that Christ’s brethren were actually his cousins, since in Jewish idiom cousins were also referred to as “brethren”. The Catholic Church allows the faithful to hold either view, since both are compatible with the reality of Mary’s perpetual virginity.

Today most Protestants are unaware of these early beliefs regarding Mary’s virginity and the proper interpretation of “the brethren of the Lord”. And yet, the Protestant Reformers themselves—Martin Luther, John Calvin, and Ulrich Zwingli—honored the perpetual virginity of Mary and recognized it as the teaching of the Bible, as have other, more modern Protestants.


PfizerSoze 4 points ago +4 / -0

You are truly a deluded person to accuse me of denying Jesus Christ as the only form of salvation. I expect as much from a person who has been brought up on jack chick style propaganda and protestant cherrypicking of holy scripture.

The Queen of Heaven

Several times I have encountered protestants accusing me of having Mary as a pagan goddess simply because the Virgin Mary is sometimes referred to as the "Queen of heaven." They would quote Jeremiah typically where a pagan goddess is referred to as the Queen of Heaven. The children gather wood, the fathers light the fire, and the women knead the dough and make cakes of bread for the Queen of Heaven. They pour out drink offerings to other gods to provoke me to anger.--Jeremiah 7:18 (NIV) In addition the term Queen of Heaven is mentioned in Jeremiah 44 where its mentioned people would "burn incense and pour out drink offerings to her".

However, the Virgin Mary is not a goddess to us, she is, however, the holiest woman ever made by God, but is not omnipotent. Catholic women do not make "cakes of bread for the Queen of Heaven" as the pagans did for Asherah. Nor do we pour out drink offerings and burn incense offerings to her as the pagans did for Asherah.

In fact when there was a sect in the early Church called the Collyridians in Arabia that did offer to Mary "cakes of bread"-- they were condemned: "For certain women decorate a barber's chair or a square seat, spread a cloth on it, set out bread and offer it in Mary's name on a certain day of the year"-St Epiphanius of Salamis, The Panarion [The Medicine Chest against Heresies] (AD 377) He calls their practices "silly", "ridiculous," "extreme," and "idolatrous". This group may be the reason the Quran speaks of Mary as if Christians included her in the trinity.

The reason Catholics do call Mary Queen of Heaven is because of her Son, Christ, who is the King of Heaven, and in the Old Testament Scriptures the mother of the King was given a throne and was Queen (perhaps since kings had many wives in those days and would cause there to be many queens): So Bathsheba went to King Solomon to speak to him for Adonijah. And the king arose to meet her, bowed before her, and sat on his throne; then he had a throne set for the king's mother, and she sat on his right.-1 Kings 2:19 NASB

Say to the king and the queen mother, "Take a lowly seat, For your beautiful crown Has come down from your head."--Jeremiah 13:18 NASB Notice that Revelation 12 can be interpreted as Mary, since she did give birth to the male Child, Jesus: A great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars;--Revelation 12:1 NASB Certainly we do not call Mary Queen of Heaven for no reason at all! (It is also interesting why Protestants do not wish to call her a queen in any sense if all saints in Heaven are given crowns and are called "kings" or "queen" in Revelation)

Though the term Queen of Heaven is given to a pagan goddess in the Old Testament, does not mean the term must be excluded to Mary? Let's consider some biblical titles given to people:

Who is the "King of kings?" Christ?, or a worldly pagan king?

Most assume only Christ can be called "king of kings" as seen here: which God will bring about in his own time—God, the blessed and only Ruler, the King of kings and Lord of lords,--1 Timothy 6:15

They will make war against the Lamb, but the Lamb will overcome them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings—and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers."--Revelation 17:14

On his robe and on his thigh he has this name written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.--Revelation 19:16 HOWEVER, here we see it being applied to earthly rulers of the Old Testament: Artaxerxes, king of kings, To Ezra the priest, a teacher of the Law of the God of heaven: Greetings.--Ezra 7:12

"For this is what the Sovereign LORD says: From the north I am going to bring against Tyre Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, king of kings, with horses and chariots, with horsemen and a great army.--Ezekiel 26:7

You, O king, are the king of kings. The God of heaven has given you dominion and power and might and glory;-Daniel 2:37 Hence, following the logic of Protestants making the assertion the Catholic Mary is a pagan goddess just because she is called Queen of Heaven, then THEY would have to conclude THEY worship pagan kings because they call God "King of kings" or they would have to deny the Divine Inspiration of St Paul in 1 Timothy and St John in Revelation. Both of these points are ridiculous since just because two people are called the same thing does not require them to be the same person.

Let us continue with another, more controversial title found in the bible--Lucifer. Most assume Lucifer if the actual name of the Devil before he fell and became known as Satan, or the Devil. However, this is not the case as all, Lucifer is just a reference to the state of Satan prior to his fall, not his actual name. The name/word Lucifer is actually a good name, not to be associated with something sinister as a the devil, in fact in the early Church some Christians were actually named Lucifer. Most are surprised to know that Lucifer is not a Hebrew name, in fact is not even Greek or Aramaic--its Latin. The reason people associated the name Lucifer as Satan's proper name is because of the King James Version of the Bible, where in Isaiah 14:12 it reads: How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! This is proof of the KJV is influenced by the Latin Vulgate which read in Isaiah 14:12: quomodo cecidisti de caelo lucifer qui mane oriebaris corruisti in terram qui vulnerabas gentes The King James Version seems to present it as a his name, the original 1611 KJV puts in in the margins an alternative translation "day starre."It also should be noted the person called Lucifer here is not necessary the devil, but a king being addressed.

Strong's Lexicon for the word translated in the KJV as lucifer states its definition as the following: From 1984 (in the sense of brightness); the morning star: - lucifer.--H1966 The word Lucifer is Latin means "light-bringing" and "The morning-star, the planet Venus". The reason the word "lucifer" or "day star" or "morning star" is brought up is because these terms are given to the Lord Himself.

The Latin Vulgate, the origin of the word "Lucifer" gave the same title to Christ in 2 Peter 1:19: et habemus firmiorem propheticum sermonem cui bene facitis adtendentes quasi lucernae lucenti in caliginoso loco donec dies inlucescat et lucifer oriatur in cordibus vestris

The English Translation being: And so, we have an even firmer prophetic word, to which you would do well to listen, as to a light shining within a dark place, until the day dawns, and the daystar [Lucifer] rises, in your hearts. Lucifer being translated day star. The King James Version of Isaiah 14:12 and 2 Peter 1:19 are: How art thou fallen from heaven, O day star, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!--Isaiah 14:12, KJV 1611 translation based on marginal note

We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts:--2 Peter 1:19. KJV 1611 Note the King James Bible applies the term "day star" to both a king/Devil (before his fall) and Christ.

Now more modern translations of the bible such as the NASB mention "morning star" in the following: "How you have fallen from heaven, O star of the morning, son of the dawn! You have been cut down to the earth, You who have weakened the nations!--Isaiah 14:12

So we have the prophetic word made more sure, to which you do well to pay attention as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star arises in your hearts.-2 Peter 1:19

And I will give him the morning star.--Revelation 2:28

I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.--Revelation 22:16 In summary, yes a pagan goddess is called Queen of Heaven in the Old Testament, but in the Old Testament pagan kings are also called "morning star"(Isaiah 14:12) and "king of kings"(Ezra 7:12, Ezekiel 26:7, Daniel 2:37), which are both terms applied to Christ in the New Testament.


PfizerSoze 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are Cherrypicking & thus leave out the whole written word. The whole scripture ties together in that St. John is writing of False prophets and men who lead others astray. these people are rightfully called liars by St. John... those that deny that Jesus is the Christ. The Christian Catholics began as the Apostles and the Believers in Jesus Christ, the Martyrs dying for the love of Jesus Christ.

24 Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son, and in the Father.

The Apostles and Believers in Jesus Christ have been Catholic Christians from the very first moment Jesus Established Them as the Church .These Catholics all heard from the beginning. That which these Catholics heard from the beginning remained in them. They shall continue in the Son, and in the Father.

What did these Christians hear? Jesus Christ, our Blessed and Beautiful Savior, establish His Church upon Peter and the Gates of Hell shall never prevail against it. If you actually studied History instead of making things up, you would understand the plethora of religions and beliefs of that time and worldwide that made up false prophecies and leading new Christians astray...just like today. False prophets and liars abound even here with cherrypicking scripture and making things up.

There were walkaways from Jesus Christ and were of the mind that only God must be worshipped and that Jesus was not the Son of God. If you are implying that the Christian Catholics were walkaways denying Jesus as Son of God, you are very much mistaken and very deeply entrenched in your mistake. Saul deep in mistakeness.

20 But ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know all things.

21 I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it, and that no lie is of the truth.

22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.

23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.

24 Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son, and in the Father.

25 And this is the promise that he hath promised us, even eternal life.

26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.

27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.

28 And now, little children, abide in him; that, when he shall appear, we may have confidence, and not be ashamed before him at his coming.

29 If ye know that he is righteous, ye know that every one that doeth righteousness is born of him.

PfizerSoze 3 points ago +3 / -0

Vehement protestants swarm these posts that are specifically discussing a Catholic subject (although there are some Lutheran sects that utilize the Rosary) seeking those without a firm Catholic faith, to either lull them or outright insult them into dropping their faith. Honestly, pretty lousy proselytizing on the protestants part.

How I led Catholics Out of the Church STEVE WOOD I was a Protestant for twenty years before I became a Catholic. I led many people out of the Catholic Church. My formula for getting Catholics to leave the Church usually consisted of three steps:


Catholic and Orthodox Christians strong in their Faith in Our Almighty God know the proselytizers well...some of them are acting in an innocent zeal without knowledge of what they attack such as Saul, a persecutor, later a Christ filled St. Paul. They are aping what they have learned in the protestant pulpits, and they will never care to learn which is a very, very protestant hallmark.

PfizerSoze 2 points ago +3 / -1


When Fundamentalists study the writings of the "Reformers" (or founders of their particular sect) on Mary, the Mother of Jesus, they will find that the "Reformers" accepted almost every major Marian doctrine and considered these doctrines to be both scriptural and fundamental to the historic Christian Faith.

PfizerSoze 3 points ago +3 / -0

also ask for any broken rosaries and parts if you enjoy jewelry making or repair work...they usually have a box of broken/rosary parts available. Some folks make chaplet sets from the parts.

PfizerSoze 7 points ago +7 / -0

Any St. Vincent de Paul thrift stores have them

PfizerSoze 14 points ago +14 / -0

Qresearch/8kun raw data dumps:

Tanzania : https://qresear.ch/?q=tanzania

Burundi: https://qresear.ch/?q=burundi

Haiti: https://qresear.ch/?q=haiti

Swaziland (eSwatini) https://qresear.ch/?q=swaziland https://qresear.ch/?q=eswatini

Ivory Coast : https://qresear.ch/?q=ivory+coast


Tanzania, Burundi :




eSwatini (formerly Swaziland) Prime minister died


eSwatini KING thanks Republic of China in Taiwan for saving him:


Ivory Coast ( Côte d’Ivoire) President alive, Prime minister set to succeed him dies. Didn't find any information on these leaders of Ivory Coast being opposed to vaccine,they were opposed to Astrazenica same as Haiti




Haiti President Jovenel Moïse assassinated



PfizerSoze 4 points ago +4 / -0

My biggest issue with the document right off the bat is the AMA titles the document "COVID-19 Guide" but then talks about the importance of "vaccines" in general as if all vaccines are on a continuum and are not discrete inoculations that live on their own. The COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are MUCH different than prior traditional vaccines. Can we at least acknowledge that conflating mRNA vaccines with vaccines that use attenuated virus or bacteria is wrong?


PfizerSoze 15 points ago +15 / -0


The American Medical Association (AMA) releases a stunning document teaching doctors to LIE to patients while deliberately exaggerating Covid death claims… the AMA admits to its own complicity in crimes against humanity. In the same document, on page 8, doctors are instructed on how to block, deflect and redirect questions to cover up the truth about vaccine injuries and deaths. They are specifically instructed to change the subject and reject questions from reporters or patients, while pushing AMA-approved “official” propaganda by claiming it’s all based on “facts,” not “science” or “medicine.” In essence the AMA is now attempting to transform doctors into propaganda puppets for the global depopulation agenda. Practicing real medicine is no longer the priority of the AMA, it seems. Rather, physicians must practice lying in order to remain an AMA member in good standing. Get the shocking full story (and the AMA’s document) plus podcast here.


PfizerSoze 43 points ago +43 / -0


24-Jul-2019 4:14:50 PM EDT




force of nature (plural forces of nature) A mighty natural force which is beyond human control, notably if potentially catastrophic, such as the elements (e.g. storms and extreme temperatures) or geological (e.g. seismic and volcanic) activity

PfizerSoze 2 points ago +2 / -0


F3 Platform Biologics Developing Cancer-Preventing Drugs …

[Search domain polsky.uchicago.edu] https://polsky.uchicago.edu/ › 2021 › 01 › 12 › f3-platform-biologics-developing-cancer-preventing-drugs-based-on-the-work-of-uchicago-researcher-david-grdina

F3 Platform Biologics is currently working with the Polsky Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation's Science and Technology team to expand Grdina's patents for other uses on a global scale. "We have invested more than $4.5 million into the technology to get us where we want to go," said Jonathan Rosen, CEO and chairman of the company …

Polsky Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation (https://polsky.uchicago.edu/)

Home - Polsky Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation


F3 Platform Biologics is developing a low dose of the FDA-approved drug Amifostine. The solution helps prevent radiation-induced genomic damage and instability, which is a potential side effect of exposure to ionizing radiation, such as the radiation present in CT scans. (Image: iStock.com/Rabizo)

Amifostine has a long history and today could potentially help prevent the development of approximately 40,000 cancer cases each year – the goal of F3 Platform Biologics.


PfizerSoze 6 points ago +6 / -0


We need more bravery like this

Quote Tweet

Melissa Tate


Dr. Peter McCullough breaks down in tears at the tragedy that is happening with doctors following the Govt.’s orders to not give early treatment to patients when early treatment has proven effective

PfizerSoze 4 points ago +4 / -0

Mike Pompeo


The Democrats are proposing a $3.5 trillion bridge to socialism.

9:43 AM · Oct 8, 2021·Twitter Web App


Q Drop #1015


Gateway Bridge Project.

$1.8mm Cory Booker - Singapore.

$3.5mm Chuck Schumer - Israel.

$400k Chris Christie - Mary Pat US.


Omnibus Bill.

The gift that keeps on giving.


PfizerSoze 2 points ago +2 / -0

My name is Dr. Kevin Stillwagon. I am a property owner and a taxpayer in Orange County. You are making some really bad decisions based on fear of a virus that has about a 99% survival rate for most of us. That is unsubstantiated fear.

So let me give you a couple of things to truly be fearful about. That mask that you keep insisting that people wear decreases the amount of oxygen in your lung tissue. We now know that this virus uses something called a Furin cleavage site to merge with your lung tissue to infect you, and it works better with decreased oxygen. And peer-reviewed research clearly shows that wearing a mask increases your chances of developing an upper respiratory infection 13 times more than a person not wearing a mask. So I would stop wearing a mask immediately if I were you. Secondly, this shot that you insist on people getting gives you absolutely no protection against infection. It is the innate immune system that protects you from infection by using dendritic cells, T cells, and natural killer cells without antibodies ever becoming involved.

This shot has one goal, and that goal is to make antibodies. These antibodies circulate inside of you and cannot prevent an infection. They can only react to something that has already gotten inside of you. They cannot keep something out. The shot decreases the ability of your innate immune system to keep viruses out by 60%. And a booster shot will reduce it even more. Even worse, the antibodies that are created by this shot can no longer neutralize variants and actually enhance the virus’s ability to infect you. It should be painfully obvious to you by now that fully vaccinated people are getting sick. And this will continue to get worse if you keep trying to jab people while a virus is trying to spread. The variants are emerging from the vaccinated population. This so-called vaccine is still being administered on what’s called an emergency use authorization. It is not FDA-approved. The FDA approved a biological licensing application for a product called Comirnaty. The application was approved, not the product. Comirnaty is not available in the United States. Therefore, by law, you cannot force people to take this drug without informed consent and without animal trials to prove that it is safe.

Mayor Demings, please look at me. You, sir, are in violation of the United States Constitution and the Nuremberg Code. You will be held accountable. Good day.” – Dr. Kevin Stillwagon

PfizerSoze 3 points ago +3 / -0

Uranium One Delivery


Wikileaks ~ mueller


POTUS Tweet 2018 + Q drops Mueller & angry Democrats


mueller, mattis pic


view more: Next ›