Why do they work so hard to denigrate the Q movement? Because we are over the target!
HUBRIS: A big part of why the deep state was/is so sloppy in their efforts to steal the election is due to hubris. They really didn't think they'd get caught. Remember how absolutely certain Hillary was that she would defeat GEOTUS? Yeah, there was a reason for that.
Taken from drop # 2947 (March 3, 2019):
Do we let the enemies walk through the front door?
If you're familiar at all with self-defense laws across the United States, one of the big determining factors is if the perp is shot during an actual attack. If they are fleeing and you shoot them in the back, you are much more likely to go to jail.
BUT if they have entered your home (eg through the front door), you are free to use force to protect yourself and your family. Also, it's pretty danged hard to say they were innocent when they've forced their way into your home.
Strategy! Those warriors who are fighting the good fight behind the scenes aren't just flailing about willy nilly. There is a logical plan and progression for what is being done. And sometimes we have to wait for the enemy to commit themselves to egregiously treasonous actions before we can take them out.
I am not a Q expert but I am a Q enthusiast. I do look at drops and interpretations of those drops with a healthy dose of skepticism. I think everyone should. I think Q encourages everyone to do their own research and draw their own conclusions based on the evidence. To ask questions. To dig deeper. That is perhaps the biggest reason I was drawn to the Q movement initially.
There is a huge effort to get people to stop thinking for themselves. And a huge effort to denigrate, undermine, and shame anyone who follows Q. Here is the big question: who would benefit from a population that follows blindly?
Excellent post!
Why do they work so hard to denigrate the Q movement? Because we are over the target!
HUBRIS: A big part of why the deep state was/is so sloppy in their efforts to steal the election is due to hubris. They really didn't think they'd get caught. Remember how absolutely certain Hillary was that she would defeat GEOTUS? Yeah, there was a reason for that.
Taken from drop # 2947 (March 3, 2019):
If you're familiar at all with self-defense laws across the United States, one of the big determining factors is if the perp is shot during an actual attack. If they are fleeing and you shoot them in the back, you are much more likely to go to jail.
BUT if they have entered your home (eg through the front door), you are free to use force to protect yourself and your family. Also, it's pretty danged hard to say they were innocent when they've forced their way into your home.
Strategy! Those warriors who are fighting the good fight behind the scenes aren't just flailing about willy nilly. There is a logical plan and progression for what is being done. And sometimes we have to wait for the enemy to commit themselves to egregiously treasonous actions before we can take them out.
I am not a Q expert but I am a Q enthusiast. I do look at drops and interpretations of those drops with a healthy dose of skepticism. I think everyone should. I think Q encourages everyone to do their own research and draw their own conclusions based on the evidence. To ask questions. To dig deeper. That is perhaps the biggest reason I was drawn to the Q movement initially.
There is a huge effort to get people to stop thinking for themselves. And a huge effort to denigrate, undermine, and shame anyone who follows Q. Here is the big question: who would benefit from a population that follows blindly?
WWG1WGA!
Pure Sun Tzu.
I fully agree, including the healthy skepticism.
Love my team.