It reads, “an employee shall not be required, as a condition of employment, to address another employee or any other person by a name other than the person’s legal name, or a derivative thereof, or to use pronouns, salutations, titles, or honorifics inconsistent with the other employee’s or person’s sex.”
summary:
A global elite of technocrats and billionaires is allegedly orchestrating a managed apocalypse to finalize the transition to a new world order. They are reportedly using nuclear war to collapse existing societal structures, intending to survive the resulting devastation in pre-constructed subterranean bunkers.
Occult patterns and Masonic symbols found in popular media and historical literature are interpreted as intentional signals of this long-term agenda. High-level secret societies and private gatherings are claimed to be the venues where these influential figures plan the dismantling of nations and the rise of a new global system.
The movement is framed as a foundational, Luciferian-driven project that views humanity as livestock to be managed by an elite council. This historical current, tracing back to ancient aspirations and modern technocracy, seeks to replace divine order with a godhead rooted in artificial intelligence.
While these powerful actors are actively preparing for an engineered catastrophe, the author asserts that these plans are already subject to final divine judgment. The ultimate outcome of history remains under the control of God, regardless of the preparations or influence held by this global brotherhood.
Mockery works great:
Lol! you're using labels!?!?! Haha, you know that means you're telling the world you can't argue on substance, and you're lacking emotional fortitude, right? Wow! the last time i ever did that was like.. grade 5.
Do not engage in definitions of words.. just ignore and negate their premises with better reason. They need you to start at their childish start line, but they falter when you move the start line into adulthood.
Removal: we already got it: https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASswfCOgy/dni-tulsi-gabbard-shines-the-spo/c/
"This One's for the Unborn"
(A parody of "This One's for the Children" - New Kids On the Block)
[Intro]
This is a very serious message
So all of you please listen
[Verse 1]
There are some people living in this world
A bundle of joy inside
They have much love to sow
They are the unborn
Who were yearning to see their mother
Just remember, we were them
Remember, they are our brothers
[Pre-Chorus]
I'm not trying to darken up your day
But help the unborn to live
And show them all our better way
[Chorus]
This one's for the unborn
The unborn of the world
This one's for the unborn
May God guide their soul
[Verse 2]
Many people are living
What millions had denied
Some people have the future
From babies who were cast aside
So for the sake of the unborn
Say that life is the only way to go
'Cause they are our tomorrow
And people, they've got to know
[Pre-Chorus]
I'm not trying to darken up your day
But help the unborn to live
And show them all our better way
[Chorus]
This one's for the unborn
The unborn of the world
This one's for the unborn
May God help their soul
This one's for the unborn
The unborn of the world
This one's for the unborn
May God show them His throne
[Outro]
This one's, for the unborn
(It's only for the unborn, the unborn of the world)
This one's, for the unborn
This one's, for the unborn
(Only for the unborn)
This one's, for the unborn
(The unborn of the world)
This one's, for the unborn
(Many people are living
Many unborn denied)
This one's, for the unborn
(But this one's for the unborn
And I'm so sad)
This one's, for the unborn
(The unborn of the world)
This one's, for the unborn
(Many people are living
What unborn were denied)
This one's, for the unborn
(But this one's for the unborn
To-day!)
-
First don't waste your time - they aren't interested in a serious debate or discussion, just in asserting their worldview.
-
Second, feed their question into an AI and modify the response
AI query:
I have a few leftists attacking me and asking what did we (USA) get in the Iran deal that we didn't have before the war in 2026?
response:
In the context of the ongoing 2026 US-Iran conflict (which escalated after February 2026), the US and Iran signed a 14-point Memorandum of Understanding (MoU, also called the Islamabad Memorandum) on or around June 17-18, 2026. This framework ends the active war/ceasefire, reopens the Strait of Hormuz, and sets up a 60-day window for final talks on a comprehensive deal (to be endorsed by a UN Security Council resolution). It was signed by President Trump, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, and mediated by Pakistan's PM.
The MoU is interim—not a permanent peace treaty. Iran commits to no nuclear weapons and IAEA-supervised handling of its enriched uranium stockpile (with a "minimum methodology" of on-site down-blending). The US commits to lifting the blockade, issuing oil export waivers, releasing frozen assets (procedures to be negotiated), and developing a $300 billion reconstruction/economic development plan for Iran (funded by the US and regional partners; implementation in the final deal). Sanctions relief and a final deal come later, contingent on compliance.
What the US specifically "got" (gains) from this deal that it didn't have before (pre-2026 escalation)
Before the 2026 war (which involved US/Israeli strikes on Iranian targets, Iran's closure/blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, attacks on shipping, and regional proxy fighting), the US had no formal peace with Iran, no reopened Hormuz, no access to Iranian oil revenue, no unfrozen assets, and an active naval blockade. The war disrupted global oil flows, spiked prices, and created immediate economic pressure (e.g., higher US gas prices).
-
Reopened Strait of Hormuz and full commercial shipping: Pre-war, Iran was actively blocking/attacking vessels in the strait (a chokepoint for ~20% of global oil). The MoU immediately ends the US blockade, allows safe passage (Iran handles demining/obstacles), and resumes pre-war traffic volumes. This restores oil exports from Iran, stabilizes global supply, and lowers US energy costs (reports of gas prices dropping below $4/gallon post-signing). This is a direct strategic win for US energy security and global markets.
-
Sanctions relief pathway: The MoU commits the US to terminating all sanctions (UN, IAEA, primary/secondary US) in an agreed schedule as part of the final deal. Pre-war, comprehensive US/Iranian sanctions were in place (or tightening). Now there's a formal mechanism for relief tied to compliance—reversing years of economic pressure without immediate full concession.
-
$300 billion reconstruction fund: The US and partners pledge (and are developing) at least $300 billion for Iran's post-war rebuilding and economy. This is framed as an investment in stability (not just a bailout), creating long-term US regional influence, reduced proxy threats, and a prosperous Iran that won't need adversaries. Pre-war, no such dedicated fund or economic carrots existed.
-
Unfrozen Iranian assets + oil export waivers: US Treasury issues waivers for Iranian oil sales immediately (until sanctions end), and assets become "fully available" (procedures to be negotiated). This provides Iran revenue for the war-ravaged economy while giving the US leverage and diplomatic reciprocity.
-
Ceasefire and reduced immediate threats: Permanent end to military operations on all fronts (including Lebanon/Israel-Iran proxies). US forces withdraw from proximity within 30 days of the final deal. No new sanctions or force deployments in the meantime (status quo). This de-escalates the war the US entered, avoids further casualties/economic fallout, and shifts focus to diplomacy.
In short, the US traded some short-term concessions (temporary oil waivers, asset access) for reopened sea lanes, economic stabilization, and a contained Iran—gains it didn't have before the 2026 war. Trump administration officials describe it as "give a little, get a lot," with the nuclear "dial" and relief as the main bargaining tools. Critics (including some US allies) argue it's too lenient or premature, but the text provides clear US wins on security and markets.
The 60-day final deal phase is where the real details (full sanctions lift, nuclear framework, UN endorsement) will be locked in. The MoU itself is already in effect, with implementation monitoring underway. This is the current status as of June 18, 2026.
So your answer would be:
We reopened sea lanes, gained economic stabilization, and a contained Iran. All gains we didn't have before the 2026 war.
if they scream at the sky, either use some other section from the text or feed their new whine into AI saying but the lefticle said "<paste>" i need you to shut them down and make their salty tears flow with truth and facts
Here's a pic to use for a meme base:
I get the feeling that Obama's block would be better to hang the deep state on the walls, frozen in carbonite.