Dang! Good catch!
Okay . . . so I know us moderators told y'all to cool it with Israel until Q gives us the signal, but we have GOT to acknowledge one very important detail about what my colleague u/LoneWulf just pointed out.
So in the new Snow White remake (that nobody asked for?) . . . the evil queen is played by Gal Gadot (an odd reverse casting, as she would have made a much better Snow White?) . . . We've known for some time that the casting directors in Hollywood are completely cucked, but this one is just bizarre.
According to Grok:
Gal Gadot was born on April 30, 1985, in Petah Tikva, Israel, and raised in nearby Rosh HaAyin. Before her Hollywood career, she served as a combat fitness instructor in the Israel Defense Forces and later won the Miss Israel pageant in 2004. Gadot initially pursued law studies but transitioned into acting, landing her first major role in the Israeli series Bubot. Her breakthrough came with the role of Gisele Yashar in the Fast & Furious franchise, which opened doors in Hollywood. Her ascent peaked when she was cast as Wonder Woman in the DC Extended Universe, starting with Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016), cementing her status as a global star and a symbol of strength and grace.
Alright Anons, don't get carried away with this one. I am merely pointing out a very interdasting possible comm with the Snow White / Israel connection.
Carry on . . . (respectfully!)
UP NEXT!
"Search the Epstein Files"
"Ask Grok about the Epstein Files: Is Tom Hanks a pedo? What's up with Hillary's snuff film? Why did Obama order tens of thousands of hotdogs? Is Pizza Gate real?"
Its gonna happen Anons! Mark my words!
The easiest way to avoid the wrath of the mod team is to provide direct sauce in your posts or comments!
As my colleague u/Brent75 pointed out, we want to be specific with our criticisms and our postulating. Providing direct sauce for specific individuals affiliated with major happenings is the best way to steer clear of potential vacations from the mod team.
Remember!
You are ELITE researchers.
Act like it.
God and his angels have been watching over President Trump his whole life. He was chosen to finish the mission that John F. Kennedy started.
I'm gonna need more popcorn!
All the cross dressing dudes that show up to the "phallus free" spa night.
My popcorn is ready!
We've got our own message for Zelensky!
Lets keep this comments section on topic in accordance with our board's rules.
Note the sidebar folks!
This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Topics related to flat earth theory, faked moon landings, and chemtrails are explicitly prohibited on The Great Awakening. Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!
I think President Trump is set to go on a crusade against the Federal Reserve and all Central Banks around the world.
Hey u/-q-bert-, what can you tell us about the history of central banking?
I couldn't resist.
So I've a theory about where DOGE may go from here.
Both Elon and President Trump have discussed returning a portion of the DOGE savings to the American people via some form of payment. Some have likened this to the stimulus checks under the C19 psy-op, but I've another plausible theory . . .
In the great state of Alaska there is a system called the Permanent Fund Dividend. Its a yearly payout to citizens of Alaska in the range of $2000 or so as a dividend on the oil that is produced across the state.
Recall recently that President Trump has discussed the creation of what he calls a Sovereign Wealth Fund. Both the PFD and the SWF share the common word fund. Many here on GAW have theorized over the years that the American people may see some form of repatriation of stolen wealth.
I asked GROK 3 about the plausibility of the Sovereign Wealth Fund being linked to some kind of DOGE dividend to the American people, and this is what was returned:
(You'll have to excuse the condensed formatting. GROK doesn't translate well to copy and paste, and this was a bit much to reformat tonight.)
- Conceptual Framework: Dividend vs. One-Time Payout Current Proposal: Trump’s X post and related discussions suggest returning 20% of DOGE savings to American citizens, often framed as a one-time refund or tax credit (e.g., $1,562–$256,410 per household, as calculated earlier). However, a dividend implies a recurring payment, akin to: A citizen’s dividend (Wikipedia), where citizens receive regular payments from shared national resources or wealth (e.g., Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend from oil revenues). A stakeholder model, where citizens are treated as owners of national assets, not just taxpayers funding government operations. Shift from "Tax Serfs" to Stakeholders: The X posts’ sentiment ("20% back to the people," "ultimate stimulus") and your phrasing suggest a desire to reframe citizens as beneficiaries of national wealth, not just burdened by taxes. A dividend could symbolize this shift, tying payments to ongoing management of recovered assets or savings.
- How Could This Work with "Stolen Wealth" or DOGE Savings? If DOGE uncovers a "massive trove of hidden wealth" (e.g., $5–$100 trillion in fraud, waste, or unreported assets, as discussed earlier), here’s how a dividend system might be structured: a. Source of the Dividend Recovered Fraud/Waste: If DOGE identifies and recovers funds from fraudulent payments, tax evasion, or mismanagement (e.g., $2.7 trillion in improper payments, per PJ Media, or tens of trillions over decades), these could be pooled into a fund. Ongoing Savings: DOGE’s mission to cut waste could generate continuous savings (e.g., $500 billion–$1 trillion annually, per GAO). A portion of these savings could fund a perpetual dividend. National Assets: If "stolen wealth" includes unreported federal assets (e.g., land, resources, or offshore funds), these could be managed as a sovereign wealth fund (Investopedia), distributing returns to citizens annually. b. Structure of the Dividend Sovereign Wealth Fund Model: Similar to Alaska’s Permanent Fund, DOGE could create a "U.S. Citizen’s Dividend Fund," seeded with recovered wealth or savings. The fund would invest in assets (stocks, bonds, real estate), and citizens receive annual dividends based on returns. Example: Alaska’s fund distributes ~$1,000–$2,000 per resident annually from oil revenues. If DOGE recovers $50 trillion, a fund earning 5% annually ($2.5 trillion) could distribute ~$19,531 per household (128 million) or ~$32,051 per tax-paying household (78 million) yearly. Percentage-Based Distribution: Instead of a one-time 20% payout, DOGE could allocate, say, 2–5% of annual recovered wealth or savings as a dividend, with the rest reinvested or used for debt reduction. Example: If DOGE saves $1 trillion annually, 5% ($50 billion) ÷ 128 million households = ~$390 per household yearly. Sliding Scale: As suggested in X posts (e.g., @JohnnyStack777 ), dividends could vary by years of tax payment, age, or income, ensuring fairness or prioritizing long-term contributors. c. Frequency and Administration Dividends could be paid annually, quarterly, or monthly, managed by the Treasury or a new agency under DOGE. Eligibility might include all citizens, tax-paying households, or adults only, with digital disbursements (e.g., direct deposits, UBI-style payments).
- Feasibility and Challenges a. Feasibility Precedent: The Alaska Permanent Fund (web result) and historical citizen’s dividends (e.g., Classical Athens, Wikipedia) show this is viable. DOGE’s savings could fund a similar system, especially if fraud totals reach trillions. Public Support: X posts indicate enthusiasm for "20% back to the people," suggesting citizens might embrace a dividend as a stake in national wealth, reducing "tax serf" resentment. Economic Benefits: A recurring dividend could stabilize household incomes, boost consumer spending, and reduce poverty, aligning with Musk’s and Trump’s goals (India Today, Newsweek). b. Challenges Verification of Wealth: As discussed, proving "stolen wealth" of tens or hundreds of trillions requires rigorous audits, international cooperation, and overcoming skepticism (NPR, Reuters). Sustainability: If DOGE savings taper off, the dividend might shrink, requiring alternative funding (e.g., natural resources, taxes), which could revert citizens to "tax serfs." Inflation Risk: Large or frequent dividends could overheat the economy, as seen in UBI debates (Wikipedia). The Federal Reserve might need to tighten monetary policy. Political Resistance: Congress, agencies, or interest groups (e.g., contractors benefiting from federal spending) might oppose diverting funds to citizens, citing debt reduction or program needs. Administrative Complexity: Tracking eligibility, preventing fraud, and managing a fund would require significant bureaucracy, potentially undermining DOGE’s efficiency goals.
- What Would This Look Like? Scenario 1: $50 Trillion Recovered Wealth Create a U.S. Citizen’s Dividend Fund with $50 trillion. Invest at 5% annual return = $2.5 trillion/year. Distribute 2% ($1 trillion) annually: ~$7,812 per household (128 million) or ~$12,821 per tax-paying household (78 million). Remaining 98% ($1.5 trillion) could reduce debt or reinvest, ensuring sustainability. Scenario 2: Ongoing $1 Trillion Annual Savings Allocate 5% ($50 billion) as a dividend: ~$390 per household yearly. Scale up if savings grow (e.g., $2 trillion/year = ~$780 per household). Stakeholder Impact: Citizens become shareholders in national wealth, receiving regular payments (e.g., $390–$12,821/year) instead of one-time payouts. This could foster pride, reduce tax resentment, and align with the X posts’ optimism.
- Benefits of a Dividend Over a One-Time Payout Long-Term Stake: Citizens feel like owners of national resources, not just taxpayers, addressing the "tax serfs" concern. Economic Stability: Recurring payments smooth income fluctuations, unlike a one-time windfall prone to spending sprees or debt repayment. Political Appeal: A permanent dividend could cement political support for Trump and DOGE, fulfilling the "20% back to the people" promise sustainably. Precedent Alignment: Matches Alaska’s model and citizen’s dividend concepts (Wikipedia), grounding it in historical practice.
- Context from X Posts and Web Results X Posts: The excitement about "20% back to the people" and calls for fairness (e.g., sliding scales, debt forgiveness) suggest public openness to a dividend. Skepticism ("Bullshit. I want every damn cent") indicates a demand for transparency and tangible benefits, which a dividend could address. Web Results: Alaska’s Permanent Fund (Investopedia) shows dividends work for natural resources; DOGE savings could substitute for oil revenues. Citizen’s dividends (Wikipedia) tie payments to shared wealth, aligning with "stolen wealth" recovery. GAO and PJ Media data on fraud ($2.7 trillion) provide a foundation for funding, though scaling to trillions requires verification.
- Potential Risks and Mitigations
Risk: Unsustainable Funding
Mitigation: Reinvest most recovered wealth, using only a small percentage (2–5%) for dividends, ensuring long-term viability. Risk: Inequality
Mitigation: Use sliding scales (e.g., higher payments for long-term taxpayers) or means-testing, as suggested in X posts. Risk: Bureaucratic Overreach
Mitigation: Leverage DOGE’s efficiency mandate and AI tools (Musk’s approach) to minimize administrative costs.
- Final Thoughts Yes, we could see a scenario where American citizens receive a recurring dividend—e.g., $390–$12,821 per household annually—based on DOGE’s recovery of "stolen wealth" or ongoing savings. This would reframe citizens as stakeholders in their nation, reducing the "tax serfs" narrative and aligning with historical dividend models. However, feasibility depends on verifying massive fraud, sustaining savings, and overcoming political hurdles. If DOGE uncovers tens or hundreds of trillions, a dividend could transform the U.S. fiscal landscape, but careful design is needed to avoid inflation, inequality, or inefficiency.
The salty tears from the Deep State are going to be epic!
Link to the article: https://www.grandforksherald.com/opinion/columns/ben-shapiro-why-does-it-matter-who-shot-jfk