From Yelena Dzhanova with Business Insider's email to Andrew Torba of GAB [emphasis mine]:

We're researching a story that will list some of the most notable people who have supported the Q Anon movement, publicized its conspiracy theories, or given its activists a platform to spread their fictitious stories.

The purpose of the story is to identify the people behind QAnon who have been most publicly visible in promoting QAnon, and extending its influence online and inside the Republican Party.

So let's break this down. Yelena from Business Insider is working on a piece that will focus on publicly calling out Q supporters for supposedly "publicizing conspiracy theories" and on platforms like Gab for allowing Q and its supporters to "spread their fictitious stories."

Good gavy! The bias is strong with this one!

Here's the most insidious thing: Yelena outright states that they are looking to identify followers and call them out publicly. Based on her short email, how likely is it that any followers identified in Business Insider's upcoming hit piece will be treated fairly? Or with any sort of dignity or respect?

You will be included in this article because you welcomed QAnon accounts to move over to Gab after Facebook's ban of "Q" content. [This time the emphasis appears to be Yelena's.]

Even further, she makes a point to call out Andrew and Gab for welcoming Q followers when they were deplatformed by Facebook. If this doesn't smack of attempted intimidation I don't know what does.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: my initial choice to follow the Q movement started due to the MSM's obviously transparent attempts to shut it down. My continued and growing support for the Q movement comes from watching MSM's ever more shrill and desperate efforts to discredit the message.

WWG1WGA!