What's wrong with this picture
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (16)
sorted by:
Looks like the houses were targeted, but the vegetation and trees weren't and survived.
If this was a wildfire, why didn't it destroy everything in the area?
Pretty much. I can tell you from years of experience the radial (lateral) heat generated by a structure that burns to the ground would certainly light up everything around it. This is not natural
Lots, lots more like that.
Let's play a game: Covid is to pandemic like wildfires are to global _______
raaaaaacism
Baptism by fire? Armageddon? Nuclear winter? Come on, I’m dying to know. Help me out here.
... warming.
Ohhh, gotcha ??
Same in Brazilian Amazon: the left burns it, pictures it, sell to MSM and says we are burning the forest. No other people on this planet LOVES more NATURE than average Brazilians, that's why we are the country with the most preserved tropical environments on Earth.
They want to destroy the Amazon to get all natural resources there, accusing us from their crimes. Venezuela/Cuba deep on this (and trafficking drugs-weapons-people): https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2019/08/22/brazil-bolsonaro-suggests-ngos-started-amazon-wildfires-after-cutting-their-funding/
This is the reason your homes are built out of softwood.
What do microwaves do? They cook your food from the inside out. Thicker objects require significantly more time in the microwave than a thinner object.
Interesting, I was wondering what weapon was used. Is the thinking that an orbital weapon was used? or like the weapon China used against India?
That is the trillion dollar question.
I am seeing many totally burned trees and burned grass.
Sure, there is certainly fire damage everywhere. what looks odd to me is that homes burned 100% to the ground, but trees seemingly feet away not only are still standing, but in many cases still contain green needs. Spruce/Pine/Fir is also a softwood. Almost like the houses were targeted || I.E.Arson under the cover of emergency (or energy weapons as is alluded above) rather than a fire line swept over. Granted, i also dont know what types of structures used to be there. Older home will burn lightyears faster than modern homes
Specifically, the trees in the center of the picture do look like what I'd expect all the trees to look like if a wind-blown forest fire moved through an urban/suburban area. With all the embers floating in the air (especially after a building collapse) i dont see how branches survive. If the houses were not completely raised to the ground, it would be less suspect to see trees undamaged. Can it be 100% proven? no, and even a quick google search returns images that look similar (though, the ones i found had trees much farther from the homes)
Where is this? What happened here?
This photograph was taken above some of the homes destroyed in Cali wildfire. I do not have specifics but search image on Google and it'll pop up. These houses and their surroundings don't match is the general consensus