11.3? First marker? Supreme Court? - The Great Awakening

11.3? First marker? Supreme Court? (twitter.com)

posted 4 years ago by catsfive 4 years ago by catsfive +57 / -0

35 comments

35 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (35)

sorted by:

▲ 20 ▼

– WaaPow 20 points 4 years ago +20 / -0

That is my question as well, I was just over at the donald.win and people are pissed, emotions running high, talk of civil war, pitch forks and torches time. I'm curious what the strategy going forward is going to be from this point.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 28 ▼

– MLOC 28 points 4 years ago +29 / -1

With donald.win, it really doesn't take much. They tend to take every setback however large, however small to heart. To me, the strategy hasn't changed. The military is the only way.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 16 ▼

– BurnerAcct42069 16 points 4 years ago +16 / -0

Its more upsetting to me because this non-decision opens up pandoras box. The constitution officially no longer matters when states can openly ignore it and other states cant even get a day in court to call them out on it.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 10 ▼

– MLOC 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

How do you 'show' the public the truth? How do you 'safeguard' US elections post-POTUS? How do you 'remove' foreign interference and corruption and install US-owned voter ID law(s) and other safeguards? It had to be this way. Sometimes you must walk through the darkness before you see the light. Q

I've been thinking about this part of post 4951 from Q for weeks now. I'm starting to understand what Q was really asking.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– VoterIDMatters 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

and what is the answer?

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q