He IMPLIED that he was someone important with access to inside information. And I think by picking the letter E, he strongly hinted that he was Ezra. But no he never claimed to be anyone in particular.
Triangulating the truth requires knowledge of all possibilities, in this case.... what are the narratives, and who are the sources etc. I'm not sure on E, but he mirrors Flynn quite a bit, at least is in step with Flynn regarding messaging, but still seeds narratives on his own like this Pence one.
He IMPLIED that he was someone important with access to inside information. And I think by picking the letter E, he strongly hinted that he was Ezra. But no he never claimed to be anyone in particular.
Triangulating the truth requires knowledge of all possibilities, in this case.... what are the narratives, and who are the sources etc. I'm not sure on E, but he mirrors Flynn quite a bit, at least is in step with Flynn regarding messaging, but still seeds narratives on his own like this Pence one.
E is a larp.
But this particular post is good imo, as he is reseeding this:
https://americandigitalnews.com/index.php/2017/08/19/pence-ryan-2016-emails-and-the-cleveland-deal/
I lean towards Pence being a well-placed betrayer. We'll see tomorrow
Who says it's a guy? Never Ass+U+ME