Lin Wood has been right about some important things but has also been compared with a "carnival barker". This morning's Parler post about the Pope being arrested from a garbage page is especially difficult to excuse.
Is there a plausible "white hat" explanation for his posting?
Is it possible for a tremendously successful attorney to also be a naïve boomerposter?
Is he playing a role?
In information warfare, usefulness and truth are often unrelated - and if WE knew WHY specific things were being posted, so would the enemy.
It's not like you can just say "We're spreading a false rumor that the pope was arrested to increase the visibility of Italy's actions. If all goes well the intentional misinformation becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy." without defeating the point.