Feel free to deport if im doing this wrong but i found this interesting.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (52)
sorted by:
Trump clearly won - I estimate he got more than 70% of the vote. Dominium is more of a symptom than a cause. The real fraud lies in the election SYSTEM itself. Trump knows that taking down the Dominium fraud alone is not going to solve the problem - because the problem is that the SYSTEM is corrupt.
Some of you may say I'm talking out my rear - and I assure you I'm not. There's going to be a LOT more coming out about the fraud and our election SYSTEM as a whole. Fact: They had a system in place to guarantee a win for HRC in 2016. I believe it involved overseas operations with a different twist than we saw with Domiuum in 2020, and it was interrupted. Remember the pauses in PA and Oh in 2016 - how they kept stringing that out? Almost like they were waiting for something that never showed?
The cabal would not employ the same method in 2020 that they knew had been interrupted in 2016, right? There was a reason we didn't see the extra ballots in 2016 - they thought they didn't need them. The extra ballots, absent in 2016, resurfaced again in 2018 and 2020. Domiunium was present all those years - so if it was Dominium (or other machine companies) alone, why the change?
I also believe that we may see a surprise out of Georgia. Of course, I could be wrong, but we can all agree that some things are certainly not what they seem
Can you expand on that?
Some background: The Globalists use a systems approach to EVERYTHING - This is probably the most important thing we need to understand about the way they work. They look at EVERY part of a system and find a way to control it. Gaining control commonly involves financial "incentives," infiltration, acquisition, and, if necessary, destruction (like hacks or scandals that ruin public trust.)
So what are the parts of our election system? I'm going to keep this basic, but you'll get it.
Policy and legislation from local to federal levels - includes everything from choices of software and equipment to election laws at all gov levels
Election administrators - SOS, election directors at all gov levels
Election technology - Software, machines, registration systems
Election workers - staffing the polls, canvassers, training, etc
Third parties - USPS and other service/supply providers
Public education - usually NGOs
Election security - everything from physical chain of custody at local levels to federal cybersecurity
By this simple list alone, you'll clearly see that there voting machines are only one cog in the system - and, as I said, the Globalists have every cog covered - because that's how they work. And they alternately use each part of the system to advance their goals in another part of the system. Let's say they want to change voting laws. They'll use the SOS (via NASS) to address legislatures that they need XYZ fixed through new legislation. Then they'll have the NGOs (all receiving Globalist funding) to write letters/testify about how important it is that XYZ get passed. The public is entirely removed from the equation. I can't tell you how many Congressional hearings (and, believe me, this isn't confined to elections) where there might be five people testifying who appear to be from different groups (and technically are) but they're all funded from the same source.
They use this same strategy to implement everything the want - the legislatures say "well this must be good because NASS recommends it," while NASS say "this must be good because all these separate NGOs are supporting it." They control EVERY aspect of the system this way, and it's VERY effective.
We will never have election integrity without dismantling the existing system and creating a new one. I personally believe We The People need to take elections entirely back into our own hands. Hand-counted paper ballots counted by two or three different groups (unaware of the others' totals) independent groups with totals posted at each precinct. Obviously, there's a lot more I can expand on with this.
Open-source voting systems have also been suggested, but a word of warning here. Many things touted as open source aren't truly open source - they are proprietary open source. True open-source is general public license open source, and "they" are trying to trick the public because most people don't realize there's a distinction.
Blockchain is also suggested - but I personally believes that we need a voting system that EVERY citizen can understand and that contains no proprietary components.
Elections should belong to We The People and no one else. The question is are we willing to take on the responsibility of that? I think we're nearing the point where most of America is saying "yes."
You're saying that the real problem is 9 or 10 times removed from our actual election process. They only control the top of the system because they influence the bottom of it. So even with a national Voter ID system, its less important to know who's running it and more important to know who picked the person who picked them to run it.
We don't just need a new system. We need a new system so unencumbered that we can spit in the air and hit the guy who handles it from start to finish.
It really will be necessary to put this back in the hands of We the People.