If a certain anon that came by here is right - this part of the speech was Trump hinting to us what is to come.
Under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution, "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."
Remember, Trump said in his "concession" tweet - every "legal" avenue; “every legal avenue to contest the election results”
History will show that Donald Trump tried every legal avenue to solve this crisis against our Constitution. It will show that all others failed to address this Act of Treason. He tried to resolve this peacefully. His only recourse left was to use the military, but it will be a LAWFUL use of the military as these people have broken their oaths and committed TREASON and INSURRECTION. And President Donald J. Trump is LEGALLY REQUIRED to act on this because of his own oath to the Constitution, to protect our Republic from enemies Foreign AND DOMESTIC.
Who says there's no hope? Looks to me like things are on track. Especially after Pompeo's VOA speech. The way that Trump worded this statement at the rally - the upholding of the Constitution is presented as a punishment for failure.
I believe Trump understands that if he fails, he, his family, and everyone that helped him will... For lack of better description, be rounded up into concentration camps. There is no way out if he gives up.
The only way he loses the game, is if the entire US Military is in on the operation, and he was set up to fail from day one so that we would never see another populist-right politician again. That would require the whole of the US Military to betray the founding principles of their existence - so if that's the case, then there is nothing left to save in this country. Period.
I can only pray that he succeeds. I can only assume we were let in on declassified yet unreported information through "outside comms" from a no-name drifter.
Arguably, but that is a nuanced matter, and the case could probably be made against any of the three branches and be reasonably compelling. The bigger issue is the number of wannabe branches: big tech, news media, intelligence agencies, 'activist groups' that are actually simultaneously a paramilitary wing of one particular political party and a funnel for illegal campaign donations to that party. All of these groups exercise powers comparable to branches of government despite their lack of accountability.
If a certain anon that came by here is right - this part of the speech was Trump hinting to us what is to come.
Remember, Trump said in his "concession" tweet - every "legal" avenue; “every legal avenue to contest the election results”
Who says there's no hope? Looks to me like things are on track. Especially after Pompeo's VOA speech. The way that Trump worded this statement at the rally - the upholding of the Constitution is presented as a punishment for failure.
I believe Trump understands that if he fails, he, his family, and everyone that helped him will... For lack of better description, be rounded up into concentration camps. There is no way out if he gives up.
The only way he loses the game, is if the entire US Military is in on the operation, and he was set up to fail from day one so that we would never see another populist-right politician again. That would require the whole of the US Military to betray the founding principles of their existence - so if that's the case, then there is nothing left to save in this country. Period.
I can only pray that he succeeds. I can only assume we were let in on declassified yet unreported information through "outside comms" from a no-name drifter.
14th A + Sec 3 = 17 = Q
I only have one word that can describe this... Based.
Egregious assault on our democracy? Is one branch too powerful?
Arguably, but that is a nuanced matter, and the case could probably be made against any of the three branches and be reasonably compelling. The bigger issue is the number of wannabe branches: big tech, news media, intelligence agencies, 'activist groups' that are actually simultaneously a paramilitary wing of one particular political party and a funnel for illegal campaign donations to that party. All of these groups exercise powers comparable to branches of government despite their lack of accountability.