Agreed. Your view is a good take. Trying to chess block additional violence by letting her have the upper hand. And as Anons may have noticed by the “protestors” outside, not much action took place. And they were in place to act out, but no agenda ammo was provided for them to reasonably do so.
The Mods are not “infiltrated”. Maybe you are with the sudden divisive change? I hope not.
Anyway, the Mods decide what gets stickied and you don’t. Also the acceleration of our whole movement was the Awakening to such awful things being done, coming to light and not just conspiracy.
I understand the side effects. Just didn’t mention them because I forgot, while calling on the Anon whom used MSM to attempt to justify a position with NO, ZERO, NONE, ZIP, prior personal or professional experience in the realm of psychiatry, or psychiatric patient treatment, besides a 6 month trial of “a med that did nothing”. That was the Anon’s only blip to undermine professional and personal experience going back 25 years on the severely mentally ill that I worked with.
My whole point, especially being here in GAW is, if you’re going to debate another Anon, then back it up with proper techniques and info, and not just, “I read it in the news and took 1 pill for a few months, so I’m an expert now”. That was the point I was making to that Anon.
So I get your piece, but I didn’t go further, because as you can read, the called forth Anon had nothing further to “expert” on. Thank you for your assistance and additions though. God bless you Anon.
Now see, your response has back up and experience. Thank you Tweety. I had to call out the other Anon that brought nothing to back his nothingburger but using his reading of MSN News. That was my point in calling. And your response is what a true Anon here should lay down in a factual discussion. And I can’t argue your personal experience, because why? It’s yours, real, and not told by “fake news”. God bless you Anon.
You didn’t read my entire thread Anon. Go back and carefully read what I wrote again. Especially at the bottom.
And to then discount someone’s combined personal and professional experience when you have none……That’s just a wee bit cave-living hypocrisy yourself Anon.
I’ve done my homework on this subject and lived it. I don’t want to debate but if you’d like to assault me on my knowledge, education, and professional experience regarding psychiatric treatments and results, you’d better brush up on about 20 years of psychiatric hospital work experience quickly, and get a handy psychiatric data-base to link off of, because I’m already prepped.
Oh wait….. you’ve already admitted you’ve just read the “news reports” on these shooters.
Debate over already. News reports don’t mean shit compared to long term treatment data and actual experience. Good night.
Not if used correctly, and for someone with an actual mental health issue/chemical imbalance besides a situational caused stressor. I spent 24 years working with the severely mentally ill youth and adults, and 18 years of that doing direct 5150 evals to lock people in psyc hospitals. I’ve seen all levels on meds, getting and shots. Only real/true severe personality disorder/sociopaths, Schizophrenia, severe PTSD, and manic bi-polar are the only potential violent mentally ill folk. The rest have a like 1-2% chance of committing violent crimes, when not on meth or other psychedelics.
People spinning out off Anti-depressants usually harm/kill themselves.
No most of these shootings, heavy and violent crimes are done by upper-drugs induced, brainwashed/coerced by Feds, or are an untreated violent mentally ill or severely situationally pissed off homicidal person.
Heck I take a solid anti-depressant dose and have no desire to wipe out anyone. And when I’ve been off them I just want to be in a dark closet, not go put on a rampage. Most of the tens of thousands of clients I worked with reported much of the same on/off their anti-depressant meds.
But, but meds used incorrectly for incorrect diagnosis’s or to even coerce one into certain actions….. that is something sadly, well studied and tested by the CIA.
I hope so. But my sails are running thin my friend. I haven’t even felt motivated to finish my other articles on Juan, Ingersoll, and Q. We’ve been told “soon” for so long. Trust I still have faith, but my patience is at a low right now. 😐 I’ll be okay though. I know big stuff is coming.
Yes Anon. I think it’s the physical part. No matter how much Bitcoin I have on the blockchain, I can never hold it in my hand. And an EMP could, “could” potentially delete it and all records.
But a physical coin, dollar, or Bond in my hand is physically able to be held, hidden, and saved or spent outside any digital/blockchain/EMP destruction control.
It’s the tangible physical ownership like a car or a house or a toy or a tree in your yard. You can tangibally trade/sell things like that or not. But Bitcoin on a computer/blockchain can NEVER become physically tangible to hide/save/spend off the range/grid, without a record of a prying eye or possibility of EMP loss.
That’s what I think is the base frustration over even the Patriots wanting a digital currency over a physical currency.
Bitcoin is not nor ever will be 100% in my control. But my Silver Dollar or quarter, $100 Bond or Bill is physical and I can take it off the grid to do as I please. That’s what is trying to be debated.
And I get it. I’m one that wants both tangible cash equal to digital cash/crypto. But I can always exchange between the two at any moment, forever. And if the power goes out or there is an EMP, I want the option to still have physical cash that is the value of what it says on its face for trade.
Anon never replied so I took it down.