There should also be a Yacht next to that pile.
Here is the source study referred in the article.
Remotely controlled electro-responsive on-demand nanotherapy based on amine-modified graphene oxide for synergistic dual drug delivery
Also the paper is just a research study into this process of using this specifically modified graphene oxide and determining the signal necessary etc.
It does not claim that it can be done with any substance that contains GO.
Do you have any evidence to show that the mRNA vaccines indeed contains this specific amine-modified graphene oxide which has been programmed as per this paper?
I did not find anything to back this up in your post nor in the article cited. Point me to where you make this connection, otherwise kindly repost with a title that actually suits whats in the paper.
(This is not to say that the vaccines do not react to 5G signals, just that these articles do not back it up).
Haha, just came here to say this. Getting spicy.
We will wait and see. Where Mike us concerned there is always more than meets the eye.
There is a difference between CBDC and resource backed decentralized DC.
Personally I believe DC is inevitable in future. I have discussed this with many patriots who are vehemently against any kind of DC.
The crux of contention comes down to "I don't want the govt knowing how much I earn".
Good point. But then I ask, "what if there is no income tax"
They think for a bit and his them - they don't care in that case, but the fact that they can transparently track the government or politician or even criminals makes it all click.
Yes, key to DC is abolishing income tax.
Her is not talking about the FBI criminals but protestors
Johnson emphasized the importance of protecting those who participated in the events of January 6 from DOJ charges and other concerns.
Collectively the rest of the world lost their right to criticise Kim Jong un, considering we have lived under much worse psyops for much longer.
At least he is talking about it. When was the last time any of us felt emotional about the dealt fact that humanity if headed towards extinction?
Of all the cabal pushed ideologies (is there another kind?) feminism took the sharpest U turn the fastest.
Nah, someone was asking about General Chat, and suddenly decided to delete those comments.
Citizen Arrests!
Search for 16 year plan to destroy America. There is a Q drop for it as well. It explains exactly what would have happened.
Did they hire the Jan 6th committee to manage their footages?
Could be a scene from one of those caveman movies where your passport is a charred piece of wood, and at the port of entry they make a mark on it by scratching it with a sharp stone. When the piece crumbles you are denied entry, kek.
This was from Feb 2020. When Anonymous made a comeback to headlines after hacking UN website to post pro Taiwan message.
Context is King, and diggers like you who bring us the context are the best!
"creatives" are the most dangerous products of this education system. Those are the kids from amongst whom, the enemy picks and chooses those that can produce content that destroys morals and social cohesion.
Its on a script, I had forgotten to turn it off yet!
"There are tons of people referred to as Anonymous." So why (logically) would the reporter ask Trump who Anonymous is, if the reporter is talking about 'tons of people?'
Are you really this slow? Don't you get why I keep asking for "context" ? Don'y you understand why I asked you to post the full clip? Because thats how we answer the question "Which Anonymous is being referred to here?"
Seems like a logical fallacy and failure on your part to realize that the reporter probably meant "QAnon," but misspoke and said Anonymous.
Do you always leap across Grand Canyon when jumping to conclusions ?
Remember, that at the time, Anonymous was not really relevent
At what time? See, again, why context is important? I dont even know when exactly this clip was from, and you refuse to do your job and dig it up before making assumptions that, frankly, sounds like covering up for the fact that you blatantly mistitled the post.
I don't even know what you are refering to as far as a 'full clip.' what else is there to see.
Alright, looks like I have to spell it out what should be obvious for any self respecting researcher of anything.
Full clip = the full video of this interview, or at least the clip that includes what they talked about before this question.
What else is there to see? Here are some of the things we need to know before jumping to conclusions.
-
When was this interaction?
-
What events were happening on the news cycle during that specific time?
-
What were they discussing before the reporter asked this question, in that interview?
So, your BS sorry excuse of an argument is basically as dead as the Leticia James case against Trump. Straight up soy based nothing burger!
Ah, mod greifing. Sweet. Thanks for making it so easy for us, even after explicit warning.
FYI, this site seems to be moderated nearly to death.
If this site was moderated nearly to death, your post wouldnt even be up, and your comments wouldnt even be up, and yet here were are. So generously allowing you to scream you stupidity from the roof tops.
Remember, the we mods always try to do whats best for the community.
This current change was catalysed by the fact that many people complained that posting "low effort" posts in General Chat was useless since very few people get to see it before it rolls over.
If you disagree with anything we mods do, the correct way to be heard is by providing your feedback, via modmail, respectfully. The worst thing you can do is to argue rudely in public (not referring to you here, just in general) even while making good points.
Because there are tons of people referred to as Anonymous. Because when mainstream talks about Q they always say Q Anon. Because we have seen Trump being asked in the past about Q referred as "Q Anon".
I have seen all your arguments in this post. If you wish to continue this discussion further, please make sure you include the full clip. Don't complain later I did not give you a fair warning.
Just a standard pretext to drag US into a WW3.
This is an experiment, we will see how it goes. We wont have more than one general threads at a time, so until this plays out we wont be posting General Chat. Based on user feedback and how things play out we will either continue with the weekly chat, or revert back to the General Chat.
Kagan is very deep Cabal. We had some digs in the past.
Oh cant wait for the REEEEEEEEEEs !