Hear me out and think past the Deep State’s indoctrination. Q has mentioned several times that changes would be made to prevent all this from ever happening again. He mentioned independent auditors. How well did the independent “auditors”/watchers work in preventing/exposing the election counting? In order to prevent evildoers from having monopoly power over us, we need to remove their primary weapon, which is government, and replace it with a true Free Market. Liberty and Freedom.
Government is monopoly power, with unlimited funding via theft/enslavement, that forces socialized monopoly services on us. It’s a lot easier for the evildoers to gain control of a singular monopoly power wield it against us than to gain control of dozens or hundreds of privatized companies providing those same services in a Free Market.
Who here supports socialism, even for courts, security, roads, etc? How’s the horrible quality and lack of accountability in those devices working out for us? What about the Constitution, which either enabled the evildoers to gain monopoly power over us, or was too weak to prevent it?
All services can alternatively be provided by multiple competing private companies in a free market. Competition generates better quality, better prices, more innovation, and accountability.
We’ve proven we can’t keep the Republic. The falsely perceived authority of Government is derived from “the consent of the governed”, but at any given time it is obvious that the majority of us don’t fully consent to it. We need a true free society with a real free market, where everyone votes with their dollars and is their own ruler, and is forced to be responsible individuals if they don’t want to have to live on charity for life.
Aaaand pure free market becomes stifling monopoly. You need some rules to bind the freedom, or else you get anarchy. The constitution didn't fail, WE failed, due to the natural entropy that afflicts civilization.
You reject the Free Market because it MIGHT become what we have today? No, in a free market, there won’t be laws rigged to favor one company or industry or technology over another. If a monopoly formed on a service in the Free Market, it would be because its service was such high quality, it was warranted. But the right for competitors to be created (a new Parler or Gab) would always be there.
A free market would still have rules. The word “anarchy” literally means “without rulers”. It does not mean without rules, and does not mean “chaos”, as your government indoctrination would say. There will always be societal rules, and there would be contracts in a free market.
The natural entropy thing is a lie. That cycle is directly caused by the error of government.
I reject unchecked markets. Even Adam Smith gave reasons for tariffs (national security and development of homeland skills, for instance).
I suggest you read more history. Every single society seems to go through phases, and we were in decline for so long we're at a "crisis point" now. Whether we survive and move forward, or descend into chaos is not yet written.
There aren’t many instances in history where they intentionally imposed a true free market. There was a region of Ireland that did successfully for 400 years though. Other societies always end up replacing their failed government with a new form of it.
The Free Market would not be “unchecked”. It is inherently self-regulating, because people have an interest in spending their hard earned money only on the providers that are confirmed to provide the best value/quality, etc. Compare that to a forced monopoly that has the illusion of regulations, which are merely laws written by the highest bidders to favor their chosen companies technologies or industries as the winners.