"https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746?
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q"
Hey man honestly that's looking too much into it, the question was clear and he said he knew nothing about it because Q said POTUS had to appear neutral for optical tactics.
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746?
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
He's not lying. He knows nothing about "Qanon" because "Qanon" isn't a real thing. There's Q and there's anons. He knew what he was doing ;)
but Q answered that himself after that inter view: https://qanon.pub/#4881
"https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746? There is 'Q'. 1 There are 'Anons'. 2 There is no 'Qanon'. 3 Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]? DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS? Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected]. You are correct, CJ. Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?] Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop? Welcome to the Digital Battlefield. Q"
Hey man honestly that's looking too much into it, the question was clear and he said he knew nothing about it because Q said POTUS had to appear neutral for optical tactics.
Still, if he was solely responding to "Qanon", it would be common knowledge to acknowledge "Q"
Not if you're taking the words literally.
Trump has been through enough media cycles and legal challenges to live and breathe this mentality by now.
That being said, I didn't notice the sarcastic inflection on "QAnon" until it was just now pointed out. Absolutely savage
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746? There is 'Q'. 1 There are 'Anons'. 2 There is no 'Qanon'. 3 Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]? DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS? Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected]. You are correct, CJ. Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?] Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop? Welcome to the Digital Battlefield. Q