I was dooming some yesterday and was getting frustrated and tired from all the disinformation out there...so i was like you know what i'm just going to reread all the q posts. Since doing so...This is actually the most confident i've ever been....No outside comms. Yeah could pomeo be dropping hints sure, but EVERYTHING IS HERE. q said: you have more than you know. Look at what I've discovered just in the first few drops....
first just a tiny crumb i found the origins of Q because Q said "What is Q clearance" Q clearance is "atomic clearance" or the highest level of security clearance you can have. so theres that. look up q clearance in the internet archive wayback machine and click texts
HERE IS THE JUICE GOODS
q post #11 Key: Military Intelligence v FBI CIA NSA No approval or congressional oversight State Secrets upheld under SC Who is the Commander and Chief of the military? Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies? What conditions must present itself? Why is this so VERY important? Who surrounds POTUS? They lost this very important power _ the one area of the govt not corrupt and directly serves POTUS.
WHAT I'VE FOUND: MI VS FBI CIA NSA Okay military intelligence is directly under POTUS so no approval or congressional oversight is needed
**STATE SECRETS ** ESSENTIALLY this means the executive branch of the government (POTUS) doesn't have to tell anyone anything in the court of law if they don't want to.
HERE WE GO **UNDER WHAT ARTICLE CAN THE PRESIDENT IMPOSE MI TAKE OVER INVESTIGATIONS FOR THE 3 LETTER AGENCIES? WHAT CONDITIONS MUST PRESENT ITSELF? **
Article II Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, the Commander in Chief clause, states that "[t]he President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, **when called into the actual Service of the United States..." **
INSURRECTION ACT §253. Interference with State and Federal law The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it— (1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or (2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. The Insurrection ACT allows POTUS to use military as a police force in the event of terrorist act, natural disasters and disorder that state police cannot contain
TO ANYONE STATING THAT HE CAN'T DO THAT BECAUSE OF THE POSSE COMITATUS ACT LEMME THROW THIS AT U BB
Under the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, Congress has limited the president’s ability to use the federal (title 10) military in domestic law enforcement operations such as searches, seizures, and arrests. A criminal statute, the Posse Comitatus Act makes it unlawful for the Army or Air Force to “execute the laws … except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress.”
BUT WAIT THERE'S MORE** The Act specifically applies only to the United States Army and, as amended in 1956, the United States Air Force. Although the Act does not explicitly mention the United States Navy and the United States Marine Corps, the Department of the Navy has prescribed regulations that are generally construed to give the Act force with respect to those services as well. The Act does not prevent the Army National Guard or the Air National Guard under state authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within its home state or in an adjacent state if invited by that state's governor. **The United States Coast Guard (under the Department of Homeland Security) and United States Space Force (under the Department of the Air Force) are not covered by the Act either, **primarily because although both are armed services, they also have maritime and space law enforcement missions respectively.
**Currently, the Mayor of the District of Columbia is popularly elected to a four-year term with no term limits. Even though District of Columbia is not a state, the district government also has certain state-level responsibilities, making some of the mayor's duties analogous to those of United States governors. **
OH THATS WEIRD....
10 U.S. Code § 12406 - National Guard in Federal service: call
(1)the United States, or any of the Commonwealths or possessions, is invaded or is in danger of invasion by a foreign nation; (2)there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States; or (3)the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States; the President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as he considers necessary to repel the invasion, suppress the rebellion, or execute those laws. Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States or, in the case of the District of Columbia, through the commanding general of the National Guard of the District of Columbia.
PRESIDENT TRUMP IS IN COMPLETE CONTROL OF THE NATIONAL GUARD AND THE ENTIRE MILITARY BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN DEPLOYED WITHIN THE UNITED STATES. THE INSURRECTION ACT IS IN EFFECT DUE TO THE REQUEST OF MILITARY BEING PRESENT IN WASHINGTON DC, HIS CALL TO DISPERSE, AND THE POLICE'S INABILITY TO CONTROL THE “RIOTS” AND MEMBERS OF ANTIFA THAT HE HAS DEEMED A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION DURING JANUARY 6TH SEIGE OF THE CAPITOL, WHICH IS AN EMERGENCY. HE CAN INSTRUCT THE MILITARY TO DO ANYTHING HE DEEMS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION.
ASK YOURSELF, WHY ARE THERE SO MANY DAMN TROOPS IN WASHINGTON DC FOR A VIRTUAL INAUGURATION? WHO IS THE THREAT? WHAT IS BEING THREATENED? BIDEN??????? OR THE CONSTITUTION?
ALSO LOOK AT THESE IM STILL RESEARCHING : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriot_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeland_Security_Act_of_2002 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Commissions_Act_of_2006
and most IMPORTANTLY THIS SEXY LIL EXECUTIVE ORDER https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2018-amendments-manual-courts-martial-united-states/
Here’s another question regarding your closing example. Why so many NG troops deployed to DC for a virtual inauguration? Great question that many of us have been asking. But remember, the legacy lying media states that Amazon retired threats to its data centers across all 50 states, and that there will be armed protests all across all 50 states.
Well.. let’s break that in half. First off, Amazon AWS has massive data centers in certain regions such as US-East-1 in North Virginia, or a west site in Oregon, etc.. but they do not have data center presence in all 50 states. That was a hype reel by the media.
The other mention is the armed protests. So why deploy all the NG to dc, and a few other regions, if people are supposedly going to every state and every governmental building from sea to shining sea? Why not a balanced presence across the nation? The answer is because they KNOW that there is no threat. Just like how the 6th was not violent. Not by today’s standards. The only real violence was due to trigger happy DC authorities.
Same old song and dance from the media. I’m not saying there aren’t a few extremist maniacs out there, but Trump’s supporters at the event were upwards of a million+ in numbers. If he had made a call for or incited violence, the Capitol would be pounded to sand. Instead, some paid instigators tried to rev a few impressionable morons up. I mean the select few... maybe 20 total.. who broke Windows and were loud and in the face of authorities.
Ashli Babbit may have been somewhere she shouldn’t have been, but she was not armed, and posed no threat to the men with guns. There were 20 or so cops just 8 feet behind her having casual conversation on the stairwell.
Yet besides those few people, which included Antifa members and others who were there to cause problems, you have roughly a million other people who stood proudly with flags, and sang the national anthem, etc. How the TV networks and congress are in a panic is not beyond my comprehension, because we know they are cowards.. but to expect the American people to accept the double standard, after they allowed BLM and Antifa to burn half of our nations biggest cities and riot and loot for the past year?? I don’t think so. Let’s compare video sequences. Even the most radical and “violent” from each event. Then see what we consider to be domestic terror.
The whole “Rules for the and not for me” attitude can suck a fart out of my patriotic ass. We’re either equals and we play by the same rules and judgement, or we are in conflict. I let them choose their own fate.
Beautifully put