I think it's crazy town to allow the inauguration to occur, as most of the military would then assume that Biden is now the Commander in Chief - and you can't read them all in on 'the plan' to circumvent that confusion ahead of time, because of the obvious need for OPSEC.

But for the sake of argument...

If a select number of the military leadership is briefed ahead of time, shown the actual election data, and is convinced that despite the pomp and circumstance, that Trump is and remains the Commander in Chief as the legitimate winner of the election, and that the floor show is simply the crime's victory lap, followed by a huge round up...

I guess that's possible, but it certainly seems like a lot of unnecessary risk - and to what end?

If you've got 'the goods,' not only on this election, but on elections past as we all believe, then declassify it all, and let's get this show on the road. Plus the Q drops suggesting that they had caught conspirators discussion of an assassination plot in the early morning hours after the 2016 election... It's time to show the cards.

I'm sure you all saw the Gallup polling - 17% of Democrat respondents thought the Democrats had stolen the election. That means almost 1 in 5 of the opposition, with the absence of proof laid before them, already saw enough on election night proper to know that the fix was in. (And by the way, that was 1 in 5 who didn't know better than to not answer the question honestly - the actual number of Dems who believed it was stolen is likely much higher, but they're smart enough not to say so because they're happy with the outcome.)