I like the box that this idiot has nailed himself into - it will be his coffin.
So he counterfeited the votes and thus far claims to have purchased the presidency with these stolen votes. The problem is, the entire world watched him do this. They saw votes tick backwards for Trump during live election coverage. The saw inexplicable violence and obstruction towards republican ballot counting observers. They saw the inexplicable jumps in counting graphs at a time when polls were closed, using ballots with no audit trail, no verified signatures, no creases as folded and posted ballots would have, all of the above. They saw crimes being livestreamed by the election riggers as they were committing these electoral crimes, taking a trophy of the moment as criminals are wont to do.
When the dust settled they saw the Mastriano electoral review hearing in PA, they heard from Sidney Powell, and Rudy, and Ellis. They saw the same thing in other swing states, with many hundreds of affidavits of fraud being submitted. Finally, they saw the Navarro report findings, huge amounts of crime and with a magnitude of stolen ballots that changed the purported winner to Biden, contrary to what the lying complicit press has been screaming. And speaking of complicit, they saw every request for a genuine audit being refused, they saw evidence being deleted with the bigtech socials policy changes banning any dissenting presented viewpoints, and the deplatforming of all people complaining about The Steal.
So here is Biden with this counterfeit vote in his pocket, like an idiot with a bunch of photocopied $100s. Until he tries to spend them, he cant get any value from them, but when he does the risks go up dramatically. So he lurks outside a store shuffling his feet and wanting to go in and try to spend it, but fearing to. And the world is watching this happen. And that store has razor wire, fencing and armed guards by the thousand that just turned up for some reason, looking up at the sky and whistling with their hands in their pockets.
Never before in hundreds of years has there been a crime like this. What are you gonna do Joe? Either way that box is getting nailed shut around you.
Don't forget the goal-line fumble by SCOTUS. Still not 100% sure where they fit into the scheme of things, but after their "No Standing", they have committed themselves to the mess even without making a ruling.
If, in the future, we see Texas secede for what appears to be very valid reasons, I think the critical failure that led to it was SCOTUS. Everything else just led to SCOTUS having to make a call (and not doing so).
Let's look at Camp DC and see who's stuck inside the wire. Oh, funny that.
""[SCOTUS] has made [its] decision; now let [them] enforce it!"
True, the SC thing was omission that I wish I mentioned in hindsight.
Did you see the TX response, its pretty magical.. and makes a legal case at least to dissolve their agreement to join the union since one side of this deal is not upholding their obligations under the agreement.
Perhaps law-abiding states should bond together and form a Union of states that will abide by the constitution.
A wider question is, why can a court refuse to do their job and throw a nation into chaos, allowing crime.. without consequences to the justices? Anyone else did this, there is a case to fire them or at the very least stop paying them. When the dust settles on this, I dont see much relevance for the SC going forwards.. if it exists at all.
Yeah, I saw the TX response, after picking my jaw up of the floor from reading the SCOTUS statement.
I was getting real 1861 vibes from all of it and was wondering who was going to blink first. It certainly had the feel of one of those turning points in history taking place right before us, and we were little more than passengers along for the ride.
Another one of the things I was wondering about was the effective lack of representation / ability to have a say / influence that anyone really had as it was all playing out. The veneer of "They work for us" I think was stripped away.
It is said that WWI was a family argument between cousins that cost the lives of millions. Right now, it feels that there are people who've embedded themselves into power who are playing it out without consideration for the masses being swung about by their decisions. I know, sounds kind of Marxist when you look at it that way. The proletariat shall rise again!
I agree with your viewpoint on the future for SCOTUS, but the broader question I think is what happens / what is the effect on the entire judicial branch? If SCOTUS validated their existence with Marbury vs Madison, they may have invalidated their existence with not taking on this case and, by extension, shown that judicial processes are not inviolate. The judiciary is one of those functions that exists because people allow it. If enough people feel that the judiciary aren't doing their job properly it becomes vigilantism and the judiciary are invalidated.
The whole ""[SCOTUS] has made [its] decision; now let [them] enforce it!" thing again. I might not agree with everything Andrew Jackson did or said, but he made a really good point here.
From a broader viewpoint, who else falls under the judiciary? The FBI. Now, I can't see Hoover's personal blackmail agency disappearing that easily, but I think the future will probably see more challenges at ground level against the reach and authority of the FBI (and other alphabet agencies). It probably won't go through the courts, though, as SCOTUS has just shown its hand as to the thumb on the scale.
There were some good points made about how Trump saw very few mass shootings during his first term. I worry that someone or some people are setting themselves up to repeat Ruby Ridge (yes, I know that was a debacle) once the Uniparty retake power and there is going to be the same slanders repeated via MSM.
On the SC, I think they have been one of the larger frauds of the last 4 years. Every confirmation hearing filled with so much disruption and drama - as though we were supposed to believe that so much pivoted upon the outcome. So with an unprecedented 3 placements under Trump (Gorsuch, Kav, ACB ) it still failed spectacularly. What more could have been done to get a court that was functioning? I take a dim view on people so incompetent that no matter what easy-mode task they are given, they still are an utter failure.. no one else has infinite leeway to be a bum at huge cost to the nation, and they shouldn't either.
So what can be done, can it be repaired or reformed or does it need to be thrown away? At a minimum I think it needs a clean sweep, firing each and every one of the justices. Its pretty clear that the supposed rigour of confirmations are a farce, with open liars accepted like Christine Blasey Ford, and leftist sit-ins and disruptions in the buildings and hearings being tolerated. If as an institution its going to be kept around, there has to be an investigation of would-be justices at the level done against Trump himself - full finances, all comms and records, travel movements, emails, phone records, socials etc going back decades. How many criminals and pedos do they know on a first name basis etc. A lot easier to blackmail and control the SC than any other governmental branch given the fewer people who constitute it. Though to be fair we watched an entire presidential election get stolen too with consequences also lacking (though not for much longer!) A compromised SC is small fry next to that.
Term limits, health mandates (no more ginsburgs etc) are probably nice to haves as well... if you are too ill to move or think, how can you make coherent valid rulings? And constant NSA-grade monitoring of comms and activities while a justice is serving.
I like the box that this idiot has nailed himself into - it will be his coffin.
So he counterfeited the votes and thus far claims to have purchased the presidency with these stolen votes. The problem is, the entire world watched him do this. They saw votes tick backwards for Trump during live election coverage. The saw inexplicable violence and obstruction towards republican ballot counting observers. They saw the inexplicable jumps in counting graphs at a time when polls were closed, using ballots with no audit trail, no verified signatures, no creases as folded and posted ballots would have, all of the above. They saw crimes being livestreamed by the election riggers as they were committing these electoral crimes, taking a trophy of the moment as criminals are wont to do.
When the dust settled they saw the Mastriano electoral review hearing in PA, they heard from Sidney Powell, and Rudy, and Ellis. They saw the same thing in other swing states, with many hundreds of affidavits of fraud being submitted. Finally, they saw the Navarro report findings, huge amounts of crime and with a magnitude of stolen ballots that changed the purported winner to Biden, contrary to what the lying complicit press has been screaming. And speaking of complicit, they saw every request for a genuine audit being refused, they saw evidence being deleted with the bigtech socials policy changes banning any dissenting presented viewpoints, and the deplatforming of all people complaining about The Steal.
So here is Biden with this counterfeit vote in his pocket, like an idiot with a bunch of photocopied $100s. Until he tries to spend them, he cant get any value from them, but when he does the risks go up dramatically. So he lurks outside a store shuffling his feet and wanting to go in and try to spend it, but fearing to. And the world is watching this happen. And that store has razor wire, fencing and armed guards by the thousand that just turned up for some reason, looking up at the sky and whistling with their hands in their pockets.
Never before in hundreds of years has there been a crime like this. What are you gonna do Joe? Either way that box is getting nailed shut around you.
Don't forget the goal-line fumble by SCOTUS. Still not 100% sure where they fit into the scheme of things, but after their "No Standing", they have committed themselves to the mess even without making a ruling.
If, in the future, we see Texas secede for what appears to be very valid reasons, I think the critical failure that led to it was SCOTUS. Everything else just led to SCOTUS having to make a call (and not doing so).
Let's look at Camp DC and see who's stuck inside the wire. Oh, funny that.
""[SCOTUS] has made [its] decision; now let [them] enforce it!"
True, the SC thing was omission that I wish I mentioned in hindsight.
Did you see the TX response, its pretty magical.. and makes a legal case at least to dissolve their agreement to join the union since one side of this deal is not upholding their obligations under the agreement.
https://thedonald.win/p/11R4JGC5I0/texas-gop-perhaps-lawabiding-sta/c/
A wider question is, why can a court refuse to do their job and throw a nation into chaos, allowing crime.. without consequences to the justices? Anyone else did this, there is a case to fire them or at the very least stop paying them. When the dust settles on this, I dont see much relevance for the SC going forwards.. if it exists at all.
Yeah, I saw the TX response, after picking my jaw up of the floor from reading the SCOTUS statement.
I was getting real 1861 vibes from all of it and was wondering who was going to blink first. It certainly had the feel of one of those turning points in history taking place right before us, and we were little more than passengers along for the ride.
Another one of the things I was wondering about was the effective lack of representation / ability to have a say / influence that anyone really had as it was all playing out. The veneer of "They work for us" I think was stripped away.
It is said that WWI was a family argument between cousins that cost the lives of millions. Right now, it feels that there are people who've embedded themselves into power who are playing it out without consideration for the masses being swung about by their decisions. I know, sounds kind of Marxist when you look at it that way. The proletariat shall rise again!
I agree with your viewpoint on the future for SCOTUS, but the broader question I think is what happens / what is the effect on the entire judicial branch? If SCOTUS validated their existence with Marbury vs Madison, they may have invalidated their existence with not taking on this case and, by extension, shown that judicial processes are not inviolate. The judiciary is one of those functions that exists because people allow it. If enough people feel that the judiciary aren't doing their job properly it becomes vigilantism and the judiciary are invalidated.
The whole ""[SCOTUS] has made [its] decision; now let [them] enforce it!" thing again. I might not agree with everything Andrew Jackson did or said, but he made a really good point here.
From a broader viewpoint, who else falls under the judiciary? The FBI. Now, I can't see Hoover's personal blackmail agency disappearing that easily, but I think the future will probably see more challenges at ground level against the reach and authority of the FBI (and other alphabet agencies). It probably won't go through the courts, though, as SCOTUS has just shown its hand as to the thumb on the scale.
There were some good points made about how Trump saw very few mass shootings during his first term. I worry that someone or some people are setting themselves up to repeat Ruby Ridge (yes, I know that was a debacle) once the Uniparty retake power and there is going to be the same slanders repeated via MSM.
Thanks for the reply.
On the SC, I think they have been one of the larger frauds of the last 4 years. Every confirmation hearing filled with so much disruption and drama - as though we were supposed to believe that so much pivoted upon the outcome. So with an unprecedented 3 placements under Trump (Gorsuch, Kav, ACB ) it still failed spectacularly. What more could have been done to get a court that was functioning? I take a dim view on people so incompetent that no matter what easy-mode task they are given, they still are an utter failure.. no one else has infinite leeway to be a bum at huge cost to the nation, and they shouldn't either.
So what can be done, can it be repaired or reformed or does it need to be thrown away? At a minimum I think it needs a clean sweep, firing each and every one of the justices. Its pretty clear that the supposed rigour of confirmations are a farce, with open liars accepted like Christine Blasey Ford, and leftist sit-ins and disruptions in the buildings and hearings being tolerated. If as an institution its going to be kept around, there has to be an investigation of would-be justices at the level done against Trump himself - full finances, all comms and records, travel movements, emails, phone records, socials etc going back decades. How many criminals and pedos do they know on a first name basis etc. A lot easier to blackmail and control the SC than any other governmental branch given the fewer people who constitute it. Though to be fair we watched an entire presidential election get stolen too with consequences also lacking (though not for much longer!) A compromised SC is small fry next to that.
Term limits, health mandates (no more ginsburgs etc) are probably nice to haves as well... if you are too ill to move or think, how can you make coherent valid rulings? And constant NSA-grade monitoring of comms and activities while a justice is serving.