1st, please don't ban me. I think you guys have a great community and I enjoy reading your stuff. That said, I've seen a lot of post about how Q "predicted" a strike on an Iranian facility in Syria. The actual prediction is "Iran is next."

Lets be real clear here. At no point did Q specifically predict the strike. Q instead predicted some form of hostility towards Iran.

For example, if instead of the facility, a bomb where dropped on a bunch of Iranian backed jihadis, that would also count as being within the scope of "Iran is Next." Here is a question, what if he wasn't predicting a single strike but a larger strategic movement focusing on Iran?

All forms of hostility would fit into "Iran is Next." There is simply no way of knowing from three words, what exactly Q meant. So is "Iran is Next" a good prediction?

No. Considering the widespread hostility the U.S. has had with Iran, it was only a matter of time before something along those lines happened.

Anyways, let me know if I should delete this post. Thanks for reading.