1st, please don't ban me. I think you guys have a great community and I enjoy reading your stuff. That said, I've seen a lot of post about how Q "predicted" a strike on an Iranian facility in Syria. The actual prediction is "Iran is next."
Lets be real clear here. At no point did Q specifically predict the strike. Q instead predicted some form of hostility towards Iran.
For example, if instead of the facility, a bomb where dropped on a bunch of Iranian backed jihadis, that would also count as being within the scope of "Iran is Next." Here is a question, what if he wasn't predicting a single strike but a larger strategic movement focusing on Iran?
All forms of hostility would fit into "Iran is Next." There is simply no way of knowing from three words, what exactly Q meant. So is "Iran is Next" a good prediction?
No. Considering the widespread hostility the U.S. has had with Iran, it was only a matter of time before something along those lines happened.
Anyways, let me know if I should delete this post. Thanks for reading.
Q 1254. Apr 24 2018 "bigger problems than ever before"
Trump Speech May 8 2018 "bigger problems than it has ever had before"
FUTURE PROVES PAST
This post does not question the validity of Q. Nor does it make a statement about Q's predictive value, including Q 1254.
This post questions the use of a specific Q post for its predictive value.
Also, as a general matter, I agree that outcomes are a good measuring stick for predictions. Or "future proves past."
There is a reason Q started this movement w the chans. You dont think like a autist. You can do what normies should do. Lurk ,listen and learn . Dont try to be an like an Autist unless you do those things for some time. IT AINT EASY BEING GREEN???⚖?
Quantum computing is new too many. "future proves past" is language not recognized by most. However, our military is very familiar with such technology and language.