WHAT'S THIS? COULD IT BE MORE WINNING?
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (76)
sorted by:
Do we need a trial so our side can present election fraud evidence? Not sure how it works.
A lot of people here seem to think so. If you think that, you're not paying attention.
There is no way the dems would allow that evidence to be presented.
How exactly would that play out? But in a trial the defense gets the opportunity to argue their side and explain and use evidence to prove explanations.
So how would dems not allow evidence to be presented? By raising an objection and the judge says okay then shut up no evidence like that allowed NEXT'
The “judge” is a dem senator. So, yeah, probably something like that
Damn. I need to stop forgetting that they can get away with anything. That really sucks though fuck them. Thanks for the reply.
To the downvoters, sorry I asked a question, didn't fully understand yet!
They say the sham peach mints hearing will start on the 8th, smells like a good day to go hunt some pedos....
That's what I was thinking too (i.e. dems not allowing it to be presented). What I'm hoping for is that he has an ace up his sleeve proving beyond any doubt that piglosi or someone organized the costumed antifatards who actually did the naughty things. I believe this to be the most likely scenario since the actual stated basis for the peach mints is that he directly incited the capital tour (I refuse to call that shit a riot). So it would make sense that if he has a play to make it's gotta be in regards to that specific accusation.
Also, I have a sneaking suspicion that buffalo horn guy might have a big role to play in this.