Point 1, its true that being assigned a special prosecutor the only way such prosecutor can be dismissed is by a direct order from a sitting AG. No other way.
Point 2, and we've seen it already before. Durham report does not go directly to the public consumption, to us, the people, it goes to the sitting AG. And nowhere else. And it is up to the sitting AG to then provide a "general overview" of what AG thinks the report says (and not what the report could actually say). It is also up to the sitting AG and DoInjustice to either act on the report and its findings, or simply sit on them and sweep them under the rug. Horowitz report came out, can you recall anyone paying the price?
Don't forget that even though Mueller report indicated they found absolutely no factual data to prove Russia collusion, Mueller then STILL said to the Senate that he believes there was one. And paid no price for the open lie to the Senate under oath.
I want to believe what your Canadian guy says, but his analysis does not really align with how things really work. And as we've seen them work under Trump, with this abomination now in the WH all bets are way off, including Durham.
Its either something happens by March 4, or all of this talk of "Durham justice" will be just that, talk. Hunter and his uncle are now OPENLY SELLING OFF access and deals.
Like I said, its a nice and "convincing" read. I'm simply pointing out my own perception and analysis. We all thought at the time that Barr stabbed Trump in the back by naming Durham a "special" investigator, but that now seems a move by Trump himself to at least have Durham finish the report. What remains to be seen is what happens when that happens. As much as I am hopeful that we'll see real names and actions, I am basing my read on the situation on the Horowitz report, which already named names, but then was swept under the rug, quickly. I am a realist, and as much as we all have hopes and beliefs, reality is a bitch sometimes.
2 issues with the above analysis.
Point 1, its true that being assigned a special prosecutor the only way such prosecutor can be dismissed is by a direct order from a sitting AG. No other way.
Point 2, and we've seen it already before. Durham report does not go directly to the public consumption, to us, the people, it goes to the sitting AG. And nowhere else. And it is up to the sitting AG to then provide a "general overview" of what AG thinks the report says (and not what the report could actually say). It is also up to the sitting AG and DoInjustice to either act on the report and its findings, or simply sit on them and sweep them under the rug. Horowitz report came out, can you recall anyone paying the price?
Don't forget that even though Mueller report indicated they found absolutely no factual data to prove Russia collusion, Mueller then STILL said to the Senate that he believes there was one. And paid no price for the open lie to the Senate under oath.
I want to believe what your Canadian guy says, but his analysis does not really align with how things really work. And as we've seen them work under Trump, with this abomination now in the WH all bets are way off, including Durham.
Its either something happens by March 4, or all of this talk of "Durham justice" will be just that, talk. Hunter and his uncle are now OPENLY SELLING OFF access and deals.
Like I said, its a nice and "convincing" read. I'm simply pointing out my own perception and analysis. We all thought at the time that Barr stabbed Trump in the back by naming Durham a "special" investigator, but that now seems a move by Trump himself to at least have Durham finish the report. What remains to be seen is what happens when that happens. As much as I am hopeful that we'll see real names and actions, I am basing my read on the situation on the Horowitz report, which already named names, but then was swept under the rug, quickly. I am a realist, and as much as we all have hopes and beliefs, reality is a bitch sometimes.