The way I see it, anytime anything actually makes it out into wide circulation, it is always intentional at this point. If we weren't meant to know that aoc lied, the Crowder video on it, for example, would have been taken down. Maybe even tim "The Milquetoast Faggot" pool's video too. Any voices publicly explaining how she lied would have been silenced. Everything we have seen in the past month shows us very clearly that they can and will do this when they want to. This was always meant to be part of the narrative. The only question is, who owns the narrative at this point?

If it's a white hat operation, the advantage of letting it out is obvious: it serves to wake some people up. Probably not many, as the people who already support her aren't likely to change their minds, no matter how big of a piece of garbage she is shown to be.

Which leads me to believe that the AOC thing was not a white hat operation.

So if it was allowed to propagate by the deep state, what is the advantage for them? Well, I would say it is solidifying their base and forcing people to go all in if they intend to stick with the leftist agenda. Measuring the public response to such things is a good way of counting heads. It feels to me as if they are measuring things up to see if they have the enough diehard support for whatever their next move is.

And to tie all of this back in to the Time article, I believe the same ideas would apply there as well. The Time article, to me, represents the DS throwing their cards on the table. I believe it was prompted by the Lindell video. He basically called and now it's time for the DS to show their hand. The fact that he hyped up his video prior to release instead of stealth dropping it tells me that white hats wanted the DS to make a move to get in front of it, which they did, which is why the Time article came out first. He/our guys did not have to give them advance notice that the video was coming out, remember that.

The Time article was surely a DS move, but one made out of desperation. The line is clearly drawn now and they have read the room: If most of the population still defends the takeover of our country after reading the Time admission of guilt/justification, they were never going to be swayed, no matter what evidence our side brings out. If this is the sense they get from it, I expect they will still proceed with the mask still semi-on (i.e. they will continue the takeover via legislation with the base they have and people on the fence will do nothing). But if the Lindell video gains greater traction/acceptance than the Time article, I believe the DS will make their big move due to them feeling things slipping away. They will attempt an emotional takeover of the people still on the fence, forego a legislative takeover and go for all the marbles in one big move.

What's the big move? My guess is a FF at the Super Bowl, but what do I know?