Is it possible they already have Hitlery in custody? Q post 148 and a tweet from today - The Great Awakening

Is it possible they already have Hitlery in custody? Q post 148 and a tweet from today (media.greatawakening.win) Q-incidence!

posted 3 years ago by Internet_hugs (context) 3 years ago by Internet_hugs +516 / -3

142 comments download

142 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (142)

sorted by:

▲ 19 ▼

– ApplesOrangesLemons 19 points 3 years ago +20 / -1

Wow... I've been checking Hillary's account to see if anything was off and last weird message was about dogs are back and then a where can I run link. But that's awesome you spotted this. I did notice aomar responding to Hillary twice with an encoded message about contacting someone.

Edit: screenshot of the weird dog comms:

https://i.ibb.co/ysHgrT7/Screenshot-20210206-200421.png

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– formerdemfortrump 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

What is the significance of the guy replying with “Islam call” YouTube link ?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– ApplesOrangesLemons 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Possible Hillary comms asking for help. Dogs are back. Where can I run? Aomar responds with cryptic video links with 2nd one implying to call yusuf estes. He is associated with a Muslim center in NYC. Also she replies a second time in one of Hilary's later tweets.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– formerdemfortrump 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Wow thank you

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q