One is a little faggot, the other one is autistic and suffers from Fetal alcohol syndrome. And it's sad to say, but they are sending their best. Fortunately for them, they will never have to work by the sweat of their brow to find out how difficult life can already be, without the implementation of their idiotic ideology and ideas. Green energy is literally impossible, and the amount of batteries they would need to make to run things on solar or wind exclusively would create more toxic waste and pollution than burning straight coal for a thousand years. You also can't really recycle solar panels, and the wind turbines they just cut into pieces and bury. Sounds very green, if you actually study the process from beginning to end.
Nuclear is the way to go, and they have new reactor designs that can reuse spent fuel from the older reactors. And the waste that they produce is not usable in nuclear weapons. And they can't melt down and explode like Chernobyl. But we haven't built a single one in the United States, and the eco warrior types hate nuclear energy. It is safe, produces almost no pollution, and is scalable so you can build them any size, anywhere. Their output for their size is the best available too, so the environmental impact is minimal. But they dont care about practicality, they care about sounding trendy and virtue signaling. Look up how many birds are killed by wind turbines every year. It's a lot.
One is a little faggot, the other one is autistic and suffers from Fetal alcohol syndrome. And it's sad to say, but they are sending their best. Fortunately for them, they will never have to work by the sweat of their brow to find out how difficult life can already be, without the implementation of their idiotic ideology and ideas. Green energy is literally impossible, and the amount of batteries they would need to make to run things on solar or wind exclusively would create more toxic waste and pollution than burning straight coal for a thousand years. You also can't really recycle solar panels, and the wind turbines they just cut into pieces and bury. Sounds very green, if you actually study the process from beginning to end.
On a per kWh generated basis, nuclear power causes the fewest deaths.
Nuclear is the way to go, and they have new reactor designs that can reuse spent fuel from the older reactors. And the waste that they produce is not usable in nuclear weapons. And they can't melt down and explode like Chernobyl. But we haven't built a single one in the United States, and the eco warrior types hate nuclear energy. It is safe, produces almost no pollution, and is scalable so you can build them any size, anywhere. Their output for their size is the best available too, so the environmental impact is minimal. But they dont care about practicality, they care about sounding trendy and virtue signaling. Look up how many birds are killed by wind turbines every year. It's a lot.
Exactly, 4th generation pebble bed reactors are super promising and don't have many of the negatives traditional fission reactors.