Why do they continue to refer to it as a coup? The coup was the election fraud in my mind and the military take over was the responsibility of the military to defeat the coup. If we are to use Myanmar as a template, then a military remedy here would be labeled the same...a coup.
My husband and I were just arguing about this. I said the military was acting for the good of the people and he claimed the coup was done by the military to prevent a legal democratic election...
Why do they continue to refer to it as a coup? The coup was the election fraud in my mind and the military take over was the responsibility of the military to defeat the coup. If we are to use Myanmar as a template, then a military remedy here would be labeled the same...a coup.
To spin the narrative. They have to make the Myanmar military look bad so that way it will change people’s mind here and make our military look bad
My husband and I were just arguing about this. I said the military was acting for the good of the people and he claimed the coup was done by the military to prevent a legal democratic election...
Then ask your husband why the military said they are going to hold another election?