A brief introduction to the feminine shaming tactics on social media."GSRRM"
(propertarianinstitute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (3)
sorted by:
GSRRM is Gossiping, Shaming, Rallying, Reputation destruction and Moralizing. You'll find bots and shills and people who have succumbed to feminine [not explicitly female] argumentative tactics with you often enough, the intended effect is to emotionally wear you down, distract you, isolate you and ultimately threaten you with consequences unless you give in. The link above will help you see how it works and call it out for what it is. Just because it is feminine doesn't mean it's the sole domain of women, online is inherently feminine because there is very little implied risk of violence as in two men conversing at a bar to one another. Polite society rules are ran on implied violence and this is true whether it's tax collectors, traffic lights, or public order. Many people who are well intentioned but lack an understanding on how these tactics work will wither and fade under such assaults because they simply don't recognize them for what they are - which is the first step required in responding to it.
Gossiping is simple enough, everyone knows what that is.
Shaming takes many forms and usually comes with the typical NPC words like:
Rallying is the actual reach for or implied reach [fake] consensus against you, this comes usually like this:
This one is powerful, we all imagine the worst for the most part in terms of consequential actions and realizing that a fictitious minority of gobshites on twitter doesn't represent anything like a majority of thought isn't easy. When this happens just say something like
Reputation destruction is basically trying to get you fired at work for your allegedly extremist views.
Moralizing is simple enough and comes like:
When people do this call them a retarded n-word faggot or agree and amplify. AOC talking about the world ending in 12 years in this case would be responded to by saying:
Whilst obviously not every interaction with someone is them consciously or otherwise trying to steer you into the ground you need to know that there's a fuck ton of astro-turfing bots on every site where opinions form, as gregarious creatures we form our own opinions in context, and context is shaped heavily by "society" around us.If you let people shape the microcosm of "society" around you they will control the narrative of what you're saying and you will lose. If you're painted as an angry man, woman beater, racist or whatever other character assassination they try, then no one will care about what it was you said. NPCs are real, they don't deal in facts, they deal in narratives. Calling people out for trying the above things on you will be an arrow in your quiver hopefully. Whether right or wrong responding to the above attempts on you with simply:
...punches a lot harder than you might expect. It conveys you know the game they're playing and don't feel the need to respond with a thesis which is suggestive of confidence, this has the effect of a pressure flip to them and now they're the one isolated feeling like people are looking at and gossiping about them. Cheers.
Case in point.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRGvEvGL/x/c/4Dx4LF23Fhd
Great break down