If this sounds doomerish that is not my intention. I am trying to get a feel for what our collected thoughts are about what comes next.
I truly hope that Americans generally, and Trump supporters specifically, are not going to roll over and just whimper as the left ass-fucks us without lube.
Do we think that the military is going to step in and declair the election a fraud and order a "do-over" under military supervision? Or, in the alternative remove the imposter from power and install the rightful winner of the election?
Another option is for one or more states to declare themselves independent of the former US, and seize military and equipment in preparation for potential conflict.
A third option is to move as quickly as possible to a convention of the states modifying the constitution and declare Biden as a fraud.
Sell me some hopeium, I can't take believing that we are all going to accept this theft for 4 years.
I'd think mostly what jcab93 thinks and then maybe time to implement EBS and/or military's GIANT VOICE (per trump's tweet and allegedly the military's high octane version of ebs) to make sure the public sees and hears the defense's case including hopefully the cyber attack details delivered by Mary Fanning on mypillow's video that should shock the world and make any vote against trump a clear act of treason.
but if that doesn't happen than hopefully this same data gets presented in supreme court on 19th or soon thereafter and that begins the shakeup to prevent the need for OVERT military intervention (i say overt because im pretty sure there's already intervention or at least on the ready on standby)
I hope they don't put Mary Fanning's attack details up as fact. That would be worse than submitting a Slate or Buzzfeed article as fact.
Maybe someone with some actual forensics or incident response skill should present truthful data- it took me about 5 seconds to debunk the Kaspersky link and another minute or so to toss more than half of the China data.
ok so enlighten me on how you debunked it?
and of course if it's presented it needs to be by the military or whatever credible source Mary created her report from, not just a regurgitation of her story unless she has a more detailed version including sourcing or other incontrovertible evidence
The Kaspersky IP is just one of their pieces of infrastructure that scours the Interwebs for running webservers in an attempt to categorize websites for their web filtering component. Its behavior is fairly well known, you can find some details via DDG/Google and it's in their product documentation.
The vast majority of the IPs registered to Alibaba / Baidu are 'leased' by Amazon Web Services, since Amazon was not permitted to build its own standalone cloud infra in CN.
Some of those IPs resolve to Dominion and Scytl DNS A records, along with a number of AWS addresses in the EU and US. That would be in line with an app deployed in AWS, with geographic redundancy (advertised out of multiple AZs).
Not saying it's right, or wise, but I am saying it's not indicative of an attack by itself. All those tables show is an IP lookup, as geographically mapped by MaxMind. It's an indicator that raises an eyebrow in the course of investigation, but not 'admissible in court' smoking gun stuff.
Source: It's what I did for the DoD for more than 10 years.
thank you. much of this stuff you have expertise on is Chinese to me. do you think there's a possibility that there's smoking gun material behind the Mary Fanning report or believe the doubt you have will always exist in that report without much chance of elucidating the data ?