Update: THE DISTANCE OF THE FIBERS, not size. Q has taught us not to listen to MSM but to educate ourselves. Once we all understand the size of a virus verses the distance of the fibers of the mask? We can all look at these people for who they are, and know they are lying to us to harm our way of life. I have learned that the size of a virus is so tiny, a mask is absolutely silly. Anyone who has gone through medical school should know this. Let's share the knowledge. Knowledge is power against evil. https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/cells/viruses/v/virus-structure-and-classification
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
A good basic analogy I've learned as a comparison model is that a bacteria, that is 100x the size of a virus, would be like a golf ball being thrown at a chain-link fence (representing an N95 mask). It can make it through, but there's a good change it will not, thus capturing the bacteria inside. A virus being 100x smaller, would be like throwing sand through a chain-link fence. The tiny percentage (i.e. .01%) that is blocked by the fence, is so irrelevant in the entire scope, that the fence serves as no boundary, whatsoever. And so it is, with capturing bacteria inside a mask incubator, you are potentially growing harmful bacteria, while freely emitting the "virus" into the atmosphere.
Got this from a Molecular Biologist, supported by other evidence, like this video. If I am incorrect, please, please, correct me = )
LOVE THIS SO MUCH - this ties into FAUCI's paper about the first punch was the virus and the final blow was the bacteria from wearing the mask.