Why are you talking about me like you're not responding to my comment?
I don't think either of those things are impossible and that is an outlandish attempt at a strawman.
I'm saying that not everytime 17 arises in normal life is attributable to Q sending a wink. In fact almost every example I've ever seen is completely nonsensical with even the slightest but of scrutiny applied (assuming the scrutinizer is capable of intellectual honesty.)
That's fair, but I'd say you're making a mistake. It isn't that I don't support the Q movement, i think it is a movement we sorely need in this world of lies. However, I'm not necessarily impressed with the direction the community is headed. Grounded realism and being able to scrutinize conjecture are fundamental to learning the truth.
I see almost none of that in this community (currently) and as a result we're running away and entering into deluded levels of misinformation just as bad the MSM.
I would love to be able to continue working towards improving this community by bringing things back to reality and focused on the truth, but I understood it's a tough pill to swallow.
To be fair I'm just some nobody to you, but I'm actually a "successful" (entirely self appointed lol) researcher. I solved the entire Seth Rich case from top to bottom and had a book set to be published by Dan Bonginos publisher until Biden won and they got cold feet.
https://www.kobo.com/us/en/ebook/his-name-was-seth-rich
Maybe I can do some kind of post explaining my approach to research and investigation in a constructive way. Thanks for reaching out and no hard feelings either way.
It took about 30 seconds.
Why are you talking about me like you're not responding to my comment?
I don't think either of those things are impossible and that is an outlandish attempt at a strawman.
I'm saying that not everytime 17 arises in normal life is attributable to Q sending a wink. In fact almost every example I've ever seen is completely nonsensical with even the slightest but of scrutiny applied (assuming the scrutinizer is capable of intellectual honesty.)
That's fair, but I'd say you're making a mistake. It isn't that I don't support the Q movement, i think it is a movement we sorely need in this world of lies. However, I'm not necessarily impressed with the direction the community is headed. Grounded realism and being able to scrutinize conjecture are fundamental to learning the truth. I see almost none of that in this community (currently) and as a result we're running away and entering into deluded levels of misinformation just as bad the MSM. I would love to be able to continue working towards improving this community by bringing things back to reality and focused on the truth, but I understood it's a tough pill to swallow. To be fair I'm just some nobody to you, but I'm actually a "successful" (entirely self appointed lol) researcher. I solved the entire Seth Rich case from top to bottom and had a book set to be published by Dan Bonginos publisher until Biden won and they got cold feet. https://www.kobo.com/us/en/ebook/his-name-was-seth-rich Maybe I can do some kind of post explaining my approach to research and investigation in a constructive way. Thanks for reaching out and no hard feelings either way.