I'm struggling to understand the logic of those that claim the current people 'commonly known as' (eg) Biden, Clinton, etc are in fact actors / clones / body-doubles. The gist of what I read is generally that the 'originals' have been either killed or locked up due to their crimes. In order to avoid public panic, an actor or clone is standing in for them. Is that the general consensus ?
So my questions are - who is making this happen? I would guess that it is the Military that is doing the 'locking up' or 'killing' of the originals, and thus, I imagine, it's the Military that is also arranging for the actors / clones to take their place? But if the Military has the (extremely far-reaching) power to achieve that, then why are these actors / clones continuing to behave just like the people they are replacing? Why not have 'fake Biden' simply implement Trump's agenda? Why allow 'Fake Biden' to sign a shit-ton of EOs on day 1 of his presidency? If he's an actor then surely he's 'our guy'? Similarly, why not have 'fake Hillary' come out and say 'I was a bad girl I confess'? Why not have 'Fake Tom Hanks' profess a new life committed to God?
a theory for say Biden would be that at some point a good guy military/cia/nsa, etc approaches Biden and shows him that they have conclusive evidence of crimes he's committed that could easily have him found guilty and shot via military tribunal so in exchange for him not being shot and being allowed to live (in gitmo likely under this theory), he agrees to play along with the white hats plan or alternatively he and possibly even those close to him allow an actor to play the part. beyond that you can speculate yourself as to how they'd want him or his stand-in to behave