https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Adrenochrome
I wondered what would happen when all of these people are left without their drug of choice. Still searching for the answer. Lots of info in link.
Adrenochrome may cause irritability, apathy, visual and auditory hallucinations, acute schizophrenia, tachycardia, loss of concentration, paranoia, ambivalence, alterations in perception and estimation of time, difficulty in concentrating, relaxation, euphoria, giggling etc.
For some information, can you provide the first piece of evidence other than a novel, a work of fiction of anyone consuming adrenochrome extracted from human tissue or blood?
How about naming one Q drop to support it, since this is a Q forum?
Can you provide the first piece of evidence that it's even possible to isolate more than micrograms if that from these sources?
Of course these people are evil, torture kids, and some are even cannibals, don't change the subject, the fact that you have no evidence on the above does not mean I support the criminals or deny their REAL crimes. That's a favorite attempted counter-attack of those who have no evidence on their adrenochrome claim when they get called on it. I trust you won't try that?
First piece of evidence? Just one? Or is that unnecessary to you?
Second, how do you argue they could be "left without their drug of choice" when it's easily synthesized and is pretty cheap to buy pure from multiple sources due to that fact?
Information rather than evidence-free magical thinking would be good.
And seriously, citing Wikipedia for anything, let alone the Talk section??
there is tons of information out there, I suggest you get out there and do the research - if you are looking for me to show you sites that 'need to be taken down' because 'we can't have the truth out there?' not going to be me
In other words, you have not the first piece of evidence, other than a novel and people using the same novel as their "evidence."
D.U.M.B. Deep Underground Military Base - they must be 'ficticious' = huh
Clearly you like to change the subject when you have no evidence.
You do realize you are asking OP to provide you with scientific evidence that would be illegal and unethical to publish?
You're not going to find a scientific paper where the scientist admitted to severely torturing a child in order to obtain high levels of adrenochrome.
The reason they state only small doses can be obtained is because they didn't put the subject under high enough stress levels for ethical reasons.
I suspect the reason they use children is because children are more easily scared, therefore producing more adrenaline.
As far as synthetic adrenochrome, go ask a heroine addict which is better heroine or methadone.
In other words you have no evidence, and don't consider evidence at all necessary to promoting a claim.
And on your idea that a heroin/methadone analogy could prove any point, you appear unaware that they are different drugs with different chemical structure and which act differently for that reason, so the analogy is false.
Try naming a drug that addicts go into withdrawal if they can only get the pure.
You can't of course.
It is evidence-free to claim that anyone goes into adrenochrome withdrawal, and given that adrenochrome is readily available pure, is one of the weakest evidence-free distractions (disinfo) ever put out.
So you have evidence of these evil people committing cannibalism?
Prove it.
I've asked you for one piece of evidence for the adrenochrome claims and you have none.
You ask for one piece of evidence for cannibalism by elites? As if you really do have evidence on adrenochrome claims but are holding out till you get that?
Q drop #3917. I trust that on this board, Q counts as evidence. Of course other examples can be found as well, but one is all I asked of you and the OP.
Now will you provide one piece of evidence (as opposed to baseless assertions or a novel) for adrenochrome withdrawal and/or consumption of adrenochrome extracted from human blood or flesh, or that it is even possible to do with yield beyond micrograms? I won't waste time with you further until you do, but of course you won't as you can't, there is none. Frankly I see your response as trolling and hypocritical. Goodbye.
Methadone is NOT heroin; it is a substitute that is not claimed to be 'the same'. It's designed to give you 'some' of the feelings of heroin while also allowing you to gradually get off of the habit. Synthetic adrenochrome is, however, pure. Synthetic, in this case, simply means synthesized in a lab.
As the other poster said, there's absolutely no evidence to support the fantasy that there is a unique quality of 'adrenochrome' extracted from children. The fact that person 'a' said something, person 'b' referred to 'a' as a source, and person 'c' then says 'I've seen plenty of "Evidence" (from a and b) does not constitute rational scientific examination.