They Aren't Fact Checkers People; They're 2020's Version Of Orewell's Ministry Of Truth From The Novel 1984
Ask PolitiFact: Did Capitol Police let mob of Trump supporters in?
We have not seen evidence that Capitol Police granted rioters access to the building or that they were “in on” the breach, as some posts claim.
Footage that appeared to show some officers allowing rioters past barricades was misrepresented online. The journalist who shot the video said the officers backed off the barricade because they were “completely outnumbered.”
Other videos taken at different entrances back that up, and show rioters quickly overwhelming police barricades and eventually forcing officers to retreat.
35 Capitol Police Officers Under Investigation in Connection With Riot
Office of Professional Responsibility investigating 35 officers.
Six of those officers have already been suspended (with pay).
Acting Chief Yogananda Pittman has directed that any member of her department whose behavior is not in keeping with the Department's Rules of Conduct will face appropriate discipline.
What I'm saying is that they jumped at the chance to declare the capitol police's involvement in the riot as false.
They did not wait for evidence.
There was no reason for them to fact check it without any contradictory evidence but they did.
They called a claim false because they couldn't prove the claim; not because there was any evidence whatsoever to dispute said claim.
In fact, they claim there is no evidence that police removed barriers and allowed rioters to enter at a time when there were multiple videos of exactly that all over the internet.
They ignored supporting evidence. Now we know that 35 officers are being investigated BECAUSE of there involvement in the capitol riots.
They Aren't Fact Checkers People; They're 2020's Version Of Orewell's Ministry Of Truth From The Novel 1984
Ask PolitiFact: Did Capitol Police let mob of Trump supporters in?
We have not seen evidence that Capitol Police granted rioters access to the building or that they were “in on” the breach, as some posts claim.
Footage that appeared to show some officers allowing rioters past barricades was misrepresented online. The journalist who shot the video said the officers backed off the barricade because they were “completely outnumbered.”
Other videos taken at different entrances back that up, and show rioters quickly overwhelming police barricades and eventually forcing officers to retreat.
https://www.politifact.com/article/2021/jan/07/ask-politifact-did-capitol-police-let-mob-trump-su/
35 Capitol Police Officers Under Investigation in Connection With Riot
Office of Professional Responsibility investigating 35 officers.
Six of those officers have already been suspended (with pay).
Acting Chief Yogananda Pittman has directed that any member of her department whose behavior is not in keeping with the Department's Rules of Conduct will face appropriate discipline.
https://www.newsweek.com/35-capitol-police-officers-under-investigation-connection-riot-1570376
What are you trying to say? That because 35 are under investigation, Politifact was wrong about them letting the protesters in?
What I'm saying is that they jumped at the chance to declare the capitol police's involvement in the riot as false.
They did not wait for evidence.
There was no reason for them to fact check it without any contradictory evidence but they did.
They called a claim false because they couldn't prove the claim; not because there was any evidence whatsoever to dispute said claim.
In fact, they claim there is no evidence that police removed barriers and allowed rioters to enter at a time when there were multiple videos of exactly that all over the internet.
They ignored supporting evidence. Now we know that 35 officers are being investigated BECAUSE of there involvement in the capitol riots.
The fact checkers lied is what I'm saying.
I don't see the word "false" anywhere in the article you linked to.
Do you work for Snopes or Politifact?