The latest article, by the same author on the site, now says only 1/3 refusing it. I wonder what happened there. Was 75% too encouraging, and the Pentagon changed the story? Or were "incentives" applied, maybe?
Feb 28 2021 "Pentagon reports a third of US troops declining Wuhan coronavirus vaccine" https://archive.vn/PSAsB
That is quite the change in numbers. It is hard to believe any infotainment these days. We are but humble collectors of lies. I wonder if we will ever know what has truly transpired. Praying every day for God’s will and protection.
In my movie, they changed the report because people were throwing a fit. “How could the military not get vaccinated when everyone has to get vaccinated for us to be safe?!” Fear and panic. I think it’s why operation warp speed exists. The public demands something, the optics are presented to appease them. The optics are often shallow (think $2000 stimulus) regardless of the side they come from. In my movie the Pentagon and Trump and protecting the soldiers from the virus and purging the ranks without a politics test required.
Another option is 75% of what? A1/3 of what? Maybe they define it differently in a way that allows them to report the numbers differently. Numbers are sooo manipulated. Like cases over sick, or efficacy. How the number is determined is half of the lie sometimes.
There's an article there saying the Pfizer fact sheet is different for the UK, and says pregnant women shouldn't take the shot. The US one doesn't have that warning.
The more recent one mentions animal studies, and says no evidence of harm to fetus, etc was found. Still says "should only be considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks".
The FDA fact sheet is already in the end section of the links pages. It mentions an experiment on rats, says data is not sufficient to "inform" risks. Section 11.1.
I ran into something very similar.
March 4 2021: Deaths, miscarriages etc, “Whistleblower Reveals Many Pregnancy Complications following Experimental COVID Injections – “Vaccine Leaving a Trail of Devastated Mothers” https://archive.vn/spebS
Cdc gets Royalties?
They do a good job of composing a bunch of links into the article.
That’s the first I’ve heard them mention the animal studies. Maybe it’s been brought up enough they had to address it (Though providing nothing.)
we might see a conflict between sides coming to a head. Praying that will see the end of this chaos and not just the destruction of dissension.
I was able to update the death page and get your new pdf posted on the pastlink. (loosing the list on screen articles in the process) I will count any successful changes and move into a holding pattern.
Having the toughest time getting this to post today. Idk if it's starlink beta, my social score or the devils in the digispace but atm the best I got is this:
I was able to get the links to post there. I've been at this all day and I have to go to bed. Anyone who can take all this info and make a post for us is more than welcome. Please share the post here with us.
I do see a lot of scoffers to the natural news site, more on sources and such. Not that infotainment news is better. Not that scoffers should always be regarded.
Pfizer’s shot causes “mortality hundreds of times greater in young people compared to mortality from coronavirus without the vaccine, and dozens of times more in the elderly, when the documented mortality from coronavirus is in the vicinity of the vaccine dose, thus adding greater mortality from heart attack, stroke, etc.”
March 2 2021: Death, “Death Rates Skyrocket in Israel Following Pfizer Experimental COVID “Vaccines”
https://archive.vn/YyaeR
“There is a mismatch between the data published by the authorities and the reality on the ground”
“Compared to other years, mortality is 40 times higher.”
Ok, haven't looked at that one to compare the info at all. Might be worth having multiple articles on some things? Unless they're actually just reprints on a different site or whatever.
I’ve also added all the links to the change notes page here: https://pastelink.net/changes
In case any hero can manage to post them in or stead.
Feb 26 2021 "CDC caught shaving DEATH's from VAERS System!" https://www.bitchute.com/video/IusxOn0sWL59/
There was an article last week saying 75 percent refusal on the vax according to the Pentagon,
"Pentagon reports ALMOST 75 PERCENT of troops turned down Wuhan coronavirus vaccine"
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-02-25-pentagon-almost-75-percent-reject-coronavirus-vaccine.html
The latest article, by the same author on the site, now says only 1/3 refusing it. I wonder what happened there. Was 75% too encouraging, and the Pentagon changed the story? Or were "incentives" applied, maybe?
Feb 28 2021 "Pentagon reports a third of US troops declining Wuhan coronavirus vaccine" https://archive.vn/PSAsB
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-02-28-pentagon-reports-third-us-troops-declining-vaccine.html
That is quite the change in numbers. It is hard to believe any infotainment these days. We are but humble collectors of lies. I wonder if we will ever know what has truly transpired. Praying every day for God’s will and protection.
In my movie, they changed the report because people were throwing a fit. “How could the military not get vaccinated when everyone has to get vaccinated for us to be safe?!” Fear and panic. I think it’s why operation warp speed exists. The public demands something, the optics are presented to appease them. The optics are often shallow (think $2000 stimulus) regardless of the side they come from. In my movie the Pentagon and Trump and protecting the soldiers from the virus and purging the ranks without a politics test required.
Another option is 75% of what? A1/3 of what? Maybe they define it differently in a way that allows them to report the numbers differently. Numbers are sooo manipulated. Like cases over sick, or efficacy. How the number is determined is half of the lie sometimes.
Not sure how much of this is useful, but there's a big list of articles on the page here. Maybe just add a link to the page itself?
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/whistleblower-reveals-many-pregnancy-complications-following-experimental-covid-injections-vaccine-leaving-a-trail-of-devastated-mothers/
There's an article there saying the Pfizer fact sheet is different for the UK, and says pregnant women shouldn't take the shot. The US one doesn't have that warning.
https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/unlike-uk-u-s-fda-allows-pregnant-and-lactating-women-to-receive-experimental-pfizer-covid-vaccine/
The article has a link to a copy of the fact sheet, on their site. Section 4.6 is the pregnancy warning. But it's not the current fact sheet.
https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/12/Information_for_healthcare_professionals.pdf
If you search for the title, it shows up on a UK site, and the pdf there is more recent.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19?1=
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/955899/Temporary_Authorisation_HCP_Information_BNT162_6_0_UK_editclean.pdf
The more recent one mentions animal studies, and says no evidence of harm to fetus, etc was found. Still says "should only be considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks".
The FDA fact sheet is already in the end section of the links pages. It mentions an experiment on rats, says data is not sufficient to "inform" risks. Section 11.1.
https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download
I ran into something very similar. March 4 2021: Deaths, miscarriages etc, “Whistleblower Reveals Many Pregnancy Complications following Experimental COVID Injections – “Vaccine Leaving a Trail of Devastated Mothers” https://archive.vn/spebS Cdc gets Royalties?
They do a good job of composing a bunch of links into the article.
That’s the first I’ve heard them mention the animal studies. Maybe it’s been brought up enough they had to address it (Though providing nothing.)
Probably, wouldn't be surprised if it was entirely a CYA move with the studies all paid for by pfizer and moderna.
Right. Sources say, but not about why pay.
March 4 2021: “5 ways they’re trying to trick you into taking the Covid “vaccine” https://archive.vn/hD9hj
Not sure if this is worth adding to the links info, but it's an indication of how things are right now, I think.
https://vaccineliberationarmy.com/2021/03/03/vaccine-liberation-army-hacked-the-entire-covid-year-gone/
their end comment was particularly interesting "VLA Comment: “Meditate with the little time you have left”
hmmm. might explain the wall I'm running into. The heat of the war is upon us fren.
I get a feeling with this https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/death-rates-skyrocket-in-israel-following-pfizer-experimental-covid-vaccines/
we might see a conflict between sides coming to a head. Praying that will see the end of this chaos and not just the destruction of dissension.
I was able to update the death page and get your new pdf posted on the pastlink. (loosing the list on screen articles in the process) I will count any successful changes and move into a holding pattern.
Having the toughest time getting this to post today. Idk if it's starlink beta, my social score or the devils in the digispace but atm the best I got is this:
https://communities.win/c/Meta/p/12hkTiEYKc/strange-error-occurred-unable-to/c/
I was able to get the links to post there. I've been at this all day and I have to go to bed. Anyone who can take all this info and make a post for us is more than welcome. Please share the post here with us.
Sadly shrinks away to bed
This one maybe? It's a little light on facts, not sure the tone really fits,
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-03-05-doctor-mocked-coronavirus-vaccine-refusers-dies-jabbed.html
There's actually a few that might be good on the site there now,
https://www.naturalnews.com/index.html
I do see a lot of scoffers to the natural news site, more on sources and such. Not that infotainment news is better. Not that scoffers should always be regarded.
Mar 3 2021 " 'Orders of Magnitude Higher Deaths in the Vaccinated': Israel's Vaccine Data Reveals a Frightening Picture" https://archive.vn/lDNt0
First quote in the article is actually an image, might be useful for memes? https://files.catbox.moe/czajju.png
I’ve got these on that. Which should we keep,
Pfizer’s shot causes “mortality hundreds of times greater in young people compared to mortality from coronavirus without the vaccine, and dozens of times more in the elderly, when the documented mortality from coronavirus is in the vicinity of the vaccine dose, thus adding greater mortality from heart attack, stroke, etc.” March 2 2021: Death, “Death Rates Skyrocket in Israel Following Pfizer Experimental COVID “Vaccines” https://archive.vn/YyaeR “There is a mismatch between the data published by the authorities and the reality on the ground” “Compared to other years, mortality is 40 times higher.”
Image 4chan post about this. https://i.maga.host/yjHd4Tb.png
Maybe keep both? They're about the same thing but the info is different, the graphs and quotes.
Ok, haven't looked at that one to compare the info at all. Might be worth having multiple articles on some things? Unless they're actually just reprints on a different site or whatever.