There's an article there saying the Pfizer fact sheet is different for the UK, and says pregnant women shouldn't take the shot. The US one doesn't have that warning.
The more recent one mentions animal studies, and says no evidence of harm to fetus, etc was found. Still says "should only be considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks".
The FDA fact sheet is already in the end section of the links pages. It mentions an experiment on rats, says data is not sufficient to "inform" risks. Section 11.1.
I ran into something very similar.
March 4 2021: Deaths, miscarriages etc, “Whistleblower Reveals Many Pregnancy Complications following Experimental COVID Injections – “Vaccine Leaving a Trail of Devastated Mothers” https://archive.vn/spebS
Cdc gets Royalties?
They do a good job of composing a bunch of links into the article.
That’s the first I’ve heard them mention the animal studies. Maybe it’s been brought up enough they had to address it (Though providing nothing.)
Not sure how much of this is useful, but there's a big list of articles on the page here. Maybe just add a link to the page itself?
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/whistleblower-reveals-many-pregnancy-complications-following-experimental-covid-injections-vaccine-leaving-a-trail-of-devastated-mothers/
There's an article there saying the Pfizer fact sheet is different for the UK, and says pregnant women shouldn't take the shot. The US one doesn't have that warning.
https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/unlike-uk-u-s-fda-allows-pregnant-and-lactating-women-to-receive-experimental-pfizer-covid-vaccine/
The article has a link to a copy of the fact sheet, on their site. Section 4.6 is the pregnancy warning. But it's not the current fact sheet.
https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/12/Information_for_healthcare_professionals.pdf
If you search for the title, it shows up on a UK site, and the pdf there is more recent.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19?1=
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/955899/Temporary_Authorisation_HCP_Information_BNT162_6_0_UK_editclean.pdf
The more recent one mentions animal studies, and says no evidence of harm to fetus, etc was found. Still says "should only be considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks".
The FDA fact sheet is already in the end section of the links pages. It mentions an experiment on rats, says data is not sufficient to "inform" risks. Section 11.1.
https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download
I ran into something very similar. March 4 2021: Deaths, miscarriages etc, “Whistleblower Reveals Many Pregnancy Complications following Experimental COVID Injections – “Vaccine Leaving a Trail of Devastated Mothers” https://archive.vn/spebS Cdc gets Royalties?
They do a good job of composing a bunch of links into the article.
That’s the first I’ve heard them mention the animal studies. Maybe it’s been brought up enough they had to address it (Though providing nothing.)
Probably, wouldn't be surprised if it was entirely a CYA move with the studies all paid for by pfizer and moderna.
Right. Sources say, but not about why pay.
March 4 2021: “5 ways they’re trying to trick you into taking the Covid “vaccine” https://archive.vn/hD9hj