So have we figured out yet why President Trump told us to take the jab? I still have not seen a theory that makes sense...
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
I was thinking about this last night, and trying to reconcile Trump’s enthusiasm about pushing the vaccines, and I have a theory that’s probably a little too much hopium.
A few weeks ago, we saw news that another vaccine company (Merck?) was stopping development work on their vaccine, because it wasn’t as effective as your own immune system. Somewhere in that article, it said something about them switching focus to a treatment to “reduce the immune system’s over-response to the virus”. Am I crazy, or does this sound like they’re working on a way to treat the effects of pathogenic priming (cytokine storm)? Apparently, it’s already showing promise in clinical studies.
So, what if the antidote to the “vaccine” already exists? White hats in control and using Merck (didn’t their CEO recently resign or die or something?). Further, what if the white hats are in control everywhere, and the new “3rd dose” of Moderna and Pfizer are actually this remedy? Trump is encouraging people to get the jab, so hopefully the people who were foolish enough to get the first 2 will get the 3rd. (It isn’t going to change the minds of people who know what it is.) Once everything is revealed, they can explain what the DS tried to do, how Trump and Co. tried to counteract it, and btw, we have the remedy for anyone who hasn’t already gotten it. (At this point, I imagine there’s a lot of people who aren’t going to trust Moderna and Pfizer for the remedy, so enter Merck with theirs.)
Too much to hope for?