121 What is the implication of this Supreme Court case on them pushing mandatory vaccines? This is concerning. They'll have to kill me first. (media.greatawakening.win) posted 3 years ago by CoyoteRed 3 years ago by CoyoteRed +121 / -0 34 comments download share 34 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
It's not a vaccine. Vaccines provide immunity, which this does not. This is gene therapy being called a vaccine, probably for liability reasons. But I am no doctor, so that's just my view.
In this case, vaccine is just a marketing name, like BLM.